Cargando…

Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain

AIMS: A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escobar Cervantes, Carlos, Martí-Almor, Julio, Cabeza, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez, Bowrin, Kevin, Llorac Moix, Aleix, Genís Gironès, Mar, Gasche, David, Millier, Aurélie, Tardu, Jean, Toumi, Mondher, Briere, Jean-Baptiste
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266658
_version_ 1784689606320455680
author Escobar Cervantes, Carlos
Martí-Almor, Julio
Cabeza, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez
Bowrin, Kevin
Llorac Moix, Aleix
Genís Gironès, Mar
Gasche, David
Millier, Aurélie
Tardu, Jean
Toumi, Mondher
Briere, Jean-Baptiste
author_facet Escobar Cervantes, Carlos
Martí-Almor, Julio
Cabeza, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez
Bowrin, Kevin
Llorac Moix, Aleix
Genís Gironès, Mar
Gasche, David
Millier, Aurélie
Tardu, Jean
Toumi, Mondher
Briere, Jean-Baptiste
author_sort Escobar Cervantes, Carlos
collection PubMed
description AIMS: A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. METHODS: All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. RESULTS: When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of €77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was €952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was €4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was €32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90206812022-04-21 Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain Escobar Cervantes, Carlos Martí-Almor, Julio Cabeza, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Bowrin, Kevin Llorac Moix, Aleix Genís Gironès, Mar Gasche, David Millier, Aurélie Tardu, Jean Toumi, Mondher Briere, Jean-Baptiste PLoS One Research Article AIMS: A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. METHODS: All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. RESULTS: When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of €77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was €952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was €4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was €32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective. Public Library of Science 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9020681/ /pubmed/35443000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266658 Text en © 2022 Escobar Cervantes et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Escobar Cervantes, Carlos
Martí-Almor, Julio
Cabeza, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez
Bowrin, Kevin
Llorac Moix, Aleix
Genís Gironès, Mar
Gasche, David
Millier, Aurélie
Tardu, Jean
Toumi, Mondher
Briere, Jean-Baptiste
Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_full Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_fullStr Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_short Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_sort real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of noacs versus vka for stroke prevention in spain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266658
work_keys_str_mv AT escobarcervantescarlos realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT martialmorjulio realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT cabezaalejandroisidoroperez realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT bowrinkevin realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT lloracmoixaleix realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT genisgironesmar realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT gaschedavid realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT millieraurelie realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT tardujean realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT toumimondher realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT brierejeanbaptiste realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain