Cargando…
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247 |
_version_ | 1784689613992886272 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Jennifer C. Hsu, Chun Liang Barha, Cindy Jehu, Deborah A. Chan, Patrick Ghag, Cheyenne Jacova, Patrizio Adjetey, Cassandra Dian, Larry Parmar, Naaz Madden, Kenneth Liu-Ambrose, Teresa |
author_facet | Davis, Jennifer C. Hsu, Chun Liang Barha, Cindy Jehu, Deborah A. Chan, Patrick Ghag, Cheyenne Jacova, Patrizio Adjetey, Cassandra Dian, Larry Parmar, Naaz Madden, Kenneth Liu-Ambrose, Teresa |
author_sort | Davis, Jennifer C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prospective economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial (OEP compared with usual care). Three hundred and forty four community-dwelling older adults (≥70; 172 OEP (110 women; 62 men), 172 usual care (119 women; 53 men)) who sustained a fall in the past 12 months and received a baseline assessment at the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic, Canada were included. A gender by OEP/usual care interaction was examined for the falls incidence rate ratio (IRR). Outcome measures stratified by gender included: falls IRR, incremental cost-per fall prevented (ICER), incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY, ICUR) gained, and mean total health care resource utilization costs. RESULTS: Men were frailer than women at baseline. Men incurred higher mean total healthcare costs $6794 (SD: $11906)). There was no significant gender by OEP/usual care interaction on falls IRR. The efficacy of the OEP did not vary by gender. The adjusted IRR for the OEP group demonstrated a 39% (IRR: 0.61, CI: 0.40–0.93) significant reduction in falls among men but not women (32% reduction (IRR: 0.69, CI: 0.47–1.02)). The ICER showed the OEP was effective in preventing falls and less costly for men, while it was costlier for women by $42. The ICUR showed the OEP did not impact quality of life. CONCLUSION: Future studies should explore gender factors (i.e., health seeking behaviours, gender related frailty) that may explain observed variation in the cost-effectiveness of the OEP as a secondary falls prevention strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System Identifier: NCT01029171; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01029171 Identifier: NCT00323596; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00323596 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9020705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90207052022-04-21 Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Davis, Jennifer C. Hsu, Chun Liang Barha, Cindy Jehu, Deborah A. Chan, Patrick Ghag, Cheyenne Jacova, Patrizio Adjetey, Cassandra Dian, Larry Parmar, Naaz Madden, Kenneth Liu-Ambrose, Teresa PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prospective economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial (OEP compared with usual care). Three hundred and forty four community-dwelling older adults (≥70; 172 OEP (110 women; 62 men), 172 usual care (119 women; 53 men)) who sustained a fall in the past 12 months and received a baseline assessment at the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic, Canada were included. A gender by OEP/usual care interaction was examined for the falls incidence rate ratio (IRR). Outcome measures stratified by gender included: falls IRR, incremental cost-per fall prevented (ICER), incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY, ICUR) gained, and mean total health care resource utilization costs. RESULTS: Men were frailer than women at baseline. Men incurred higher mean total healthcare costs $6794 (SD: $11906)). There was no significant gender by OEP/usual care interaction on falls IRR. The efficacy of the OEP did not vary by gender. The adjusted IRR for the OEP group demonstrated a 39% (IRR: 0.61, CI: 0.40–0.93) significant reduction in falls among men but not women (32% reduction (IRR: 0.69, CI: 0.47–1.02)). The ICER showed the OEP was effective in preventing falls and less costly for men, while it was costlier for women by $42. The ICUR showed the OEP did not impact quality of life. CONCLUSION: Future studies should explore gender factors (i.e., health seeking behaviours, gender related frailty) that may explain observed variation in the cost-effectiveness of the OEP as a secondary falls prevention strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System Identifier: NCT01029171; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01029171 Identifier: NCT00323596; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00323596 Public Library of Science 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9020705/ /pubmed/35442974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247 Text en © 2022 Davis et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Davis, Jennifer C. Hsu, Chun Liang Barha, Cindy Jehu, Deborah A. Chan, Patrick Ghag, Cheyenne Jacova, Patrizio Adjetey, Cassandra Dian, Larry Parmar, Naaz Madden, Kenneth Liu-Ambrose, Teresa Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the cost-effectiveness of the otago exercise programme among older women and men: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisjenniferc comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hsuchunliang comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barhacindy comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jehudeboraha comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chanpatrick comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ghagcheyenne comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jacovapatrizio comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adjeteycassandra comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dianlarry comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parmarnaaz comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maddenkenneth comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuambroseteresa comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |