Cargando…

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Jennifer C., Hsu, Chun Liang, Barha, Cindy, Jehu, Deborah A., Chan, Patrick, Ghag, Cheyenne, Jacova, Patrizio, Adjetey, Cassandra, Dian, Larry, Parmar, Naaz, Madden, Kenneth, Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247
_version_ 1784689613992886272
author Davis, Jennifer C.
Hsu, Chun Liang
Barha, Cindy
Jehu, Deborah A.
Chan, Patrick
Ghag, Cheyenne
Jacova, Patrizio
Adjetey, Cassandra
Dian, Larry
Parmar, Naaz
Madden, Kenneth
Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
author_facet Davis, Jennifer C.
Hsu, Chun Liang
Barha, Cindy
Jehu, Deborah A.
Chan, Patrick
Ghag, Cheyenne
Jacova, Patrizio
Adjetey, Cassandra
Dian, Larry
Parmar, Naaz
Madden, Kenneth
Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
author_sort Davis, Jennifer C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prospective economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial (OEP compared with usual care). Three hundred and forty four community-dwelling older adults (≥70; 172 OEP (110 women; 62 men), 172 usual care (119 women; 53 men)) who sustained a fall in the past 12 months and received a baseline assessment at the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic, Canada were included. A gender by OEP/usual care interaction was examined for the falls incidence rate ratio (IRR). Outcome measures stratified by gender included: falls IRR, incremental cost-per fall prevented (ICER), incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY, ICUR) gained, and mean total health care resource utilization costs. RESULTS: Men were frailer than women at baseline. Men incurred higher mean total healthcare costs $6794 (SD: $11906)). There was no significant gender by OEP/usual care interaction on falls IRR. The efficacy of the OEP did not vary by gender. The adjusted IRR for the OEP group demonstrated a 39% (IRR: 0.61, CI: 0.40–0.93) significant reduction in falls among men but not women (32% reduction (IRR: 0.69, CI: 0.47–1.02)). The ICER showed the OEP was effective in preventing falls and less costly for men, while it was costlier for women by $42. The ICUR showed the OEP did not impact quality of life. CONCLUSION: Future studies should explore gender factors (i.e., health seeking behaviours, gender related frailty) that may explain observed variation in the cost-effectiveness of the OEP as a secondary falls prevention strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System Identifier: NCT01029171; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01029171 Identifier: NCT00323596; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00323596
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90207052022-04-21 Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Davis, Jennifer C. Hsu, Chun Liang Barha, Cindy Jehu, Deborah A. Chan, Patrick Ghag, Cheyenne Jacova, Patrizio Adjetey, Cassandra Dian, Larry Parmar, Naaz Madden, Kenneth Liu-Ambrose, Teresa PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Using stratified analyses, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP), from a health care system perspective, among older women and men who have previously fallen. METHODS: This study was a secondary stratified analysis (by women and men), of a 12-month prospective economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial (OEP compared with usual care). Three hundred and forty four community-dwelling older adults (≥70; 172 OEP (110 women; 62 men), 172 usual care (119 women; 53 men)) who sustained a fall in the past 12 months and received a baseline assessment at the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic, Canada were included. A gender by OEP/usual care interaction was examined for the falls incidence rate ratio (IRR). Outcome measures stratified by gender included: falls IRR, incremental cost-per fall prevented (ICER), incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY, ICUR) gained, and mean total health care resource utilization costs. RESULTS: Men were frailer than women at baseline. Men incurred higher mean total healthcare costs $6794 (SD: $11906)). There was no significant gender by OEP/usual care interaction on falls IRR. The efficacy of the OEP did not vary by gender. The adjusted IRR for the OEP group demonstrated a 39% (IRR: 0.61, CI: 0.40–0.93) significant reduction in falls among men but not women (32% reduction (IRR: 0.69, CI: 0.47–1.02)). The ICER showed the OEP was effective in preventing falls and less costly for men, while it was costlier for women by $42. The ICUR showed the OEP did not impact quality of life. CONCLUSION: Future studies should explore gender factors (i.e., health seeking behaviours, gender related frailty) that may explain observed variation in the cost-effectiveness of the OEP as a secondary falls prevention strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System Identifier: NCT01029171; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01029171 Identifier: NCT00323596; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00323596 Public Library of Science 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9020705/ /pubmed/35442974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247 Text en © 2022 Davis et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davis, Jennifer C.
Hsu, Chun Liang
Barha, Cindy
Jehu, Deborah A.
Chan, Patrick
Ghag, Cheyenne
Jacova, Patrizio
Adjetey, Cassandra
Dian, Larry
Parmar, Naaz
Madden, Kenneth
Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Programme among older women and men: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing the cost-effectiveness of the otago exercise programme among older women and men: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267247
work_keys_str_mv AT davisjenniferc comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hsuchunliang comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barhacindy comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jehudeboraha comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chanpatrick comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ghagcheyenne comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jacovapatrizio comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adjeteycassandra comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dianlarry comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parmarnaaz comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maddenkenneth comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuambroseteresa comparingthecosteffectivenessoftheotagoexerciseprogrammeamongolderwomenandmenasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial