Cargando…

Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool

Introduction Documentation within the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an essential skill for medical students to succeed in residency and post-residency training. The increased use of medical student progress notes for billable services raises the need for the education and assessment of quality n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Michelle, Chan, Neilson, Evans, Jonathan, Min, Jonathan K, Hayton, Amy C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475068
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23369
_version_ 1784689644848283648
author Kim, Michelle
Chan, Neilson
Evans, Jonathan
Min, Jonathan K
Hayton, Amy C
author_facet Kim, Michelle
Chan, Neilson
Evans, Jonathan
Min, Jonathan K
Hayton, Amy C
author_sort Kim, Michelle
collection PubMed
description Introduction Documentation within the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an essential skill for medical students to succeed in residency and post-residency training. The increased use of medical student progress notes for billable services raises the need for the education and assessment of quality note writing. We hypothesized that structured note feedback using a note assessment tool would improve the quality of medical student inpatient progress notes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study to review the quality of student inpatient progress notes written before and after structured feedback using the Responsible Electronic Documentation (RED) checklist throughout a third-year internal medicine clerkship. The first intervention group received feedback from clerkship directors in the 2017-2018 academic year and the second intervention group received feedback from ward residents/attendings in the 2018-2019 academic year. Within each intervention group, the total note scores from pre and post-intervention were compared. Results Feedback from clerkship directors yielded a greater increase in students’ total note score from pre to post-intervention compared to ward resident/attending feedback (F(1,255) = 12.84, p < 0.001). Cohen’s d effect size value was greater for the clerkship director feedback arm (d=0.71) compared to the ward resident/attending feedback arm (d=0.24). Post-hoc analyses using dependent sample t-tests revealed that there were significant increases in total note scores from pre to post-intervention for both the clerkship director arm (t(123) = 8.26, p < 0.001, d = 0.71) and the ward resident/attending arm (t(132) = 2.85, p = 0.005, d = 0.24). Conclusion Clerkship director feedback led to a greater increase in medical student documentation compared to ward attending/resident feedback. Nonetheless, structured feedback with a note assessment tool, whether from clerkship directors or ward attendings/residents, leads to a significant improvement in medical student documentation. Though there are various methods for providing feedback, educators can use the RED checklist to provide clear guidelines that will facilitate note-writing feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90208062022-04-25 Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool Kim, Michelle Chan, Neilson Evans, Jonathan Min, Jonathan K Hayton, Amy C Cureus Internal Medicine Introduction Documentation within the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an essential skill for medical students to succeed in residency and post-residency training. The increased use of medical student progress notes for billable services raises the need for the education and assessment of quality note writing. We hypothesized that structured note feedback using a note assessment tool would improve the quality of medical student inpatient progress notes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study to review the quality of student inpatient progress notes written before and after structured feedback using the Responsible Electronic Documentation (RED) checklist throughout a third-year internal medicine clerkship. The first intervention group received feedback from clerkship directors in the 2017-2018 academic year and the second intervention group received feedback from ward residents/attendings in the 2018-2019 academic year. Within each intervention group, the total note scores from pre and post-intervention were compared. Results Feedback from clerkship directors yielded a greater increase in students’ total note score from pre to post-intervention compared to ward resident/attending feedback (F(1,255) = 12.84, p < 0.001). Cohen’s d effect size value was greater for the clerkship director feedback arm (d=0.71) compared to the ward resident/attending feedback arm (d=0.24). Post-hoc analyses using dependent sample t-tests revealed that there were significant increases in total note scores from pre to post-intervention for both the clerkship director arm (t(123) = 8.26, p < 0.001, d = 0.71) and the ward resident/attending arm (t(132) = 2.85, p = 0.005, d = 0.24). Conclusion Clerkship director feedback led to a greater increase in medical student documentation compared to ward attending/resident feedback. Nonetheless, structured feedback with a note assessment tool, whether from clerkship directors or ward attendings/residents, leads to a significant improvement in medical student documentation. Though there are various methods for providing feedback, educators can use the RED checklist to provide clear guidelines that will facilitate note-writing feedback. Cureus 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9020806/ /pubmed/35475068 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23369 Text en Copyright © 2022, Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Kim, Michelle
Chan, Neilson
Evans, Jonathan
Min, Jonathan K
Hayton, Amy C
Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title_full Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title_fullStr Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title_full_unstemmed Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title_short Improving Medical Student Inpatient Documentation Through Feedback Using a Note Assessment Tool
title_sort improving medical student inpatient documentation through feedback using a note assessment tool
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475068
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23369
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmichelle improvingmedicalstudentinpatientdocumentationthroughfeedbackusinganoteassessmenttool
AT channeilson improvingmedicalstudentinpatientdocumentationthroughfeedbackusinganoteassessmenttool
AT evansjonathan improvingmedicalstudentinpatientdocumentationthroughfeedbackusinganoteassessmenttool
AT minjonathank improvingmedicalstudentinpatientdocumentationthroughfeedbackusinganoteassessmenttool
AT haytonamyc improvingmedicalstudentinpatientdocumentationthroughfeedbackusinganoteassessmenttool