Cargando…

Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?

OBJECTIVES: Extracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is an important cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). It can be diagnosed using contrast-enhanced CT or MR angiography (MRA) as well as Doppler ultrasound. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic value o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osmanodja, Filiz, Scheitz, Jan F., Fiebach, Jochen B., Ganeshan, Ramanan, Villringer, Kersten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10876-0
_version_ 1784689717045886976
author Osmanodja, Filiz
Scheitz, Jan F.
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Villringer, Kersten
author_facet Osmanodja, Filiz
Scheitz, Jan F.
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Villringer, Kersten
author_sort Osmanodja, Filiz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Extracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is an important cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). It can be diagnosed using contrast-enhanced CT or MR angiography (MRA) as well as Doppler ultrasound. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic value of intracranial time-of-flight (TOF) MRA to predict extracranial ICA stenosis (ICAS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA and middle- (50–69%) or high-grade (70–99%) unilateral extracranial ICAS according to NASCET criteria assessed by ultrasound between January 2016 and August 2018. The control group consisted of patients without extracranial ICAS. Intraluminal signal intensities (SI) of the intracranial ICA on the side of the extracranial stenosis were compared to the contralesional side on TOF-MRA source images. SI ratios (SIR) of contralesional:lesional side were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were included in the main analysis. Contralesional:lesional SIR in the intracranial C4-segment was significantly higher in patients with ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis (n = 51, median 74 years, 57% male) compared to the control group (n = 100, median 68 years, 48% male). Mean SIR was 1.463 vs. 1.035 (p < 0.001) for right-sided stenosis and 1.362 vs. 1.000 (p < 0.001) for left-sided stenosis. Receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated a cut-off value of 1.086 for right-sided [sensitivity/specificity 75%/81%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.81] and 1.104 for left-sided stenosis (sensitivity/specificity 70%/84%; AUC 0.80) in C4 as a good predictor for high-grade extracranial ICAS. CONCLUSIONS: SIR on TOF-MRA can be a marker of extracranial ICAS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10876-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9021057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90210572022-05-04 Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis? Osmanodja, Filiz Scheitz, Jan F. Fiebach, Jochen B. Ganeshan, Ramanan Villringer, Kersten J Neurol Original Communication OBJECTIVES: Extracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is an important cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). It can be diagnosed using contrast-enhanced CT or MR angiography (MRA) as well as Doppler ultrasound. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic value of intracranial time-of-flight (TOF) MRA to predict extracranial ICA stenosis (ICAS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA and middle- (50–69%) or high-grade (70–99%) unilateral extracranial ICAS according to NASCET criteria assessed by ultrasound between January 2016 and August 2018. The control group consisted of patients without extracranial ICAS. Intraluminal signal intensities (SI) of the intracranial ICA on the side of the extracranial stenosis were compared to the contralesional side on TOF-MRA source images. SI ratios (SIR) of contralesional:lesional side were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were included in the main analysis. Contralesional:lesional SIR in the intracranial C4-segment was significantly higher in patients with ipsilateral extracranial ICA stenosis (n = 51, median 74 years, 57% male) compared to the control group (n = 100, median 68 years, 48% male). Mean SIR was 1.463 vs. 1.035 (p < 0.001) for right-sided stenosis and 1.362 vs. 1.000 (p < 0.001) for left-sided stenosis. Receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated a cut-off value of 1.086 for right-sided [sensitivity/specificity 75%/81%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.81] and 1.104 for left-sided stenosis (sensitivity/specificity 70%/84%; AUC 0.80) in C4 as a good predictor for high-grade extracranial ICAS. CONCLUSIONS: SIR on TOF-MRA can be a marker of extracranial ICAS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10876-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9021057/ /pubmed/34750675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10876-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Osmanodja, Filiz
Scheitz, Jan F.
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Villringer, Kersten
Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title_full Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title_fullStr Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title_full_unstemmed Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title_short Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
title_sort can intracranial time-of-flight-mr angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10876-0
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanodjafiliz canintracranialtimeofflightmrangiographypredictextracranialcarotidarterystenosis
AT scheitzjanf canintracranialtimeofflightmrangiographypredictextracranialcarotidarterystenosis
AT fiebachjochenb canintracranialtimeofflightmrangiographypredictextracranialcarotidarterystenosis
AT ganeshanramanan canintracranialtimeofflightmrangiographypredictextracranialcarotidarterystenosis
AT villringerkersten canintracranialtimeofflightmrangiographypredictextracranialcarotidarterystenosis