Cargando…

Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group

BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma relies on historical, clinicopathological, and phenotypic risk factors according to American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but may not account for a patient’s individual additional g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farberg, Aaron S., Marson, Justin W., Glazer, Alex, Litchman, Graham H., Svoboda, Ryan, Winkelmann, Richard R., Brownstone, Nicholas, Rigel, Darrell S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x
_version_ 1784689792879951872
author Farberg, Aaron S.
Marson, Justin W.
Glazer, Alex
Litchman, Graham H.
Svoboda, Ryan
Winkelmann, Richard R.
Brownstone, Nicholas
Rigel, Darrell S.
author_facet Farberg, Aaron S.
Marson, Justin W.
Glazer, Alex
Litchman, Graham H.
Svoboda, Ryan
Winkelmann, Richard R.
Brownstone, Nicholas
Rigel, Darrell S.
author_sort Farberg, Aaron S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma relies on historical, clinicopathological, and phenotypic risk factors according to American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but may not account for a patient’s individual additional genetic risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature regarding commercially available gene expression profile (GEP) tests and their use in the management of cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for original, English-language studies or meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2021 on commercially available GEP tests in cutaneous melanoma prognosis, clinical decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy, and real-world efficacy. After the literature review, the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group, an expert panel of dermatologists with specialized training in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis and management, utilized a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus statements regarding prognostic gene expression profile tests. Statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote of > 80%. RESULTS: The initial search identified 1064 studies/meta-analyses that met the search criteria. Of these, we included 21 original articles and meta-analyses that studied the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma; Castle Biosciences, Inc.), five original articles that studied the 11-GEP test (Melagenix; NeraCare GmbH), and four original articles that studied the 8-GEP test with clinicopathological factors (Merlin; 8-GEP + CP; SkylineDx B.V.) in this review. Six statements received supermajority approval and were adopted by the panel. CONCLUSION: GEP tests provide additional, reproducible information for dermatologists to consider within the larger framework of the eighth edition of the AJCC and NCCN cutaneous melanoma guidelines when counseling regarding prognosis and when considering a sentinel lymph node biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9021351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90213512022-05-06 Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group Farberg, Aaron S. Marson, Justin W. Glazer, Alex Litchman, Graham H. Svoboda, Ryan Winkelmann, Richard R. Brownstone, Nicholas Rigel, Darrell S. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Review BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma relies on historical, clinicopathological, and phenotypic risk factors according to American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but may not account for a patient’s individual additional genetic risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature regarding commercially available gene expression profile (GEP) tests and their use in the management of cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for original, English-language studies or meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2021 on commercially available GEP tests in cutaneous melanoma prognosis, clinical decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy, and real-world efficacy. After the literature review, the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group, an expert panel of dermatologists with specialized training in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis and management, utilized a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus statements regarding prognostic gene expression profile tests. Statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote of > 80%. RESULTS: The initial search identified 1064 studies/meta-analyses that met the search criteria. Of these, we included 21 original articles and meta-analyses that studied the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma; Castle Biosciences, Inc.), five original articles that studied the 11-GEP test (Melagenix; NeraCare GmbH), and four original articles that studied the 8-GEP test with clinicopathological factors (Merlin; 8-GEP + CP; SkylineDx B.V.) in this review. Six statements received supermajority approval and were adopted by the panel. CONCLUSION: GEP tests provide additional, reproducible information for dermatologists to consider within the larger framework of the eighth edition of the AJCC and NCCN cutaneous melanoma guidelines when counseling regarding prognosis and when considering a sentinel lymph node biopsy. Springer Healthcare 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9021351/ /pubmed/35353350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Farberg, Aaron S.
Marson, Justin W.
Glazer, Alex
Litchman, Graham H.
Svoboda, Ryan
Winkelmann, Richard R.
Brownstone, Nicholas
Rigel, Darrell S.
Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title_full Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title_fullStr Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title_full_unstemmed Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title_short Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group
title_sort expert consensus on the use of prognostic gene expression profiling tests for the management of cutaneous melanoma: consensus from the skin cancer prevention working group
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x
work_keys_str_mv AT farbergaarons expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT marsonjustinw expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT glazeralex expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT litchmangrahamh expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT svobodaryan expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT winkelmannrichardr expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT brownstonenicholas expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT rigeldarrells expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup
AT expertconsensusontheuseofprognosticgeneexpressionprofilingtestsforthemanagementofcutaneousmelanomaconsensusfromtheskincancerpreventionworkinggroup