Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Two-Step Predictive Risk Stratification Model for Coronavirus Disease 2019 In-hospital Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: An accurate prognostic score to predict mortality for adults with COVID-19 infection is needed to understand who would benefit most from hospitalizations and more intensive support and care. We aimed to develop and validate a two-step score system for patient triage, and to identify pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yang, Kong, Yanlei, Ebell, Mark H., Martinez, Leonardo, Cai, Xinyan, Lennon, Robert P., Tarn, Derjung M., Mainous, Arch G., Zgierska, Aleksandra E., Barrett, Bruce, Tuan, Wen-Jan, Maloy, Kevin, Goyal, Munish, Krist, Alex H., Gal, Tamas S., Sung, Meng-Hsuan, Li, Changwei, Jin, Yier, Shen, Ye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.827261
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: An accurate prognostic score to predict mortality for adults with COVID-19 infection is needed to understand who would benefit most from hospitalizations and more intensive support and care. We aimed to develop and validate a two-step score system for patient triage, and to identify patients at a relatively low level of mortality risk using easy-to-collect individual information. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Four health centers from Virginia Commonwealth University, Georgetown University, the University of Florida, and the University of California, Los Angeles. PATIENTS: Coronavirus Disease 2019-confirmed and hospitalized adult patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 1,673 participants from Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) as the derivation cohort. Risk factors for in-hospital death were identified using a multivariable logistic model with variable selection procedures after repeated missing data imputation. A two-step risk score was developed to identify patients at lower, moderate, and higher mortality risk. The first step selected increasing age, more than one pre-existing comorbidities, heart rate >100 beats/min, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min, and SpO(2) <93% into the predictive model. Besides age and SpO(2), the second step used blood urea nitrogen, absolute neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, platelet count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors. C-statistics reflected very good discrimination with internal validation at VCU (0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88) and external validation at the other three health systems (range, 0.79–0.85). A one-step model was also derived for comparison. Overall, the two-step risk score had better performance than the one-step score. CONCLUSIONS: The two-step scoring system used widely available, point-of-care data for triage of COVID-19 patients and is a potentially time- and cost-saving tool in practice.