Cargando…

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and the dwindling antibiotic development pipeline have resulted in a looming post-antibiotic era. Research related to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has grown rapidly in the past decade, especially in the field of surgery. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yang-Xi, Yang, Ya, Le, Ke-Jia, Zhang, Zai-Li, Cui, Min, Zhong, Han, Gu, Zhi-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.847420
_version_ 1784689878595796992
author Liu, Yang-Xi
Yang, Ya
Le, Ke-Jia
Zhang, Zai-Li
Cui, Min
Zhong, Han
Gu, Zhi-Chun
author_facet Liu, Yang-Xi
Yang, Ya
Le, Ke-Jia
Zhang, Zai-Li
Cui, Min
Zhong, Han
Gu, Zhi-Chun
author_sort Liu, Yang-Xi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and the dwindling antibiotic development pipeline have resulted in a looming post-antibiotic era. Research related to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has grown rapidly in the past decade, especially in the field of surgery. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of these publications. In addition, we aimed to identify research hotspots and infer future research trends. METHODS: We screened global publications on AMS in the surgical field over ten years (between 2011 and 2020) from the Web of Science core collection database. The keywords “antimicrobial or antibiotic”, “stewardship”, “management”, “management strategies”, “programme”, “surgery” and “surgical” were used to search for related papers. VOS viewer, R software, and other machine learning and visualization tools were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis of the publications. RESULTS: We identified 674 publications on AMS in surgical fields; “antimicrobial stewardship” (with total link strength of 1,096) was the most frequent keyword, and had strong links to “antimicrobial resistance” and “guidelines”. The top 100 most cited papers had a mean citation count of 47.21 (range: 17–1155) citations, which were cited by survey research studies, clinical trials, and observational studies. The highest-ranking and most cited journal was Clinical Infectious Diseases with eight publications. Jason G. Newland from Washington University wrote seven papers and was cited 1,282 times. The University of Washington published 17 papers and was cited 1,258 times, with the largest number of publications by author and organization. The USA published 198 papers and cooperated with 21 countries, mainly partnering with Italy, the UK, and Canada. Published articles mainly focused on the current clinical situation regarding surgical AMS management, antibiotic prescription, and antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Publications on surgical AMS management have increased in recent decades, with the USA being the most prolific. Epidemiological investigations of surgical-related infections, antibiotic prescriptions, and antibiotic resistance are fast-developing research trends. However, further improvements are still needed according to the recommendations gained from the bibliometric analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9021645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90216452022-04-22 Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis Liu, Yang-Xi Yang, Ya Le, Ke-Jia Zhang, Zai-Li Cui, Min Zhong, Han Gu, Zhi-Chun Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and the dwindling antibiotic development pipeline have resulted in a looming post-antibiotic era. Research related to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has grown rapidly in the past decade, especially in the field of surgery. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of these publications. In addition, we aimed to identify research hotspots and infer future research trends. METHODS: We screened global publications on AMS in the surgical field over ten years (between 2011 and 2020) from the Web of Science core collection database. The keywords “antimicrobial or antibiotic”, “stewardship”, “management”, “management strategies”, “programme”, “surgery” and “surgical” were used to search for related papers. VOS viewer, R software, and other machine learning and visualization tools were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis of the publications. RESULTS: We identified 674 publications on AMS in surgical fields; “antimicrobial stewardship” (with total link strength of 1,096) was the most frequent keyword, and had strong links to “antimicrobial resistance” and “guidelines”. The top 100 most cited papers had a mean citation count of 47.21 (range: 17–1155) citations, which were cited by survey research studies, clinical trials, and observational studies. The highest-ranking and most cited journal was Clinical Infectious Diseases with eight publications. Jason G. Newland from Washington University wrote seven papers and was cited 1,282 times. The University of Washington published 17 papers and was cited 1,258 times, with the largest number of publications by author and organization. The USA published 198 papers and cooperated with 21 countries, mainly partnering with Italy, the UK, and Canada. Published articles mainly focused on the current clinical situation regarding surgical AMS management, antibiotic prescription, and antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Publications on surgical AMS management have increased in recent decades, with the USA being the most prolific. Epidemiological investigations of surgical-related infections, antibiotic prescriptions, and antibiotic resistance are fast-developing research trends. However, further improvements are still needed according to the recommendations gained from the bibliometric analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9021645/ /pubmed/35462840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.847420 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Yang, Le, Zhang, Cui, Zhong and Gu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Liu, Yang-Xi
Yang, Ya
Le, Ke-Jia
Zhang, Zai-Li
Cui, Min
Zhong, Han
Gu, Zhi-Chun
Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title_full Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title_short Antimicrobial Stewardship in Surgery: A Literature Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: a literature bibliometric analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.847420
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyangxi antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT yangya antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT lekejia antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT zhangzaili antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT cuimin antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT zhonghan antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis
AT guzhichun antimicrobialstewardshipinsurgeryaliteraturebibliometricanalysis