Cargando…

Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion

BACKGROUND: Recognised as an essential element in end-of-life care by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, effective teamwork can enhance the quality and safety of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth funded project th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devery, Kim, Winsall, Megan, Rawlings, Deb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001724
_version_ 1784689907689586688
author Devery, Kim
Winsall, Megan
Rawlings, Deb
author_facet Devery, Kim
Winsall, Megan
Rawlings, Deb
author_sort Devery, Kim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recognised as an essential element in end-of-life care by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, effective teamwork can enhance the quality and safety of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth funded project that delivers peer-reviewed, evidence-based, online education and practice change resources for doctors, nurses and allied health professionals working in hospitals. ‘Teams and Continuity for the Patient’ features in the suite of EOLE modules and includes education around effective teamwork in end-of-life care. The aim of this study was to explore the views of module learners on managing differences of opinion among staff regarding patient care management. METHODS: Participants were learners (health professionals) who registered to the EOLE website and engaged with the Teams module. Learner responses to a question posed at the end of the module ‘How do you manage differences of opinion among staff regarding patient care management?’ were extracted for a 12-month period. Qualitative data were analysed thematically in NVivo V.12, with pragmatism as an overarching theoretical framework. Data were coded using an inductive, open approach, and axial coding was used to organise the codes into themes and subthemes. FINDINGS: A total of 293 learner statements were analysed, with subthemes organised into three overarching themes: prioritising the patient, team collaboration and communication skills and emotional awareness. CONCLUSION: In complex, fast-paced, hospital environments, the potential for conflict among teams is high. Quality care relies on team members who work in unison, who can also recognise conflict emerging and respond in respectful and appropriate ways. In this study, the management actions reported by health professionals as proving helpful when differences of opinion among team members arise, are valuable to organisations who are considering how to prepare for quality and safety accreditation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9021766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90217662022-05-04 Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion Devery, Kim Winsall, Megan Rawlings, Deb BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Recognised as an essential element in end-of-life care by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, effective teamwork can enhance the quality and safety of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth funded project that delivers peer-reviewed, evidence-based, online education and practice change resources for doctors, nurses and allied health professionals working in hospitals. ‘Teams and Continuity for the Patient’ features in the suite of EOLE modules and includes education around effective teamwork in end-of-life care. The aim of this study was to explore the views of module learners on managing differences of opinion among staff regarding patient care management. METHODS: Participants were learners (health professionals) who registered to the EOLE website and engaged with the Teams module. Learner responses to a question posed at the end of the module ‘How do you manage differences of opinion among staff regarding patient care management?’ were extracted for a 12-month period. Qualitative data were analysed thematically in NVivo V.12, with pragmatism as an overarching theoretical framework. Data were coded using an inductive, open approach, and axial coding was used to organise the codes into themes and subthemes. FINDINGS: A total of 293 learner statements were analysed, with subthemes organised into three overarching themes: prioritising the patient, team collaboration and communication skills and emotional awareness. CONCLUSION: In complex, fast-paced, hospital environments, the potential for conflict among teams is high. Quality care relies on team members who work in unison, who can also recognise conflict emerging and respond in respectful and appropriate ways. In this study, the management actions reported by health professionals as proving helpful when differences of opinion among team members arise, are valuable to organisations who are considering how to prepare for quality and safety accreditation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9021766/ /pubmed/35443999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001724 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Devery, Kim
Winsall, Megan
Rawlings, Deb
Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title_full Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title_fullStr Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title_full_unstemmed Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title_short Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
title_sort teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001724
work_keys_str_mv AT deverykim teamsandcontinuityofendoflifecareinhospitalsmanagingdifferencesofopinion
AT winsallmegan teamsandcontinuityofendoflifecareinhospitalsmanagingdifferencesofopinion
AT rawlingsdeb teamsandcontinuityofendoflifecareinhospitalsmanagingdifferencesofopinion