Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Mengmeng, Ma, Rui, Zhang, Shanfeng, Wang, Shanshan, Jiao, Jiawei, Liu, Lamei, Wang, Panpan, Zhang, Zhenxiang, Wang, Peng, Li, Xiaoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093
_version_ 1784689920282984448
author Li, Mengmeng
Ma, Rui
Zhang, Shanfeng
Wang, Shanshan
Jiao, Jiawei
Liu, Lamei
Wang, Panpan
Zhang, Zhenxiang
Wang, Peng
Li, Xiaoyan
author_facet Li, Mengmeng
Ma, Rui
Zhang, Shanfeng
Wang, Shanshan
Jiao, Jiawei
Liu, Lamei
Wang, Panpan
Zhang, Zhenxiang
Wang, Peng
Li, Xiaoyan
author_sort Li, Mengmeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People’s hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach’s α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test–retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9021805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90218052022-05-04 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study Li, Mengmeng Ma, Rui Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Shanshan Jiao, Jiawei Liu, Lamei Wang, Panpan Zhang, Zhenxiang Wang, Peng Li, Xiaoyan BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People’s hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach’s α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test–retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9021805/ /pubmed/35443942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Li, Mengmeng
Ma, Rui
Zhang, Shanfeng
Wang, Shanshan
Jiao, Jiawei
Liu, Lamei
Wang, Panpan
Zhang, Zhenxiang
Wang, Peng
Li, Xiaoyan
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title_full Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title_short Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
title_sort reliability and validity of the chinese version of the family resilience questionnaire (fare questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093
work_keys_str_mv AT limengmeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT marui reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangshanfeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT wangshanshan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT jiaojiawei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT liulamei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT wangpanpan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangzhenxiang reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT wangpeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy
AT lixiaoyan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy