Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093 |
_version_ | 1784689920282984448 |
---|---|
author | Li, Mengmeng Ma, Rui Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Shanshan Jiao, Jiawei Liu, Lamei Wang, Panpan Zhang, Zhenxiang Wang, Peng Li, Xiaoyan |
author_facet | Li, Mengmeng Ma, Rui Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Shanshan Jiao, Jiawei Liu, Lamei Wang, Panpan Zhang, Zhenxiang Wang, Peng Li, Xiaoyan |
author_sort | Li, Mengmeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People’s hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach’s α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test–retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9021805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90218052022-05-04 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study Li, Mengmeng Ma, Rui Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Shanshan Jiao, Jiawei Liu, Lamei Wang, Panpan Zhang, Zhenxiang Wang, Peng Li, Xiaoyan BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire among patients with breast cancer in China. DESIGN: It was a cross-sectional study, which involved translation, back-translation, cultural adjustment and psychometric testing of a 24-item FaRE Questionnaire. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, China: respectively are the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and Henan Provincial People’s hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 559 patients with breast cancer volunteered to participate in the study PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software V.21.0 and AMOS software V.21.0. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient on 30 participants. The content validity index was calculated based on the values obtained from six expert opinions. Construct validity test was performed using factor analysis including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: For the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.909, and Cronbach’s α coefficients of four factors were 0.902, 0.932, 0.905 and 0.963, respectively. The test–retest reliability index of the total questionnaire was 0.905. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.97, and Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The questionnaire included 24 items, exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with loading >0.4, which could explain 72.146% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire had an excellent four-factor model consistent with the original questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of FaRE Questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer in China. It can effectively assess family resilience and provide basis for personalised family resilience interventions for patients with breast cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9021805/ /pubmed/35443942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Nursing Li, Mengmeng Ma, Rui Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Shanshan Jiao, Jiawei Liu, Lamei Wang, Panpan Zhang, Zhenxiang Wang, Peng Li, Xiaoyan Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the chinese version of the family resilience questionnaire (fare questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limengmeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT marui reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT zhangshanfeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT wangshanshan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT jiaojiawei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT liulamei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT wangpanpan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT zhangzhenxiang reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT wangpeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy AT lixiaoyan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofthefamilyresiliencequestionnairefarequestionnaireinpatientswithbreastcanceracrosssectionalstudy |