Cargando…
Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is particularly important in oncology as many treatments involve serious side effects, and treatment decisions involve a trade-off between benefits and risks. However, the implementation of SDM in oncology care is challenging, and clinicians state that it is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383572 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35543 |
_version_ | 1784689965198737408 |
---|---|
author | van Veenendaal, Haske Peters, Loes J Ubbink, Dirk T Stubenrouch, Fabienne E Stiggelbout, Anne M Brand, Paul LP Vreugdenhil, Gerard Hilders, Carina GJM |
author_facet | van Veenendaal, Haske Peters, Loes J Ubbink, Dirk T Stubenrouch, Fabienne E Stiggelbout, Anne M Brand, Paul LP Vreugdenhil, Gerard Hilders, Carina GJM |
author_sort | van Veenendaal, Haske |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is particularly important in oncology as many treatments involve serious side effects, and treatment decisions involve a trade-off between benefits and risks. However, the implementation of SDM in oncology care is challenging, and clinicians state that it is difficult to apply SDM in their actual workplace. Training clinicians is known to be an effective means of improving SDM but is considered time consuming. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address the effectiveness of an individual SDM training program using the concept of deliberate practice. METHODS: This multicenter, single-blinded randomized clinical trial will be performed at 12 Dutch hospitals. Clinicians involved in decisions with oncology patients will be invited to participate in the study and allocated to the control or intervention group. All clinicians will record 3 decision-making processes with 3 different oncology patients. Clinicians in the intervention group will receive the following SDM intervention: completing e-learning, reflecting on feedback reports, performing a self-assessment and defining 1 to 3 personal learning questions, and participating in face-to-face coaching. Clinicians in the control group will not receive the SDM intervention until the end of the study. The primary outcome will be the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process, as scored using the Observing Patient Involvement–5 instrument. As secondary outcomes, patients will rate their perceived involvement in decision-making, and the duration of the consultations will be registered. All participating clinicians and their patients will receive information about the study and complete an informed consent form beforehand. RESULTS: This trial was retrospectively registered on August 03, 2021. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethical review board (medical research ethics committee Delft and Leiden, the Netherlands [N20.170]). Recruitment and data collection procedures are ongoing and are expected to be completed by July 2022; we plan to complete data analyses by December 2022. As of February 2022, a total of 12 hospitals have been recruited to participate in the study, and 30 clinicians have started the SDM training program. CONCLUSIONS: This theory-based and blended approach will increase our knowledge of effective and feasible training methods for clinicians in the field of SDM. The intervention will be tailored to the context of individual clinicians and will target the knowledge, attitude, and skills of clinicians. The patients will also be involved in the design and implementation of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry NL9647; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9647 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35543 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9021945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90219452022-04-22 Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial van Veenendaal, Haske Peters, Loes J Ubbink, Dirk T Stubenrouch, Fabienne E Stiggelbout, Anne M Brand, Paul LP Vreugdenhil, Gerard Hilders, Carina GJM JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is particularly important in oncology as many treatments involve serious side effects, and treatment decisions involve a trade-off between benefits and risks. However, the implementation of SDM in oncology care is challenging, and clinicians state that it is difficult to apply SDM in their actual workplace. Training clinicians is known to be an effective means of improving SDM but is considered time consuming. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address the effectiveness of an individual SDM training program using the concept of deliberate practice. METHODS: This multicenter, single-blinded randomized clinical trial will be performed at 12 Dutch hospitals. Clinicians involved in decisions with oncology patients will be invited to participate in the study and allocated to the control or intervention group. All clinicians will record 3 decision-making processes with 3 different oncology patients. Clinicians in the intervention group will receive the following SDM intervention: completing e-learning, reflecting on feedback reports, performing a self-assessment and defining 1 to 3 personal learning questions, and participating in face-to-face coaching. Clinicians in the control group will not receive the SDM intervention until the end of the study. The primary outcome will be the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process, as scored using the Observing Patient Involvement–5 instrument. As secondary outcomes, patients will rate their perceived involvement in decision-making, and the duration of the consultations will be registered. All participating clinicians and their patients will receive information about the study and complete an informed consent form beforehand. RESULTS: This trial was retrospectively registered on August 03, 2021. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethical review board (medical research ethics committee Delft and Leiden, the Netherlands [N20.170]). Recruitment and data collection procedures are ongoing and are expected to be completed by July 2022; we plan to complete data analyses by December 2022. As of February 2022, a total of 12 hospitals have been recruited to participate in the study, and 30 clinicians have started the SDM training program. CONCLUSIONS: This theory-based and blended approach will increase our knowledge of effective and feasible training methods for clinicians in the field of SDM. The intervention will be tailored to the context of individual clinicians and will target the knowledge, attitude, and skills of clinicians. The patients will also be involved in the design and implementation of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry NL9647; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9647 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35543 JMIR Publications 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9021945/ /pubmed/35383572 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35543 Text en ©Haske van Veenendaal, Loes J Peters, Dirk T Ubbink, Fabienne E Stubenrouch, Anne M Stiggelbout, Paul LP Brand, Gerard Vreugdenhil, Carina GJM Hilders. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 06.04.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol van Veenendaal, Haske Peters, Loes J Ubbink, Dirk T Stubenrouch, Fabienne E Stiggelbout, Anne M Brand, Paul LP Vreugdenhil, Gerard Hilders, Carina GJM Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of individual feedback and coaching on shared decision-making consultations in oncology care: protocol for a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383572 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanveenendaalhaske effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT petersloesj effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ubbinkdirkt effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT stubenrouchfabiennee effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT stiggelboutannem effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT brandpaullp effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT vreugdenhilgerard effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial AT hilderscarinagjm effectivenessofindividualfeedbackandcoachingonshareddecisionmakingconsultationsinoncologycareprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial |