Cargando…

Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis

Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capoglu, Recayi, Gonullu, Emre, Bayhan, Zulfu, Coskun, Murat, Harmantepe, Tarık, Kucuk, Furkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y
_version_ 1784689983619072000
author Capoglu, Recayi
Gonullu, Emre
Bayhan, Zulfu
Coskun, Murat
Harmantepe, Tarık
Kucuk, Furkan
author_facet Capoglu, Recayi
Gonullu, Emre
Bayhan, Zulfu
Coskun, Murat
Harmantepe, Tarık
Kucuk, Furkan
author_sort Capoglu, Recayi
collection PubMed
description Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females. This present study aims to compare the Lintula, Ripasa, Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems, which use gender as a variable, with the Alvarado, Karaman, scoring systems to evaluate which CSS is more successful in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in females. We analyzed the records of the patients operated on with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between 2020 and 2021, retrospectively. Alvarado, adult appendicitis score (AAS), appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIRS), Ripasa, Karaman, Lintula, and Fenyo Lindberg scores were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups as male and female, according to gender. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best cut-off value and assess the performance of the test score for appendicitis. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy-two (47.4%) of the patients were male, and 191 (52.6%) were female. Alvarado and AAS were the most valuable score in female (AUC: 0.805, sensitivity: 0.63, specificity: 0.83; and area under curve (AUC): 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively), male group (AUC: 0.828, Sensitivity: 0.71, Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.834, Sensitivity 0.74, Specificity: 0.77, respectively), and when patients were not categorized by gender (AUC: 0.818, Sensitivity: 0.67 Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively). Although the Alvarado scoring system is the first defined appendicitis scoring system, it seems as superior to the many scoring systems defined after it in predicting appendicitis, even in female patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9022019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90220192022-04-21 Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis Capoglu, Recayi Gonullu, Emre Bayhan, Zulfu Coskun, Murat Harmantepe, Tarık Kucuk, Furkan Updates Surg Original Article Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females. This present study aims to compare the Lintula, Ripasa, Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems, which use gender as a variable, with the Alvarado, Karaman, scoring systems to evaluate which CSS is more successful in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in females. We analyzed the records of the patients operated on with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between 2020 and 2021, retrospectively. Alvarado, adult appendicitis score (AAS), appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIRS), Ripasa, Karaman, Lintula, and Fenyo Lindberg scores were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups as male and female, according to gender. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best cut-off value and assess the performance of the test score for appendicitis. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy-two (47.4%) of the patients were male, and 191 (52.6%) were female. Alvarado and AAS were the most valuable score in female (AUC: 0.805, sensitivity: 0.63, specificity: 0.83; and area under curve (AUC): 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively), male group (AUC: 0.828, Sensitivity: 0.71, Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.834, Sensitivity 0.74, Specificity: 0.77, respectively), and when patients were not categorized by gender (AUC: 0.818, Sensitivity: 0.67 Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively). Although the Alvarado scoring system is the first defined appendicitis scoring system, it seems as superior to the many scoring systems defined after it in predicting appendicitis, even in female patients. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9022019/ /pubmed/35446009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y Text en © Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Capoglu, Recayi
Gonullu, Emre
Bayhan, Zulfu
Coskun, Murat
Harmantepe, Tarık
Kucuk, Furkan
Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title_full Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title_fullStr Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title_short Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
title_sort comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y
work_keys_str_mv AT capoglurecayi comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis
AT gonulluemre comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis
AT bayhanzulfu comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis
AT coskunmurat comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis
AT harmantepetarık comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis
AT kucukfurkan comparisonofscoringsystemsregardingthegenderasaparameterwiththetraditionalscoringsystemsforpredictingappendicitis