Cargando…
Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial
BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccines provide better protection against influenza infection than standard-dose in persons aged 65 years and above; however, in most countries, high-dose vaccines are not widely implemented. Assessing the relative effectiveness of high-dose compared to standard-dose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01044-w |
_version_ | 1784689984198934528 |
---|---|
author | Johansen, Niklas Dyrby Modin, Daniel Nealon, Joshua Samson, Sandrine Salamand, Camille Larsen, Carsten Schade Claggett, Brian L. Solomon, Scott D. Landray, Martin J. Gislason, Gunnar H. Køber, Lars Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Sivapalan, Pradeesh Vestergaard, Lasse Skafte Valentiner-Branth, Palle Krause, Tyra Grove Biering-Sørensen, Tor |
author_facet | Johansen, Niklas Dyrby Modin, Daniel Nealon, Joshua Samson, Sandrine Salamand, Camille Larsen, Carsten Schade Claggett, Brian L. Solomon, Scott D. Landray, Martin J. Gislason, Gunnar H. Køber, Lars Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Sivapalan, Pradeesh Vestergaard, Lasse Skafte Valentiner-Branth, Palle Krause, Tyra Grove Biering-Sørensen, Tor |
author_sort | Johansen, Niklas Dyrby |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccines provide better protection against influenza infection than standard-dose in persons aged 65 years and above; however, in most countries, high-dose vaccines are not widely implemented. Assessing the relative effectiveness of high-dose compared to standard-dose vaccines on hospitalizations and mortality would enable more robust public health and cost-effectiveness estimates. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in Denmark comparing high-dose to standard-dose vaccines utilizing existing vaccination infrastructure and the Danish nationwide health registries for data collection. METHODS: The DANFLU-1 trial (NCT05048589) is a pragmatic, open-label, active-controlled randomized trial randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to either high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine or standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine. The study utilizes the infrastructure of a private vaccination provider (Danske Lægers Vaccinations Service) for recruitment, inclusion, randomization, and vaccination. All collection of baseline and follow-up data including safety monitoring is performed centrally by the Department of Cardiology at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark using the Danish nationwide health registries. The study aims to include 40,000 participants during the 2021/2022 influenza season. The primary endpoints address feasibility and include the number of participants enrolled, randomization balance, and representativeness compared to the Danish general population. Relative vaccine effectiveness will also be assessed, however, this feasibility study is not powered for clinical outcomes and may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. DISCUSSION: The DANFLU-1 study is investigating the feasibility of conducting a large-scale pragmatic clinical trial in Denmark utilizing existing infrastructure and the Danish nationwide registries. This will provide valuable insight, especially for potential future fully powered vaccine trials, but also for trials wishing to investigate other interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05048589, registered September 17, 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9022021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90220212022-04-21 Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial Johansen, Niklas Dyrby Modin, Daniel Nealon, Joshua Samson, Sandrine Salamand, Camille Larsen, Carsten Schade Claggett, Brian L. Solomon, Scott D. Landray, Martin J. Gislason, Gunnar H. Køber, Lars Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Sivapalan, Pradeesh Vestergaard, Lasse Skafte Valentiner-Branth, Palle Krause, Tyra Grove Biering-Sørensen, Tor Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccines provide better protection against influenza infection than standard-dose in persons aged 65 years and above; however, in most countries, high-dose vaccines are not widely implemented. Assessing the relative effectiveness of high-dose compared to standard-dose vaccines on hospitalizations and mortality would enable more robust public health and cost-effectiveness estimates. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in Denmark comparing high-dose to standard-dose vaccines utilizing existing vaccination infrastructure and the Danish nationwide health registries for data collection. METHODS: The DANFLU-1 trial (NCT05048589) is a pragmatic, open-label, active-controlled randomized trial randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to either high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine or standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine. The study utilizes the infrastructure of a private vaccination provider (Danske Lægers Vaccinations Service) for recruitment, inclusion, randomization, and vaccination. All collection of baseline and follow-up data including safety monitoring is performed centrally by the Department of Cardiology at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark using the Danish nationwide health registries. The study aims to include 40,000 participants during the 2021/2022 influenza season. The primary endpoints address feasibility and include the number of participants enrolled, randomization balance, and representativeness compared to the Danish general population. Relative vaccine effectiveness will also be assessed, however, this feasibility study is not powered for clinical outcomes and may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. DISCUSSION: The DANFLU-1 study is investigating the feasibility of conducting a large-scale pragmatic clinical trial in Denmark utilizing existing infrastructure and the Danish nationwide registries. This will provide valuable insight, especially for potential future fully powered vaccine trials, but also for trials wishing to investigate other interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05048589, registered September 17, 2021. BioMed Central 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9022021/ /pubmed/35449028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01044-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Johansen, Niklas Dyrby Modin, Daniel Nealon, Joshua Samson, Sandrine Salamand, Camille Larsen, Carsten Schade Claggett, Brian L. Solomon, Scott D. Landray, Martin J. Gislason, Gunnar H. Køber, Lars Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Sivapalan, Pradeesh Vestergaard, Lasse Skafte Valentiner-Branth, Palle Krause, Tyra Grove Biering-Sørensen, Tor Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title | Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title_full | Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title_short | Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial |
title_sort | feasibility of randomizing danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the danflu-1 trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01044-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johansenniklasdyrby feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT modindaniel feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT nealonjoshua feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT samsonsandrine feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT salamandcamille feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT larsencarstenschade feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT claggettbrianl feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT solomonscottd feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT landraymartinj feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT gislasongunnarh feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT køberlars feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT jensenjensulrikstæhr feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT sivapalanpradeesh feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT vestergaardlasseskafte feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT valentinerbranthpalle feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT krausetyragrove feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial AT bieringsørensentor feasibilityofrandomizingdanishcitizensaged6579yearstohighdosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccinevsstandarddosequadrivalentinfluenzavaccineinapragmaticregistrybasedsettingrationaleanddesignofthedanflu1trial |