Cargando…
The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021
As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03384-w |
_version_ | 1784690056286437376 |
---|---|
author | Ascierto, Paolo A. Butterfield, Lisa H. Finn, Olivera J. Futreal, Andrew Hamid, Omid LaVallee, Theresa Postow, Michael A. Puzanov, Igor Sosman, Jeffrey Fox, Bernard A. Hwu, Patrick |
author_facet | Ascierto, Paolo A. Butterfield, Lisa H. Finn, Olivera J. Futreal, Andrew Hamid, Omid LaVallee, Theresa Postow, Michael A. Puzanov, Igor Sosman, Jeffrey Fox, Bernard A. Hwu, Patrick |
author_sort | Ascierto, Paolo A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9022317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90223172022-04-22 The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 Ascierto, Paolo A. Butterfield, Lisa H. Finn, Olivera J. Futreal, Andrew Hamid, Omid LaVallee, Theresa Postow, Michael A. Puzanov, Igor Sosman, Jeffrey Fox, Bernard A. Hwu, Patrick J Transl Med Meeting Report As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker. BioMed Central 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9022317/ /pubmed/35449104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03384-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Meeting Report Ascierto, Paolo A. Butterfield, Lisa H. Finn, Olivera J. Futreal, Andrew Hamid, Omid LaVallee, Theresa Postow, Michael A. Puzanov, Igor Sosman, Jeffrey Fox, Bernard A. Hwu, Patrick The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title | The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title_full | The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title_fullStr | The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title_short | The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st–2nd, 2021 |
title_sort | “great debate” at immunotherapy bridge 2021, december 1st–2nd, 2021 |
topic | Meeting Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03384-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asciertopaoloa thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT butterfieldlisah thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT finnoliveraj thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT futrealandrew thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT hamidomid thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT lavalleetheresa thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT postowmichaela thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT puzanovigor thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT sosmanjeffrey thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT foxbernarda thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT hwupatrick thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT asciertopaoloa greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT butterfieldlisah greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT finnoliveraj greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT futrealandrew greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT hamidomid greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT lavalleetheresa greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT postowmichaela greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT puzanovigor greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT sosmanjeffrey greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT foxbernarda greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 AT hwupatrick greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2021december1st2nd2021 |