Cargando…
Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Portland Press Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526 |
_version_ | 1784690229873999872 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Thomas Creutznacher, Robert Maass, Thorben Mallagaray, Alvaro Ogrissek, Patrick Taube, Stefan Thiede, Lars Uetrecht, Charlotte |
author_facet | Peters, Thomas Creutznacher, Robert Maass, Thorben Mallagaray, Alvaro Ogrissek, Patrick Taube, Stefan Thiede, Lars Uetrecht, Charlotte |
author_sort | Peters, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresponding binding affinities have been determined for HBGAs and other glycans exploiting different biophysical techniques, with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy being most widely used. However, reported binding affinities are inconsistent. At the extreme, for the same system MS detects binding whereas NMR spectroscopy does not, suggesting a fundamental source of error. In this short essay, we will explain the reason for the observed differences and compile reliable and reproducible binding affinities. We will then highlight how a combination of MS techniques and NMR experiments affords unique insights into the process of HBGA binding by norovirus capsid proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9022987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Portland Press Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90229872022-05-03 Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? Peters, Thomas Creutznacher, Robert Maass, Thorben Mallagaray, Alvaro Ogrissek, Patrick Taube, Stefan Thiede, Lars Uetrecht, Charlotte Biochem Soc Trans Review Articles Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresponding binding affinities have been determined for HBGAs and other glycans exploiting different biophysical techniques, with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy being most widely used. However, reported binding affinities are inconsistent. At the extreme, for the same system MS detects binding whereas NMR spectroscopy does not, suggesting a fundamental source of error. In this short essay, we will explain the reason for the observed differences and compile reliable and reproducible binding affinities. We will then highlight how a combination of MS techniques and NMR experiments affords unique insights into the process of HBGA binding by norovirus capsid proteins. Portland Press Ltd. 2022-02-28 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9022987/ /pubmed/34940787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Peters, Thomas Creutznacher, Robert Maass, Thorben Mallagaray, Alvaro Ogrissek, Patrick Taube, Stefan Thiede, Lars Uetrecht, Charlotte Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title | Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title_full | Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title_fullStr | Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title_full_unstemmed | Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title_short | Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
title_sort | norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersthomas norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT creutznacherrobert norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT maassthorben norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT mallagarayalvaro norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT ogrissekpatrick norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT taubestefan norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT thiedelars norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally AT uetrechtcharlotte norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally |