Cargando…

Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?

Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Thomas, Creutznacher, Robert, Maass, Thorben, Mallagaray, Alvaro, Ogrissek, Patrick, Taube, Stefan, Thiede, Lars, Uetrecht, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526
_version_ 1784690229873999872
author Peters, Thomas
Creutznacher, Robert
Maass, Thorben
Mallagaray, Alvaro
Ogrissek, Patrick
Taube, Stefan
Thiede, Lars
Uetrecht, Charlotte
author_facet Peters, Thomas
Creutznacher, Robert
Maass, Thorben
Mallagaray, Alvaro
Ogrissek, Patrick
Taube, Stefan
Thiede, Lars
Uetrecht, Charlotte
author_sort Peters, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresponding binding affinities have been determined for HBGAs and other glycans exploiting different biophysical techniques, with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy being most widely used. However, reported binding affinities are inconsistent. At the extreme, for the same system MS detects binding whereas NMR spectroscopy does not, suggesting a fundamental source of error. In this short essay, we will explain the reason for the observed differences and compile reliable and reproducible binding affinities. We will then highlight how a combination of MS techniques and NMR experiments affords unique insights into the process of HBGA binding by norovirus capsid proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9022987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90229872022-05-03 Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really? Peters, Thomas Creutznacher, Robert Maass, Thorben Mallagaray, Alvaro Ogrissek, Patrick Taube, Stefan Thiede, Lars Uetrecht, Charlotte Biochem Soc Trans Review Articles Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresponding binding affinities have been determined for HBGAs and other glycans exploiting different biophysical techniques, with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy being most widely used. However, reported binding affinities are inconsistent. At the extreme, for the same system MS detects binding whereas NMR spectroscopy does not, suggesting a fundamental source of error. In this short essay, we will explain the reason for the observed differences and compile reliable and reproducible binding affinities. We will then highlight how a combination of MS techniques and NMR experiments affords unique insights into the process of HBGA binding by norovirus capsid proteins. Portland Press Ltd. 2022-02-28 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9022987/ /pubmed/34940787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Articles
Peters, Thomas
Creutznacher, Robert
Maass, Thorben
Mallagaray, Alvaro
Ogrissek, Patrick
Taube, Stefan
Thiede, Lars
Uetrecht, Charlotte
Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title_full Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title_fullStr Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title_full_unstemmed Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title_short Norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
title_sort norovirus–glycan interactions — how strong are they really?
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20210526
work_keys_str_mv AT petersthomas norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT creutznacherrobert norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT maassthorben norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT mallagarayalvaro norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT ogrissekpatrick norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT taubestefan norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT thiedelars norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally
AT uetrechtcharlotte norovirusglycaninteractionshowstrongaretheyreally