Cargando…
Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control
IMPORTANCE: Screening and vaccination are essential in the fight against infectious diseases, but need to be integrated and customized based on community and disease characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To develop effective screening and vaccination strategies, customized for a college campus, to reduce COVI...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267388 |
_version_ | 1784690251324719104 |
---|---|
author | Rabil, Marie Jeanne Tunc, Sait Bish, Douglas R. Bish, Ebru K. |
author_facet | Rabil, Marie Jeanne Tunc, Sait Bish, Douglas R. Bish, Ebru K. |
author_sort | Rabil, Marie Jeanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Screening and vaccination are essential in the fight against infectious diseases, but need to be integrated and customized based on community and disease characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To develop effective screening and vaccination strategies, customized for a college campus, to reduce COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, deaths, and peak hospitalizations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We construct a compartmental model of disease spread under vaccination and routine screening, and study the efficacy of four mitigation strategies (routine screening only, vaccination only, vaccination with partial or full routine screening), and a no-intervention strategy. The study setting is a hypothetical college campus of 5,000 students and 455 faculty members during the Fall 2021 academic semester, when the Delta variant was the predominant strain. For sensitivity analysis, we vary the screening frequency, daily vaccination rate, initial vaccine coverage, and screening and vaccination compliance; and consider scenarios that represent low/medium/high transmission and test efficacy. Model parameters come from publicly available or published sources. RESULTS: With low initial vaccine coverage (30% in our study), even aggressive vaccination and screening result in a high number of infections: 1,020 to 2,040 (1,530 to 2,480) with routine daily (every other day) screening of the unvaccinated; 280 to 900 with daily screening extended to the newly vaccinated in base- and worst-case scenarios, which respectively consider reproduction numbers of 4.75 and 6.75 for the Delta variant. CONCLUSION: Integrated vaccination and routine screening can allow for a safe opening of a college when both the vaccine effectiveness and the initial vaccine coverage are sufficiently high. The interventions need to be customized considering the initial vaccine coverage, estimated compliance, screening and vaccination capacity, disease transmission and adverse outcome rates, and the number of infections/peak hospitalizations the college is willing to tolerate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9023060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90230602022-04-22 Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control Rabil, Marie Jeanne Tunc, Sait Bish, Douglas R. Bish, Ebru K. PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: Screening and vaccination are essential in the fight against infectious diseases, but need to be integrated and customized based on community and disease characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To develop effective screening and vaccination strategies, customized for a college campus, to reduce COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, deaths, and peak hospitalizations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We construct a compartmental model of disease spread under vaccination and routine screening, and study the efficacy of four mitigation strategies (routine screening only, vaccination only, vaccination with partial or full routine screening), and a no-intervention strategy. The study setting is a hypothetical college campus of 5,000 students and 455 faculty members during the Fall 2021 academic semester, when the Delta variant was the predominant strain. For sensitivity analysis, we vary the screening frequency, daily vaccination rate, initial vaccine coverage, and screening and vaccination compliance; and consider scenarios that represent low/medium/high transmission and test efficacy. Model parameters come from publicly available or published sources. RESULTS: With low initial vaccine coverage (30% in our study), even aggressive vaccination and screening result in a high number of infections: 1,020 to 2,040 (1,530 to 2,480) with routine daily (every other day) screening of the unvaccinated; 280 to 900 with daily screening extended to the newly vaccinated in base- and worst-case scenarios, which respectively consider reproduction numbers of 4.75 and 6.75 for the Delta variant. CONCLUSION: Integrated vaccination and routine screening can allow for a safe opening of a college when both the vaccine effectiveness and the initial vaccine coverage are sufficiently high. The interventions need to be customized considering the initial vaccine coverage, estimated compliance, screening and vaccination capacity, disease transmission and adverse outcome rates, and the number of infections/peak hospitalizations the college is willing to tolerate. Public Library of Science 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9023060/ /pubmed/35446872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267388 Text en © 2022 Rabil et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rabil, Marie Jeanne Tunc, Sait Bish, Douglas R. Bish, Ebru K. Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title | Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title_full | Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title_fullStr | Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title_short | Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
title_sort | benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rabilmariejeanne benefitsofintegratedscreeningandvaccinationforinfectioncontrol AT tuncsait benefitsofintegratedscreeningandvaccinationforinfectioncontrol AT bishdouglasr benefitsofintegratedscreeningandvaccinationforinfectioncontrol AT bishebruk benefitsofintegratedscreeningandvaccinationforinfectioncontrol |