Cargando…

The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging

The cognitive reserve (CR) is widely accepted as the active ability to cope with brain damage, using preexisting cognitive and compensatory processes. The common CR proxies used are the number of formal years of education, intelligence quotient (IQ) or premorbid functioning, occupation attainment, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogueira, Joana, Gerardo, Bianca, Santana, Isabel, Simões, Mário R., Freitas, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847186
_version_ 1784690268718497792
author Nogueira, Joana
Gerardo, Bianca
Santana, Isabel
Simões, Mário R.
Freitas, Sandra
author_facet Nogueira, Joana
Gerardo, Bianca
Santana, Isabel
Simões, Mário R.
Freitas, Sandra
author_sort Nogueira, Joana
collection PubMed
description The cognitive reserve (CR) is widely accepted as the active ability to cope with brain damage, using preexisting cognitive and compensatory processes. The common CR proxies used are the number of formal years of education, intelligence quotient (IQ) or premorbid functioning, occupation attainment, and participation in leisure activities. More recently, it has employed the level of literacy and engagement in high-level cognitive demand of professional activities. This study aims to identify and summarize published methodologies to assess the CR quantitatively. We searched for published studies on PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science between September 2018 and September 2021. We only included those studies that characterized the CR assessment methodology. The search strategy identified 1,285 publications, of which 25 were included. Most of the instruments targeted proxies individually. The lack of a gold standard tool that incorporates all proxies and cognitive tests highlights the need to develop a more holistic battery for the quantitative assessment of CR. Further studies should focus on a quantitative methodology that includes all these proxies supported by normative data to improve the use of CR as a valid measure in clinical contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9023121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90231212022-04-22 The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging Nogueira, Joana Gerardo, Bianca Santana, Isabel Simões, Mário R. Freitas, Sandra Front Psychol Psychology The cognitive reserve (CR) is widely accepted as the active ability to cope with brain damage, using preexisting cognitive and compensatory processes. The common CR proxies used are the number of formal years of education, intelligence quotient (IQ) or premorbid functioning, occupation attainment, and participation in leisure activities. More recently, it has employed the level of literacy and engagement in high-level cognitive demand of professional activities. This study aims to identify and summarize published methodologies to assess the CR quantitatively. We searched for published studies on PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science between September 2018 and September 2021. We only included those studies that characterized the CR assessment methodology. The search strategy identified 1,285 publications, of which 25 were included. Most of the instruments targeted proxies individually. The lack of a gold standard tool that incorporates all proxies and cognitive tests highlights the need to develop a more holistic battery for the quantitative assessment of CR. Further studies should focus on a quantitative methodology that includes all these proxies supported by normative data to improve the use of CR as a valid measure in clinical contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9023121/ /pubmed/35465541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847186 Text en Copyright © 2022 Nogueira, Gerardo, Santana, Simões and Freitas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Nogueira, Joana
Gerardo, Bianca
Santana, Isabel
Simões, Mário R.
Freitas, Sandra
The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title_full The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title_fullStr The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title_short The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging
title_sort assessment of cognitive reserve: a systematic review of the most used quantitative measurement methods of cognitive reserve for aging
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847186
work_keys_str_mv AT nogueirajoana theassessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT gerardobianca theassessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT santanaisabel theassessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT simoesmarior theassessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT freitassandra theassessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT nogueirajoana assessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT gerardobianca assessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT santanaisabel assessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT simoesmarior assessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging
AT freitassandra assessmentofcognitivereserveasystematicreviewofthemostusedquantitativemeasurementmethodsofcognitivereserveforaging