Cargando…

Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Compression garments are regularly worn during exercise to improve physical performance, mitigate fatigue responses, and enhance recovery. However, evidence for their efficacy is varied and the methodological approaches and outcome measures used within the scientific literature are diver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weakley, Jonathon, Broatch, James, O’Riordan, Shane, Morrison, Matthew, Maniar, Nirav, Halson, Shona L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9
_version_ 1784690346647617536
author Weakley, Jonathon
Broatch, James
O’Riordan, Shane
Morrison, Matthew
Maniar, Nirav
Halson, Shona L.
author_facet Weakley, Jonathon
Broatch, James
O’Riordan, Shane
Morrison, Matthew
Maniar, Nirav
Halson, Shona L.
author_sort Weakley, Jonathon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compression garments are regularly worn during exercise to improve physical performance, mitigate fatigue responses, and enhance recovery. However, evidence for their efficacy is varied and the methodological approaches and outcome measures used within the scientific literature are diverse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of compression garments on commonly assessed outcome measures in response to exercise, including: performance, biomechanical, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory, muscle damage, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete) was performed from the earliest record to 27 December, 2020. RESULTS: In total, 183 studies were identified for qualitative analysis with the following breakdown: performance and muscle function outcomes: 115 studies (63%), biomechanical and neuromuscular: 59 (32%), blood and saliva markers: 85 (46%), cardiovascular: 76 (42%), cardiorespiratory: 39 (21%), thermoregulatory: 19 (10%) and perceptual: 98 (54%). Approximately 85% (n = 156) of studies were published between 2010 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is equivocal as to whether garments improve physical performance, with little evidence supporting improvements in kinetic or kinematic outcomes. Compression likely reduces muscle oscillatory properties and has a positive effect on sensorimotor systems. Findings suggest potential increases in arterial blood flow; however, it is unlikely that compression garments meaningfully change metabolic responses, blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiorespiratory measures. Compression garments increase localised skin temperature and may reduce perceptions of muscle soreness and pain following exercise; however, rating of perceived exertion during exercise is likely unchanged. It is unlikely that compression garments negatively influence exercise-related outcomes. Future research should assess wearer belief in compression garments, report pressure ranges at multiple sites as well as garment material, and finally examine individual responses and varying compression coverage areas. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9023423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90234232022-05-06 Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review Weakley, Jonathon Broatch, James O’Riordan, Shane Morrison, Matthew Maniar, Nirav Halson, Shona L. Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Compression garments are regularly worn during exercise to improve physical performance, mitigate fatigue responses, and enhance recovery. However, evidence for their efficacy is varied and the methodological approaches and outcome measures used within the scientific literature are diverse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of compression garments on commonly assessed outcome measures in response to exercise, including: performance, biomechanical, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory, muscle damage, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete) was performed from the earliest record to 27 December, 2020. RESULTS: In total, 183 studies were identified for qualitative analysis with the following breakdown: performance and muscle function outcomes: 115 studies (63%), biomechanical and neuromuscular: 59 (32%), blood and saliva markers: 85 (46%), cardiovascular: 76 (42%), cardiorespiratory: 39 (21%), thermoregulatory: 19 (10%) and perceptual: 98 (54%). Approximately 85% (n = 156) of studies were published between 2010 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is equivocal as to whether garments improve physical performance, with little evidence supporting improvements in kinetic or kinematic outcomes. Compression likely reduces muscle oscillatory properties and has a positive effect on sensorimotor systems. Findings suggest potential increases in arterial blood flow; however, it is unlikely that compression garments meaningfully change metabolic responses, blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiorespiratory measures. Compression garments increase localised skin temperature and may reduce perceptions of muscle soreness and pain following exercise; however, rating of perceived exertion during exercise is likely unchanged. It is unlikely that compression garments negatively influence exercise-related outcomes. Future research should assess wearer belief in compression garments, report pressure ranges at multiple sites as well as garment material, and finally examine individual responses and varying compression coverage areas. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9023423/ /pubmed/34870801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Weakley, Jonathon
Broatch, James
O’Riordan, Shane
Morrison, Matthew
Maniar, Nirav
Halson, Shona L.
Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_fullStr Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_short Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_sort putting the squeeze on compression garments: current evidence and recommendations for future research: a systematic scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9
work_keys_str_mv AT weakleyjonathon puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview
AT broatchjames puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview
AT oriordanshane puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview
AT morrisonmatthew puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview
AT maniarnirav puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview
AT halsonshonal puttingthesqueezeoncompressiongarmentscurrentevidenceandrecommendationsforfutureresearchasystematicscopingreview