Cargando…

Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romano, Vito, Parekh, Mohit, Kazaili, Ahmed, Steger, Bernhard, Akhtar, Riaz, Ferrari, Stefano, Kaye, Stephen B, Levis, Hannah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086230
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20
_version_ 1784690450019385344
author Romano, Vito
Parekh, Mohit
Kazaili, Ahmed
Steger, Bernhard
Akhtar, Riaz
Ferrari, Stefano
Kaye, Stephen B
Levis, Hannah J
author_facet Romano, Vito
Parekh, Mohit
Kazaili, Ahmed
Steger, Bernhard
Akhtar, Riaz
Ferrari, Stefano
Kaye, Stephen B
Levis, Hannah J
author_sort Romano, Vito
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon-cut DSAEK and b) eye bank-prepared (pre-cut and pre-loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO-1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. RESULTS: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon-cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre-cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre-loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO-1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre-cut and pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon-cut DSAEK compared to pre-cut (P < 0.0001) or pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). CONCLUSION: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank-prepared DSAEK grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9023930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90239302022-04-23 Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study Romano, Vito Parekh, Mohit Kazaili, Ahmed Steger, Bernhard Akhtar, Riaz Ferrari, Stefano Kaye, Stephen B Levis, Hannah J Indian J Ophthalmol Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon-cut DSAEK and b) eye bank-prepared (pre-cut and pre-loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO-1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. RESULTS: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon-cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre-cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre-loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO-1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre-cut and pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon-cut DSAEK compared to pre-cut (P < 0.0001) or pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). CONCLUSION: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank-prepared DSAEK grafts. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-02 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9023930/ /pubmed/35086230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article
Romano, Vito
Parekh, Mohit
Kazaili, Ahmed
Steger, Bernhard
Akhtar, Riaz
Ferrari, Stefano
Kaye, Stephen B
Levis, Hannah J
Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title_full Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title_fullStr Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title_short Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
title_sort eye bank versus surgeon prepared descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
topic Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086230
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20
work_keys_str_mv AT romanovito eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT parekhmohit eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT kazailiahmed eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT stegerbernhard eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT akhtarriaz eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT ferraristefano eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT kayestephenb eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy
AT levishannahj eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy