Cargando…
Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20 |
_version_ | 1784690450019385344 |
---|---|
author | Romano, Vito Parekh, Mohit Kazaili, Ahmed Steger, Bernhard Akhtar, Riaz Ferrari, Stefano Kaye, Stephen B Levis, Hannah J |
author_facet | Romano, Vito Parekh, Mohit Kazaili, Ahmed Steger, Bernhard Akhtar, Riaz Ferrari, Stefano Kaye, Stephen B Levis, Hannah J |
author_sort | Romano, Vito |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon-cut DSAEK and b) eye bank-prepared (pre-cut and pre-loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO-1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. RESULTS: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon-cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre-cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre-loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO-1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre-cut and pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon-cut DSAEK compared to pre-cut (P < 0.0001) or pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). CONCLUSION: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank-prepared DSAEK grafts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9023930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90239302022-04-23 Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study Romano, Vito Parekh, Mohit Kazaili, Ahmed Steger, Bernhard Akhtar, Riaz Ferrari, Stefano Kaye, Stephen B Levis, Hannah J Indian J Ophthalmol Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon-cut DSAEK and b) eye bank-prepared (pre-cut and pre-loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO-1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. RESULTS: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon-cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre-cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre-loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO-1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre-cut and pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon-cut DSAEK compared to pre-cut (P < 0.0001) or pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). CONCLUSION: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank-prepared DSAEK grafts. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-02 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9023930/ /pubmed/35086230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article Romano, Vito Parekh, Mohit Kazaili, Ahmed Steger, Bernhard Akhtar, Riaz Ferrari, Stefano Kaye, Stephen B Levis, Hannah J Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title | Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title_full | Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title_short | Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
title_sort | eye bank versus surgeon prepared descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: influence on adhesion force in a pilot study |
topic | Special Focus, Cornea, Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35086230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3637_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romanovito eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT parekhmohit eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT kazailiahmed eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT stegerbernhard eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT akhtarriaz eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT ferraristefano eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT kayestephenb eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy AT levishannahj eyebankversussurgeonprepareddescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastytissuesinfluenceonadhesionforceinapilotstudy |