Cargando…

Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Engaging patients, carers and members of the public in health research has become widely recognised as an important approach for bridging the gap between research, and health and social care by increasing the relevance of research for those who benefit from its findings. Specific appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskinas, Elena, Gilfoyle, Meghan, Salsberg, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059048
_version_ 1784690530199797760
author Koskinas, Elena
Gilfoyle, Meghan
Salsberg, Jon
author_facet Koskinas, Elena
Gilfoyle, Meghan
Salsberg, Jon
author_sort Koskinas, Elena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Engaging patients, carers and members of the public in health research has become widely recognised as an important approach for bridging the gap between research, and health and social care by increasing the relevance of research for those who benefit from its findings. Specific approaches to engagement vary, but commonly include advisory boards, groups or patient panels that are active throughout all stages of research. The breadth of and optimal strategies for recruiting patients, carers and members of the public to such boards, groups or panels remains unclear. The objective of this manuscript is to identify the breadth of and optimal strategies used to recruit patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups or panels, within public and patient involvement (PPI) research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review follows the scoping review framework by Peters et al, an elaboration on the framework by Arksey and O’Malley. The search strategy was co-developed among the research team, PPI research experts and a faculty librarian. The review will take place between July 2021 and June 2022. In July and August 2021, eight electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, will be explored to capture all available literature. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by title and abstract and then at full text based on predetermined criteria. The data will be presented in a tabular format with a narrative summary discussing how the research findings relate to the overarching research question. A thematic analysis will also be completed using qualitative description, identifying key themes and gaps in the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics is not required for this review. We aim to disseminate the information gathered through presentations at academic conferences, peer-reviewed publications and consultations with lay audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9024234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90242342022-05-06 Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol Koskinas, Elena Gilfoyle, Meghan Salsberg, Jon BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Engaging patients, carers and members of the public in health research has become widely recognised as an important approach for bridging the gap between research, and health and social care by increasing the relevance of research for those who benefit from its findings. Specific approaches to engagement vary, but commonly include advisory boards, groups or patient panels that are active throughout all stages of research. The breadth of and optimal strategies for recruiting patients, carers and members of the public to such boards, groups or panels remains unclear. The objective of this manuscript is to identify the breadth of and optimal strategies used to recruit patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups or panels, within public and patient involvement (PPI) research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review follows the scoping review framework by Peters et al, an elaboration on the framework by Arksey and O’Malley. The search strategy was co-developed among the research team, PPI research experts and a faculty librarian. The review will take place between July 2021 and June 2022. In July and August 2021, eight electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, will be explored to capture all available literature. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by title and abstract and then at full text based on predetermined criteria. The data will be presented in a tabular format with a narrative summary discussing how the research findings relate to the overarching research question. A thematic analysis will also be completed using qualitative description, identifying key themes and gaps in the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics is not required for this review. We aim to disseminate the information gathered through presentations at academic conferences, peer-reviewed publications and consultations with lay audiences. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9024234/ /pubmed/35450910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059048 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Koskinas, Elena
Gilfoyle, Meghan
Salsberg, Jon
Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title_full Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title_short Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
title_sort exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059048
work_keys_str_mv AT koskinaselena exploringhowpatientscarersandmembersofthepublicarerecruitedtoadvisoryboardsgroupsandpanelsaspartnersinpublicandpatientinvolvedhealthresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT gilfoylemeghan exploringhowpatientscarersandmembersofthepublicarerecruitedtoadvisoryboardsgroupsandpanelsaspartnersinpublicandpatientinvolvedhealthresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT salsbergjon exploringhowpatientscarersandmembersofthepublicarerecruitedtoadvisoryboardsgroupsandpanelsaspartnersinpublicandpatientinvolvedhealthresearchascopingreviewprotocol