Cargando…
Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation
Successful innovations are deemed to be necessary requisites for enterprise success. On the other hand, works council participation (“co-determination” in Germany) and employee participation are judged differently as either fostering employee and enterprise benefits or only the former or even none....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795143 |
_version_ | 1784690550305193984 |
---|---|
author | Breitling, Kai Scholl, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Breitling, Kai Scholl, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Breitling, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful innovations are deemed to be necessary requisites for enterprise success. On the other hand, works council participation (“co-determination” in Germany) and employee participation are judged differently as either fostering employee and enterprise benefits or only the former or even none. Both forms of participation have found diverging theoretical and empirical argumentations regarding innovations. Here, we argue and show empirically that both forms of participation deliver positive contributions to innovation success, economically and employee-related, substantiated with qualitative reports from 36 process innovation cases and quantitative data from 44 cases. Qualitative case analyses reveal different profiles of works council participation depending on the innovation type. Independent of the innovation types, more successful innovations are marked by more intensive participation. Quantitative examinations of a causal model with path analysis specify how this is achieved: works council and employee participation further the growth of appropriate knowledge and the former also raises the coordination capability; both are essential preconditions for innovation success. A direct impact of works councils on innovation success complements the indirect effects. The slightly modified path analysis explains 53% of the innovation success variance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9024309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90243092022-04-23 Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation Breitling, Kai Scholl, Wolfgang Front Psychol Psychology Successful innovations are deemed to be necessary requisites for enterprise success. On the other hand, works council participation (“co-determination” in Germany) and employee participation are judged differently as either fostering employee and enterprise benefits or only the former or even none. Both forms of participation have found diverging theoretical and empirical argumentations regarding innovations. Here, we argue and show empirically that both forms of participation deliver positive contributions to innovation success, economically and employee-related, substantiated with qualitative reports from 36 process innovation cases and quantitative data from 44 cases. Qualitative case analyses reveal different profiles of works council participation depending on the innovation type. Independent of the innovation types, more successful innovations are marked by more intensive participation. Quantitative examinations of a causal model with path analysis specify how this is achieved: works council and employee participation further the growth of appropriate knowledge and the former also raises the coordination capability; both are essential preconditions for innovation success. A direct impact of works councils on innovation success complements the indirect effects. The slightly modified path analysis explains 53% of the innovation success variance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9024309/ /pubmed/35465510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795143 Text en Copyright © 2022 Breitling and Scholl. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Breitling, Kai Scholl, Wolfgang Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title | Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title_full | Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title_fullStr | Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title_full_unstemmed | Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title_short | Success of Process Innovations Through Active Works Council Participation |
title_sort | success of process innovations through active works council participation |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breitlingkai successofprocessinnovationsthroughactiveworkscouncilparticipation AT schollwolfgang successofprocessinnovationsthroughactiveworkscouncilparticipation |