Cargando…

Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefits in several solid cancers; still, glioblastoma remains very challenging to treat. Glioblastoma is the most frequent brain cancer and displays great heterogeneity. The standard of care has remained the same for over fifteen years, and to overco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mensali, Nadia, Inderberg, Else Marit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081940
_version_ 1784690679740366848
author Mensali, Nadia
Inderberg, Else Marit
author_facet Mensali, Nadia
Inderberg, Else Marit
author_sort Mensali, Nadia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefits in several solid cancers; still, glioblastoma remains very challenging to treat. Glioblastoma is the most frequent brain cancer and displays great heterogeneity. The standard of care has remained the same for over fifteen years, and to overcome the therapeutic limitations, emerging immune correlates of therapy responses and improved prognosis should be further developed for a more personalized therapy approach and increased clinical responses. ABSTRACT: Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefits in several solid malignancies—in particular, melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, in other solid tumours such as glioblastoma (GBM), the response to immunotherapy has been more variable, and except for anti-PD-1 for patients with microsatellite instable (MSI)+ cancers, no immunotherapy is currently approved for GBM patients. GBM is the most common and most aggressive brain cancer with a very poor prognosis and a median overall survival of 15 months. A few prognostic biomarkers have been identified and are used to some extent, but apart from MSI, no biomarkers are used for patient stratification for treatments other than the standard of care, which was established 15 years ago. Around 25% of new treatments investigated in GBM are immunotherapies. Recent studies indicate that the use of integrated and validated immune correlates predicting the response and guiding treatments could improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in GBM. In this review, we will give an overview of the current status of immunotherapy and biomarkers in use in GBM with the main challenges of treatment in this disease. We will also discuss emerging biomarkers that could be used in future immunotherapy strategies for patient stratification and potentially improved treatment efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9024739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90247392022-04-23 Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma Mensali, Nadia Inderberg, Else Marit Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefits in several solid cancers; still, glioblastoma remains very challenging to treat. Glioblastoma is the most frequent brain cancer and displays great heterogeneity. The standard of care has remained the same for over fifteen years, and to overcome the therapeutic limitations, emerging immune correlates of therapy responses and improved prognosis should be further developed for a more personalized therapy approach and increased clinical responses. ABSTRACT: Immunotherapy has shown clinical benefits in several solid malignancies—in particular, melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, in other solid tumours such as glioblastoma (GBM), the response to immunotherapy has been more variable, and except for anti-PD-1 for patients with microsatellite instable (MSI)+ cancers, no immunotherapy is currently approved for GBM patients. GBM is the most common and most aggressive brain cancer with a very poor prognosis and a median overall survival of 15 months. A few prognostic biomarkers have been identified and are used to some extent, but apart from MSI, no biomarkers are used for patient stratification for treatments other than the standard of care, which was established 15 years ago. Around 25% of new treatments investigated in GBM are immunotherapies. Recent studies indicate that the use of integrated and validated immune correlates predicting the response and guiding treatments could improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in GBM. In this review, we will give an overview of the current status of immunotherapy and biomarkers in use in GBM with the main challenges of treatment in this disease. We will also discuss emerging biomarkers that could be used in future immunotherapy strategies for patient stratification and potentially improved treatment efficacy. MDPI 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9024739/ /pubmed/35454848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081940 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mensali, Nadia
Inderberg, Else Marit
Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title_full Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title_fullStr Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title_short Emerging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma
title_sort emerging biomarkers for immunotherapy in glioblastoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081940
work_keys_str_mv AT mensalinadia emergingbiomarkersforimmunotherapyinglioblastoma
AT inderbergelsemarit emergingbiomarkersforimmunotherapyinglioblastoma