Cargando…
Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622 |
_version_ | 1784690728946892800 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Zhi-Qiang Wu, Jiang-Nan Huang, Rong-Dong Xie, Fang-Qin Li, Jun-Rong Zheng, Kui-Cheng Zhang, Dong-Juan |
author_facet | Lin, Zhi-Qiang Wu, Jiang-Nan Huang, Rong-Dong Xie, Fang-Qin Li, Jun-Rong Zheng, Kui-Cheng Zhang, Dong-Juan |
author_sort | Lin, Zhi-Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour common vaccines in China. In total, 320 eligible participants who had received two doses of an inactivated vaccine were equally allocated to receive a booster of the same vaccine (Group A), a different inactivated vaccine (Group B), an adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccine (Group C), or a protein subunit vaccine (Group D). A higher risk of adverse reactions, observed up to 28 days after injection, was found in Groups C and D, compared to Group A, with odds ratios (OR) of 11.63 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.22–32.05) and 4.38 (1.53–12.56), respectively. Recipients in Group C were more likely to report ≥two reactions (OR = 29.18, 95% CI: 3.70–229.82), and had a higher risk of injection site pain, dizziness, and fatigue. A gender and age disparity in the risk of adverse reactions was identified. Despite the majority of reactions being mild, heterologous booster strategies do increase the risk of adverse reactions, relative to homologous boosters, in subjects who have had two doses of inactive vaccine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9024909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90249092022-04-23 Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study Lin, Zhi-Qiang Wu, Jiang-Nan Huang, Rong-Dong Xie, Fang-Qin Li, Jun-Rong Zheng, Kui-Cheng Zhang, Dong-Juan Vaccines (Basel) Article A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour common vaccines in China. In total, 320 eligible participants who had received two doses of an inactivated vaccine were equally allocated to receive a booster of the same vaccine (Group A), a different inactivated vaccine (Group B), an adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccine (Group C), or a protein subunit vaccine (Group D). A higher risk of adverse reactions, observed up to 28 days after injection, was found in Groups C and D, compared to Group A, with odds ratios (OR) of 11.63 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.22–32.05) and 4.38 (1.53–12.56), respectively. Recipients in Group C were more likely to report ≥two reactions (OR = 29.18, 95% CI: 3.70–229.82), and had a higher risk of injection site pain, dizziness, and fatigue. A gender and age disparity in the risk of adverse reactions was identified. Despite the majority of reactions being mild, heterologous booster strategies do increase the risk of adverse reactions, relative to homologous boosters, in subjects who have had two doses of inactive vaccine. MDPI 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9024909/ /pubmed/35455370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Zhi-Qiang Wu, Jiang-Nan Huang, Rong-Dong Xie, Fang-Qin Li, Jun-Rong Zheng, Kui-Cheng Zhang, Dong-Juan Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title | Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title_full | Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title_short | Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study |
title_sort | comparison of safety of different vaccine boosters following two-dose inactivated vaccines: a parallel controlled prospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linzhiqiang comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT wujiangnan comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT huangrongdong comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT xiefangqin comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT lijunrong comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT zhengkuicheng comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy AT zhangdongjuan comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy |