Cargando…

Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study

A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Zhi-Qiang, Wu, Jiang-Nan, Huang, Rong-Dong, Xie, Fang-Qin, Li, Jun-Rong, Zheng, Kui-Cheng, Zhang, Dong-Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622
_version_ 1784690728946892800
author Lin, Zhi-Qiang
Wu, Jiang-Nan
Huang, Rong-Dong
Xie, Fang-Qin
Li, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Kui-Cheng
Zhang, Dong-Juan
author_facet Lin, Zhi-Qiang
Wu, Jiang-Nan
Huang, Rong-Dong
Xie, Fang-Qin
Li, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Kui-Cheng
Zhang, Dong-Juan
author_sort Lin, Zhi-Qiang
collection PubMed
description A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour common vaccines in China. In total, 320 eligible participants who had received two doses of an inactivated vaccine were equally allocated to receive a booster of the same vaccine (Group A), a different inactivated vaccine (Group B), an adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccine (Group C), or a protein subunit vaccine (Group D). A higher risk of adverse reactions, observed up to 28 days after injection, was found in Groups C and D, compared to Group A, with odds ratios (OR) of 11.63 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.22–32.05) and 4.38 (1.53–12.56), respectively. Recipients in Group C were more likely to report ≥two reactions (OR = 29.18, 95% CI: 3.70–229.82), and had a higher risk of injection site pain, dizziness, and fatigue. A gender and age disparity in the risk of adverse reactions was identified. Despite the majority of reactions being mild, heterologous booster strategies do increase the risk of adverse reactions, relative to homologous boosters, in subjects who have had two doses of inactive vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9024909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90249092022-04-23 Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study Lin, Zhi-Qiang Wu, Jiang-Nan Huang, Rong-Dong Xie, Fang-Qin Li, Jun-Rong Zheng, Kui-Cheng Zhang, Dong-Juan Vaccines (Basel) Article A vaccine booster to maintain high antibody levels and provide effective protection against COVID-19 has been recommended. However, little is known about the safety of a booster for different vaccines. We conducted a parallel controlled prospective study to compare the safety of a booster usingfour common vaccines in China. In total, 320 eligible participants who had received two doses of an inactivated vaccine were equally allocated to receive a booster of the same vaccine (Group A), a different inactivated vaccine (Group B), an adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccine (Group C), or a protein subunit vaccine (Group D). A higher risk of adverse reactions, observed up to 28 days after injection, was found in Groups C and D, compared to Group A, with odds ratios (OR) of 11.63 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.22–32.05) and 4.38 (1.53–12.56), respectively. Recipients in Group C were more likely to report ≥two reactions (OR = 29.18, 95% CI: 3.70–229.82), and had a higher risk of injection site pain, dizziness, and fatigue. A gender and age disparity in the risk of adverse reactions was identified. Despite the majority of reactions being mild, heterologous booster strategies do increase the risk of adverse reactions, relative to homologous boosters, in subjects who have had two doses of inactive vaccine. MDPI 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9024909/ /pubmed/35455370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Zhi-Qiang
Wu, Jiang-Nan
Huang, Rong-Dong
Xie, Fang-Qin
Li, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Kui-Cheng
Zhang, Dong-Juan
Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title_full Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title_short Comparison of Safety of Different Vaccine Boosters Following Two-Dose Inactivated Vaccines: A Parallel Controlled Prospective Study
title_sort comparison of safety of different vaccine boosters following two-dose inactivated vaccines: a parallel controlled prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9024909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040622
work_keys_str_mv AT linzhiqiang comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT wujiangnan comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT huangrongdong comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT xiefangqin comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT lijunrong comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT zhengkuicheng comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy
AT zhangdongjuan comparisonofsafetyofdifferentvaccineboostersfollowingtwodoseinactivatedvaccinesaparallelcontrolledprospectivestudy