Cargando…

An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom

Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maschio, Michael, Kohli, Michele A., Ashraf, Mansoor, Drummond, Michael F., Weinstein, Milton C., Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599
_version_ 1784690821281349632
author Maschio, Michael
Kohli, Michele A.
Ashraf, Mansoor
Drummond, Michael F.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F.
author_facet Maschio, Michael
Kohli, Michele A.
Ashraf, Mansoor
Drummond, Michael F.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F.
author_sort Maschio, Michael
collection PubMed
description Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group using a range of assumptions about relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Methods: A dynamic transmission model, calibrated to match infection data from the UK, was used to estimate the clinical and economic impact of vaccination across 10 influenza seasons. The list price was £12.50 for QIVc and £22.00 for QIVr. The base case effectiveness of QIVc was 63.9%. As there are no data comparing the vaccines in the 18 to 64-year-old age group, rVE was varied. Results: For the base case, the rVE of QIVr compared with QIVc must be at least 25% in order for the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained to be £20,000 or lower. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the rVE required for QIVr to be cost-effective was most dependent on the absolute effectiveness of QIVc. Conclusion: At list prices, our analysis predicts that the rVE for QIVr must be at least 25% compared to QIVc in order to be considered cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9025244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90252442022-04-23 An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom Maschio, Michael Kohli, Michele A. Ashraf, Mansoor Drummond, Michael F. Weinstein, Milton C. Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F. Vaccines (Basel) Brief Report Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group using a range of assumptions about relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Methods: A dynamic transmission model, calibrated to match infection data from the UK, was used to estimate the clinical and economic impact of vaccination across 10 influenza seasons. The list price was £12.50 for QIVc and £22.00 for QIVr. The base case effectiveness of QIVc was 63.9%. As there are no data comparing the vaccines in the 18 to 64-year-old age group, rVE was varied. Results: For the base case, the rVE of QIVr compared with QIVc must be at least 25% in order for the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained to be £20,000 or lower. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the rVE required for QIVr to be cost-effective was most dependent on the absolute effectiveness of QIVc. Conclusion: At list prices, our analysis predicts that the rVE for QIVr must be at least 25% compared to QIVc in order to be considered cost-effective. MDPI 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9025244/ /pubmed/35455348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Maschio, Michael
Kohli, Michele A.
Ashraf, Mansoor
Drummond, Michael F.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F.
An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title_full An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title_short An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
title_sort economic comparison of influenza vaccines recommended for use in eligible adults under 65 years in the united kingdom
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599
work_keys_str_mv AT maschiomichael aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT kohlimichelea aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT ashrafmansoor aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT drummondmichaelf aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT weinsteinmiltonc aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT mouldquevedojoaquinf aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT maschiomichael economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT kohlimichelea economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT ashrafmansoor economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT drummondmichaelf economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT weinsteinmiltonc economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom
AT mouldquevedojoaquinf economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom