Cargando…
An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom
Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599 |
_version_ | 1784690821281349632 |
---|---|
author | Maschio, Michael Kohli, Michele A. Ashraf, Mansoor Drummond, Michael F. Weinstein, Milton C. Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F. |
author_facet | Maschio, Michael Kohli, Michele A. Ashraf, Mansoor Drummond, Michael F. Weinstein, Milton C. Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F. |
author_sort | Maschio, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group using a range of assumptions about relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Methods: A dynamic transmission model, calibrated to match infection data from the UK, was used to estimate the clinical and economic impact of vaccination across 10 influenza seasons. The list price was £12.50 for QIVc and £22.00 for QIVr. The base case effectiveness of QIVc was 63.9%. As there are no data comparing the vaccines in the 18 to 64-year-old age group, rVE was varied. Results: For the base case, the rVE of QIVr compared with QIVc must be at least 25% in order for the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained to be £20,000 or lower. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the rVE required for QIVr to be cost-effective was most dependent on the absolute effectiveness of QIVc. Conclusion: At list prices, our analysis predicts that the rVE for QIVr must be at least 25% compared to QIVc in order to be considered cost-effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9025244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90252442022-04-23 An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom Maschio, Michael Kohli, Michele A. Ashraf, Mansoor Drummond, Michael F. Weinstein, Milton C. Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F. Vaccines (Basel) Brief Report Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) and a recombinant vaccine (QIVr) are recommended for eligible adults under 65 years. The objective of this analysis was to determine the potential cost-effectiveness of QIVc compared to QIVr for this age group using a range of assumptions about relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Methods: A dynamic transmission model, calibrated to match infection data from the UK, was used to estimate the clinical and economic impact of vaccination across 10 influenza seasons. The list price was £12.50 for QIVc and £22.00 for QIVr. The base case effectiveness of QIVc was 63.9%. As there are no data comparing the vaccines in the 18 to 64-year-old age group, rVE was varied. Results: For the base case, the rVE of QIVr compared with QIVc must be at least 25% in order for the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained to be £20,000 or lower. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the rVE required for QIVr to be cost-effective was most dependent on the absolute effectiveness of QIVc. Conclusion: At list prices, our analysis predicts that the rVE for QIVr must be at least 25% compared to QIVc in order to be considered cost-effective. MDPI 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9025244/ /pubmed/35455348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Maschio, Michael Kohli, Michele A. Ashraf, Mansoor Drummond, Michael F. Weinstein, Milton C. Mould-Quevedo, Joaquin F. An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title | An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title_full | An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title_short | An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | economic comparison of influenza vaccines recommended for use in eligible adults under 65 years in the united kingdom |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maschiomichael aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT kohlimichelea aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT ashrafmansoor aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT drummondmichaelf aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT weinsteinmiltonc aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT mouldquevedojoaquinf aneconomiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT maschiomichael economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT kohlimichelea economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT ashrafmansoor economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT drummondmichaelf economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT weinsteinmiltonc economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom AT mouldquevedojoaquinf economiccomparisonofinfluenzavaccinesrecommendedforuseineligibleadultsunder65yearsintheunitedkingdom |