Cargando…

Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study

Background: The adequate choice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) could influence the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) in general surgery. A new local PAP guideline was implemented in May 2017 and set the first-generation cefazolin (CFZ) instead the second-generation cefuroxime (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Surat, Güzin, Meyer-Sautter, Pascal, Rüsch, Jan, Braun-Feldweg, Johannes, Markus, Christian Karl, Germer, Christoph-Thomas, Lock, Johan Friso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040501
_version_ 1784690867257212928
author Surat, Güzin
Meyer-Sautter, Pascal
Rüsch, Jan
Braun-Feldweg, Johannes
Markus, Christian Karl
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Lock, Johan Friso
author_facet Surat, Güzin
Meyer-Sautter, Pascal
Rüsch, Jan
Braun-Feldweg, Johannes
Markus, Christian Karl
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Lock, Johan Friso
author_sort Surat, Güzin
collection PubMed
description Background: The adequate choice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) could influence the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) in general surgery. A new local PAP guideline was implemented in May 2017 and set the first-generation cefazolin (CFZ) instead the second-generation cefuroxime (CXM) as the new standard prophylactic antibiotic. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of SSIs after this implementation in intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) without sepsis. Methods: We performed a single center-quality improvement study at a 1500 bed sized university hospital in Germany analyzing patients after emergency surgery during 2016 to 2019 (n = 985), of which patients receiving CXM or CFZ were selected (n = 587). Propensity score matching was performed to ensure a comparable risk of SSIs in both groups. None-inferiority margin for SSIs was defined as 8% vs. 4%. Results: Two matched cohorts with respectively 196 patients were compared. The rate of SSIs was higher in the CFZ group (7.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.117) below the non-inferiority margin. The rate of other postoperative infections was significantly higher in the CFZ group (2.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.004). No other differences including postoperative morbidity, mortality or length-of-stay were observed. Conclusion: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis might be safely maintained by CFZ even in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9025420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90254202022-04-23 Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study Surat, Güzin Meyer-Sautter, Pascal Rüsch, Jan Braun-Feldweg, Johannes Markus, Christian Karl Germer, Christoph-Thomas Lock, Johan Friso Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: The adequate choice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) could influence the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) in general surgery. A new local PAP guideline was implemented in May 2017 and set the first-generation cefazolin (CFZ) instead the second-generation cefuroxime (CXM) as the new standard prophylactic antibiotic. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of SSIs after this implementation in intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) without sepsis. Methods: We performed a single center-quality improvement study at a 1500 bed sized university hospital in Germany analyzing patients after emergency surgery during 2016 to 2019 (n = 985), of which patients receiving CXM or CFZ were selected (n = 587). Propensity score matching was performed to ensure a comparable risk of SSIs in both groups. None-inferiority margin for SSIs was defined as 8% vs. 4%. Results: Two matched cohorts with respectively 196 patients were compared. The rate of SSIs was higher in the CFZ group (7.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.117) below the non-inferiority margin. The rate of other postoperative infections was significantly higher in the CFZ group (2.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.004). No other differences including postoperative morbidity, mortality or length-of-stay were observed. Conclusion: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis might be safely maintained by CFZ even in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. MDPI 2022-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9025420/ /pubmed/35453252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040501 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Surat, Güzin
Meyer-Sautter, Pascal
Rüsch, Jan
Braun-Feldweg, Johannes
Markus, Christian Karl
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Lock, Johan Friso
Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title_full Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title_fullStr Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title_full_unstemmed Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title_short Cefazolin Might Be Adequate for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intra-Abdominal Infections without Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Study
title_sort cefazolin might be adequate for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in intra-abdominal infections without sepsis: a quality improvement study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040501
work_keys_str_mv AT suratguzin cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT meyersautterpascal cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT ruschjan cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT braunfeldwegjohannes cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT markuschristiankarl cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT germerchristophthomas cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy
AT lockjohanfriso cefazolinmightbeadequateforperioperativeantibioticprophylaxisinintraabdominalinfectionswithoutsepsisaqualityimprovementstudy