Cargando…

Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review

Precision medicine (PM), specifically genetic-based testing, is currently used in over 140,000 individual tests to inform the clinical management of disease. Though several databases (e.g., the NIH Genetic Testing Registry) demonstrate the availability of these sequencing-based tests, we do not curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douglas, Michael P., Kumar, Anika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040557
_version_ 1784690907979710464
author Douglas, Michael P.
Kumar, Anika
author_facet Douglas, Michael P.
Kumar, Anika
author_sort Douglas, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description Precision medicine (PM), specifically genetic-based testing, is currently used in over 140,000 individual tests to inform the clinical management of disease. Though several databases (e.g., the NIH Genetic Testing Registry) demonstrate the availability of these sequencing-based tests, we do not currently understand the extent to which these tests are used. There exists a need to synthesize the body of real-world data (RWD) describing the use of sequencing-based tests to inform their appropriate use. To accomplish this, we performed a scoping review to examine what RWD sources have been used in studies of PM utilization between January 2015 and August 2021 to characterize the use of genome sequencing (GS), exome sequencing (ES), tumor sequencing (TS), next-generation sequencing-based panels (NGS), gene expression profiling (GEP), and pharmacogenomics (PGx) panels. We abstracted variables describing the use of these types of tests and performed a descriptive statistical analysis. We identified 440 articles in our search and included 72 articles in our study. Publications based on registry databases were the most common, followed by studies based on private insurer administrative claims. Slightly more than one-third (38%) used integrated datasets. Two thirds (67%) of the studies focused on the use of tests for oncological clinical applications. We summarize the RWD sources used in peer-reviewed literature on the use of PM. Our findings will help improve future study design by encouraging the use of centralized databases and registries to track the implementation and use of PM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9025578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90255782022-04-23 Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review Douglas, Michael P. Kumar, Anika J Pers Med Review Precision medicine (PM), specifically genetic-based testing, is currently used in over 140,000 individual tests to inform the clinical management of disease. Though several databases (e.g., the NIH Genetic Testing Registry) demonstrate the availability of these sequencing-based tests, we do not currently understand the extent to which these tests are used. There exists a need to synthesize the body of real-world data (RWD) describing the use of sequencing-based tests to inform their appropriate use. To accomplish this, we performed a scoping review to examine what RWD sources have been used in studies of PM utilization between January 2015 and August 2021 to characterize the use of genome sequencing (GS), exome sequencing (ES), tumor sequencing (TS), next-generation sequencing-based panels (NGS), gene expression profiling (GEP), and pharmacogenomics (PGx) panels. We abstracted variables describing the use of these types of tests and performed a descriptive statistical analysis. We identified 440 articles in our search and included 72 articles in our study. Publications based on registry databases were the most common, followed by studies based on private insurer administrative claims. Slightly more than one-third (38%) used integrated datasets. Two thirds (67%) of the studies focused on the use of tests for oncological clinical applications. We summarize the RWD sources used in peer-reviewed literature on the use of PM. Our findings will help improve future study design by encouraging the use of centralized databases and registries to track the implementation and use of PM. MDPI 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9025578/ /pubmed/35455673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040557 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Douglas, Michael P.
Kumar, Anika
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title_full Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title_short Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review
title_sort analyzing precision medicine utilization with real-world data: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35455673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040557
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasmichaelp analyzingprecisionmedicineutilizationwithrealworlddataascopingreview
AT kumaranika analyzingprecisionmedicineutilizationwithrealworlddataascopingreview