Cargando…
Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning
Research based on traditional linear techniques has yet not been able to clearly identify the role of cognitive skills in reading problems, presumably because the process of reading and the factors that are associated with reading reside within a system of multiple interacting and moderating factors...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869352 |
_version_ | 1784690910643093504 |
---|---|
author | Walda, Sietske Hasselman, Fred Bosman, Anna |
author_facet | Walda, Sietske Hasselman, Fred Bosman, Anna |
author_sort | Walda, Sietske |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research based on traditional linear techniques has yet not been able to clearly identify the role of cognitive skills in reading problems, presumably because the process of reading and the factors that are associated with reading reside within a system of multiple interacting and moderating factors that cannot be captured within traditional statistical models. If cognitive skills are indeed indicative of reading problems, the relatively new nonlinear techniques of machine learning should make better predictions. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether cognitive factors play any role in reading skill, questioning (1) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of present reading level, and (2) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of future reading progress. In three studies with varying groups of participants (average school-aged and poor readers), the results of four supervised machine learning techniques were compared to the traditional General Linear Models technique. Results of all models appeared to be comparable, producing poor to acceptable results, which are however inadequate for making a thorough prediction of reading development. Assumably, cognitive skills are not predictive of reading problems, although they do correlate with one another. This insight has consequences for scientific theories of reading development, as well as for the prevention and remediation of reading difficulties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9025592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90255922022-04-23 Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning Walda, Sietske Hasselman, Fred Bosman, Anna Front Psychol Psychology Research based on traditional linear techniques has yet not been able to clearly identify the role of cognitive skills in reading problems, presumably because the process of reading and the factors that are associated with reading reside within a system of multiple interacting and moderating factors that cannot be captured within traditional statistical models. If cognitive skills are indeed indicative of reading problems, the relatively new nonlinear techniques of machine learning should make better predictions. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether cognitive factors play any role in reading skill, questioning (1) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of present reading level, and (2) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of future reading progress. In three studies with varying groups of participants (average school-aged and poor readers), the results of four supervised machine learning techniques were compared to the traditional General Linear Models technique. Results of all models appeared to be comparable, producing poor to acceptable results, which are however inadequate for making a thorough prediction of reading development. Assumably, cognitive skills are not predictive of reading problems, although they do correlate with one another. This insight has consequences for scientific theories of reading development, as well as for the prevention and remediation of reading difficulties. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9025592/ /pubmed/35465492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869352 Text en Copyright © 2022 Walda, Hasselman and Bosman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Walda, Sietske Hasselman, Fred Bosman, Anna Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title | Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | identifying determinants of dyslexia: an ultimate attempt using machine learning |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waldasietske identifyingdeterminantsofdyslexiaanultimateattemptusingmachinelearning AT hasselmanfred identifyingdeterminantsofdyslexiaanultimateattemptusingmachinelearning AT bosmananna identifyingdeterminantsofdyslexiaanultimateattemptusingmachinelearning |