Cargando…
Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis Does Not Influence the Malignancy Risk in Nodules of Category III in the Bethesda System
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Thyroid nodules in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) have a high prevalence of equivocal cytology, especially category III of the Bethesda system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules in patients with and without...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081971 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Thyroid nodules in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) have a high prevalence of equivocal cytology, especially category III of the Bethesda system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules in patients with and without HT, and to analyze whether obtaining category III with a repeat FNA increases RoM. We found that RoM in category III nodules was not affected by the presence of HT. In patients with nodules that show nuclear atypia, irrespective of the presence of HT, there are stronger indications for surgical treatment than in patients with nodules presenting architectural atypia. The chances of obtaining category III once again, with repeat FNA, are higher in patients with HT than without it. If the repeated diagnosis of category III results again from the architectural atypia, without signs of nuclear atypia, then the risk of malignancy does not increase. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules of the Bethesda system in patients with and without Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) and to analyze whether obtaining category III with a repeat FNA (rFNA) increases RoM. The study included 563 HT and 1250 non-HT patients; rFNA was performed in 349 and 575 patients, and surgical treatment in 160 and 390, respectively. There was no difference in RoM between HT and non-HT patients in the whole examined population (lower limit of RoM), nor in operated patients (upper limit of RoM), HT: 5.0–17.5%, non-HT: 4.7–15.1%. RoM in patients with AUS nodules (with nuclear atypia) was similar in both groups (HT: 21.7–40.0%, non-HT: 16.9–41.4%), as it was in patients with FLUS nodules (with architectural atypia) (HT: 3.5–13.3%, non-HT: 4.0–13.0%). In patients from both groups together, with category III diagnosed twice and AUS identified at least once, RoM was 16.7–50.0% and it was higher than that in patients with FLUS nodule diagnosed twice: 3.2–13.0% (p < 0.005). Concluding, RoM in category III nodules is not affected by the presence of HT. Subcategorization of category III nodules (FLUS vs. AUS) may provide guidance toward further follow-up or surgery in both groups. |
---|