Cargando…

A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent

Anionic surfactants (AS) are becoming a major emerging contaminant of waters due to their widespread use in household and industrial products. The standard chloroform method for analysis of AS in water relies on chloroform extraction of a methylene blue active substance (MBAS), which contains ion pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Jung-Hwan, Shin, Yong-Geon, Kirkham, Mary Beth, Jeong, Seok-Soon, Lee, Jong-Geon, Kim, Hyuck-Soo, Yang, Jae E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040162
_version_ 1784690958197063680
author Yoon, Jung-Hwan
Shin, Yong-Geon
Kirkham, Mary Beth
Jeong, Seok-Soon
Lee, Jong-Geon
Kim, Hyuck-Soo
Yang, Jae E.
author_facet Yoon, Jung-Hwan
Shin, Yong-Geon
Kirkham, Mary Beth
Jeong, Seok-Soon
Lee, Jong-Geon
Kim, Hyuck-Soo
Yang, Jae E.
author_sort Yoon, Jung-Hwan
collection PubMed
description Anionic surfactants (AS) are becoming a major emerging contaminant of waters due to their widespread use in household and industrial products. The standard chloroform method for analysis of AS in water relies on chloroform extraction of a methylene blue active substance (MBAS), which contains ion pairs between methylene blue (MB) molecules (positively charged) and AS. Due to the poor extractability of chloroform, the procedure is complicated, time-consuming, and subject to anionic interferences. A mixture of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)–1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) at a 3:1 ratio of MIBK:DCE proved to be a robust solvent for AS extraction for a wide range of samples under various chemical conditions. The objectives of this research were to set the washing protocol to eliminate the anionic interferences in the MIBK-DCE extraction and to develop a new simplified analytical method for AS analysis using the MIBK-DCE (3:1) extractant. The suitability of the proposed MIBK-DCE method was validated based on quality control and assurance criteria, such as selectivity, accuracy, precision, method detection limit (MDL), limit of quantification (LOQ), and sensitivity. Various water samples, such as freshwater, wastewater, and seawater, were used for the method development and validation. Interferences by inorganic and organic anions were evident in the reference chloroform method but were eliminated in the MIBK-DCE procedure with a two-step process that consisted of washing with a carbonate/bicarbonate solution at pH 9.2 and a mixture of silver sulfate (Ag(2)SO(4)) and potassium alum (AlK(SO(4))(2)). The simplified MIBK-DCE method for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) analysis consisted of (i) sample pre-treatment, (ii) MIBK-DCE extraction, (iii) washing and filtration, and (iv) absorbance measurement. The MIBK-DCE method was accurate, precise, selective, and sensitive for AS analysis and showed MDL of 0.0001 mg/L, LOQ of 0.0005 mg/L, relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.1%, and recovery of 99.0%. All these criteria were superior to those of the chloroform method. Sensitivity analysis showed highly significant correlations in AS analyses between the MIBK-DCE and chloroform methods for domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and seawater. The MIBK-DCE method is simple, rapid, robust, reproducible, and convenient, when compared to the chloroform method. Results demonstrate that the simplified MIBK-DCE method can be employed for AS analysis in a wide range of environmental waters including seawater.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9025779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90257792022-04-23 A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent Yoon, Jung-Hwan Shin, Yong-Geon Kirkham, Mary Beth Jeong, Seok-Soon Lee, Jong-Geon Kim, Hyuck-Soo Yang, Jae E. Toxics Article Anionic surfactants (AS) are becoming a major emerging contaminant of waters due to their widespread use in household and industrial products. The standard chloroform method for analysis of AS in water relies on chloroform extraction of a methylene blue active substance (MBAS), which contains ion pairs between methylene blue (MB) molecules (positively charged) and AS. Due to the poor extractability of chloroform, the procedure is complicated, time-consuming, and subject to anionic interferences. A mixture of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)–1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) at a 3:1 ratio of MIBK:DCE proved to be a robust solvent for AS extraction for a wide range of samples under various chemical conditions. The objectives of this research were to set the washing protocol to eliminate the anionic interferences in the MIBK-DCE extraction and to develop a new simplified analytical method for AS analysis using the MIBK-DCE (3:1) extractant. The suitability of the proposed MIBK-DCE method was validated based on quality control and assurance criteria, such as selectivity, accuracy, precision, method detection limit (MDL), limit of quantification (LOQ), and sensitivity. Various water samples, such as freshwater, wastewater, and seawater, were used for the method development and validation. Interferences by inorganic and organic anions were evident in the reference chloroform method but were eliminated in the MIBK-DCE procedure with a two-step process that consisted of washing with a carbonate/bicarbonate solution at pH 9.2 and a mixture of silver sulfate (Ag(2)SO(4)) and potassium alum (AlK(SO(4))(2)). The simplified MIBK-DCE method for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) analysis consisted of (i) sample pre-treatment, (ii) MIBK-DCE extraction, (iii) washing and filtration, and (iv) absorbance measurement. The MIBK-DCE method was accurate, precise, selective, and sensitive for AS analysis and showed MDL of 0.0001 mg/L, LOQ of 0.0005 mg/L, relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.1%, and recovery of 99.0%. All these criteria were superior to those of the chloroform method. Sensitivity analysis showed highly significant correlations in AS analyses between the MIBK-DCE and chloroform methods for domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and seawater. The MIBK-DCE method is simple, rapid, robust, reproducible, and convenient, when compared to the chloroform method. Results demonstrate that the simplified MIBK-DCE method can be employed for AS analysis in a wide range of environmental waters including seawater. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9025779/ /pubmed/35448423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040162 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yoon, Jung-Hwan
Shin, Yong-Geon
Kirkham, Mary Beth
Jeong, Seok-Soon
Lee, Jong-Geon
Kim, Hyuck-Soo
Yang, Jae E.
A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title_full A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title_fullStr A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title_full_unstemmed A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title_short A Simplified Method for Anionic Surfactant Analysis in Water Using a New Solvent
title_sort simplified method for anionic surfactant analysis in water using a new solvent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040162
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonjunghwan asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT shinyonggeon asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT kirkhammarybeth asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT jeongseoksoon asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT leejonggeon asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT kimhyucksoo asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT yangjaee asimplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT yoonjunghwan simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT shinyonggeon simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT kirkhammarybeth simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT jeongseoksoon simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT leejonggeon simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT kimhyucksoo simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent
AT yangjaee simplifiedmethodforanionicsurfactantanalysisinwaterusinganewsolvent