Cargando…
Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty
The fundamental objective of earthquake engineering is to protect lives and livelihoods through the reduction of seismic risk. Directly or indirectly, this generally requires quantification of the risk, for which quantification of the seismic hazard is required as a basic input. Over the last severa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4 |
_version_ | 1784691033130401792 |
---|---|
author | Bommer, Julian J. |
author_facet | Bommer, Julian J. |
author_sort | Bommer, Julian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fundamental objective of earthquake engineering is to protect lives and livelihoods through the reduction of seismic risk. Directly or indirectly, this generally requires quantification of the risk, for which quantification of the seismic hazard is required as a basic input. Over the last several decades, the practice of seismic hazard analysis has evolved enormously, firstly with the introduction of a rational framework for handling the apparent randomness in earthquake processes, which also enabled risk assessments to consider both the severity and likelihood of earthquake effects. The next major evolutionary step was the identification of epistemic uncertainties related to incomplete knowledge, and the formulation of frameworks for both their quantification and their incorporation into hazard assessments. Despite these advances in the practice of seismic hazard analysis, it is not uncommon for the acceptance of seismic hazard estimates to be hindered by invalid comparisons, resistance to new information that challenges prevailing views, and attachment to previous estimates of the hazard. The challenge of achieving impartial acceptance of seismic hazard and risk estimates becomes even more acute in the case of earthquakes attributed to human activities. A more rational evaluation of seismic hazard and risk due to induced earthquakes may be facilitated by adopting, with appropriate adaptations, the advances in risk quantification and risk mitigation developed for natural seismicity. While such practices may provide an impartial starting point for decision making regarding risk mitigation measures, the most promising avenue to achieve broad societal acceptance of the risks associated with induced earthquakes is through effective regulation, which needs to be transparent, independent, and informed by risk considerations based on both sound seismological science and reliable earthquake engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9026070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90260702022-04-22 Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty Bommer, Julian J. Bull Earthq Eng Original Article The fundamental objective of earthquake engineering is to protect lives and livelihoods through the reduction of seismic risk. Directly or indirectly, this generally requires quantification of the risk, for which quantification of the seismic hazard is required as a basic input. Over the last several decades, the practice of seismic hazard analysis has evolved enormously, firstly with the introduction of a rational framework for handling the apparent randomness in earthquake processes, which also enabled risk assessments to consider both the severity and likelihood of earthquake effects. The next major evolutionary step was the identification of epistemic uncertainties related to incomplete knowledge, and the formulation of frameworks for both their quantification and their incorporation into hazard assessments. Despite these advances in the practice of seismic hazard analysis, it is not uncommon for the acceptance of seismic hazard estimates to be hindered by invalid comparisons, resistance to new information that challenges prevailing views, and attachment to previous estimates of the hazard. The challenge of achieving impartial acceptance of seismic hazard and risk estimates becomes even more acute in the case of earthquakes attributed to human activities. A more rational evaluation of seismic hazard and risk due to induced earthquakes may be facilitated by adopting, with appropriate adaptations, the advances in risk quantification and risk mitigation developed for natural seismicity. While such practices may provide an impartial starting point for decision making regarding risk mitigation measures, the most promising avenue to achieve broad societal acceptance of the risks associated with induced earthquakes is through effective regulation, which needs to be transparent, independent, and informed by risk considerations based on both sound seismological science and reliable earthquake engineering. Springer Netherlands 2022-04-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9026070/ /pubmed/35474945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bommer, Julian J. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title | Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title_full | Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title_fullStr | Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed | Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title_short | Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
title_sort | earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bommerjulianj earthquakehazardandriskanalysisfornaturalandinducedseismicitytowardsobjectiveassessmentsinthefaceofuncertainty |