Cargando…

Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial recovery allows for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explantations after long-term support. Several surgical approaches, including interventional decommissioning, off-pump explantation using a custom-made plug and complete LVAD removal through redo sternotomy, have been d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potapov, Evgenij V, Politis, Nikolaos, Karck, Matthias, Weyand, Michael, Tandler, René, Walther, Thomas, Emrich, Fabian, Reichenspurrner, Hermann, Bernhardt, Alexander, Barten, Markus J, Svenarud, Peter, Gummert, Jan, Sef, Davorin, Doenst, Torsten, Tsyganenko, Dmytro, Loforte, Antonio, Schoenrath, Felix, Falk, Volkmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34888681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab344
_version_ 1784691069756112896
author Potapov, Evgenij V
Politis, Nikolaos
Karck, Matthias
Weyand, Michael
Tandler, René
Walther, Thomas
Emrich, Fabian
Reichenspurrner, Hermann
Bernhardt, Alexander
Barten, Markus J
Svenarud, Peter
Gummert, Jan
Sef, Davorin
Doenst, Torsten
Tsyganenko, Dmytro
Loforte, Antonio
Schoenrath, Felix
Falk, Volkmar
author_facet Potapov, Evgenij V
Politis, Nikolaos
Karck, Matthias
Weyand, Michael
Tandler, René
Walther, Thomas
Emrich, Fabian
Reichenspurrner, Hermann
Bernhardt, Alexander
Barten, Markus J
Svenarud, Peter
Gummert, Jan
Sef, Davorin
Doenst, Torsten
Tsyganenko, Dmytro
Loforte, Antonio
Schoenrath, Felix
Falk, Volkmar
author_sort Potapov, Evgenij V
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Myocardial recovery allows for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explantations after long-term support. Several surgical approaches, including interventional decommissioning, off-pump explantation using a custom-made plug and complete LVAD removal through redo sternotomy, have been described. We present the results from an evaluation of the long-term follow-up of patients who received a titanium sintered plug after LVAD explantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, European, multicentre analysis of patients who received a titanium sintered plug to seal the apical fixation ring after LVAD explantation. Data were collected from a questionnaire that included demographics, procedural details and follow-up information. RESULTS: Out of 54 contacted centres in 12 countries (n = 179 patients), a total of 68 patients were successfully included in the study. The median follow-up was 34 months (interquartile range: 17–58.5 months); 57 (84%) patients had >1-year follow-up. At the time of the last follow-up, 55 (81%) patients were alive, with a Kaplan–Meier 1-year survival of 90.1% (95% confidence interval: 84.0–98.1%) and a 5-year survival of 80.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.4–92.9%). One patient (1.5%) developed a plug infection originating from an infected part of the incorporated driveline and, after complete removal, is currently in good condition. No postoperative stroke has been reported after plug implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this European multicentre study, the use of a custom-made titanium plug to close the apical fixation ring after LVAD explantation resulted in a low incidence of plug-related complications. With the volume of patients undergoing LVAD explantations after myocardial recovery increasing, the plug has evolved as a simple alternative to more invasive device explantation procedures or decommissioning with a high risk for infection of the remaining system or stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9026212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90262122022-04-25 Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation Potapov, Evgenij V Politis, Nikolaos Karck, Matthias Weyand, Michael Tandler, René Walther, Thomas Emrich, Fabian Reichenspurrner, Hermann Bernhardt, Alexander Barten, Markus J Svenarud, Peter Gummert, Jan Sef, Davorin Doenst, Torsten Tsyganenko, Dmytro Loforte, Antonio Schoenrath, Felix Falk, Volkmar Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Mechanical Circulatory Support OBJECTIVES: Myocardial recovery allows for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explantations after long-term support. Several surgical approaches, including interventional decommissioning, off-pump explantation using a custom-made plug and complete LVAD removal through redo sternotomy, have been described. We present the results from an evaluation of the long-term follow-up of patients who received a titanium sintered plug after LVAD explantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, European, multicentre analysis of patients who received a titanium sintered plug to seal the apical fixation ring after LVAD explantation. Data were collected from a questionnaire that included demographics, procedural details and follow-up information. RESULTS: Out of 54 contacted centres in 12 countries (n = 179 patients), a total of 68 patients were successfully included in the study. The median follow-up was 34 months (interquartile range: 17–58.5 months); 57 (84%) patients had >1-year follow-up. At the time of the last follow-up, 55 (81%) patients were alive, with a Kaplan–Meier 1-year survival of 90.1% (95% confidence interval: 84.0–98.1%) and a 5-year survival of 80.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.4–92.9%). One patient (1.5%) developed a plug infection originating from an infected part of the incorporated driveline and, after complete removal, is currently in good condition. No postoperative stroke has been reported after plug implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this European multicentre study, the use of a custom-made titanium plug to close the apical fixation ring after LVAD explantation resulted in a low incidence of plug-related complications. With the volume of patients undergoing LVAD explantations after myocardial recovery increasing, the plug has evolved as a simple alternative to more invasive device explantation procedures or decommissioning with a high risk for infection of the remaining system or stroke. Oxford University Press 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9026212/ /pubmed/34888681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab344 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mechanical Circulatory Support
Potapov, Evgenij V
Politis, Nikolaos
Karck, Matthias
Weyand, Michael
Tandler, René
Walther, Thomas
Emrich, Fabian
Reichenspurrner, Hermann
Bernhardt, Alexander
Barten, Markus J
Svenarud, Peter
Gummert, Jan
Sef, Davorin
Doenst, Torsten
Tsyganenko, Dmytro
Loforte, Antonio
Schoenrath, Felix
Falk, Volkmar
Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title_full Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title_fullStr Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title_full_unstemmed Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title_short Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
title_sort results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation
topic Mechanical Circulatory Support
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34888681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab344
work_keys_str_mv AT potapovevgenijv resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT politisnikolaos resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT karckmatthias resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT weyandmichael resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT tandlerrene resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT waltherthomas resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT emrichfabian resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT reichenspurrnerhermann resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT bernhardtalexander resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT bartenmarkusj resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT svenarudpeter resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT gummertjan resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT sefdavorin resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT doensttorsten resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT tsyganenkodmytro resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT loforteantonio resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT schoenrathfelix resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation
AT falkvolkmar resultsfromamulticentreevaluationofpluguseforleftventricularassistdeviceexplantation