Cargando…

Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia

PURPOSE: To present a case of a 62-year-old patient implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) who underwent a bilateral IOL exchange due to positive dysphotopsia. In an attempt to reduce the symptoms and compensate for the loss of multifocality, we implanted an aspheric monofocal IOL with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naujokaitis, Tadas, Zhao, Ling, Scharf, Debora, Khoramnia, Ramin, Auffarth, Gerd U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101511
_version_ 1784691159280386048
author Naujokaitis, Tadas
Zhao, Ling
Scharf, Debora
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_facet Naujokaitis, Tadas
Zhao, Ling
Scharf, Debora
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_sort Naujokaitis, Tadas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To present a case of a 62-year-old patient implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) who underwent a bilateral IOL exchange due to positive dysphotopsia. In an attempt to reduce the symptoms and compensate for the loss of multifocality, we implanted an aspheric monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in one eye and a spherical monofocal IOL in the other eye. OBSERVATIONS: The patient presented with complaints of halo and glare, measured with a simulator, following the implantation of segmented multifocal IOLs two years earlier. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Before presentation at our clinic, a laser capsulotomy had been performed on the right eye. We proceeded with a bilateral IOL exchange. Because of capsular insufficiency in the right eye, we implanted a spherical monofocal three-piece IOL in the ciliary sulcus with optic capture. In the left eye, we used a monofocal IOL with an enhanced intermediate function. Two weeks postoperatively, UDVA (monocularly) was 20/20 in OD and OS, the uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) was 20/32, and the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 20/50. Binocularly, UDVA was 20/20, UIVA was 20/25 and UNVA was 20/25. The patient reported a marked decrease in halos and glare. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: When planning IOL exchange surgery, in cases of intolerance to multifocal IOLs, the clinician should consider the dilemma of loss of multifocality. Recent developments in monofocal IOL technology present new options to improve visual function in cases of multifocal IOL explantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9026612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90266122022-04-23 Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia Naujokaitis, Tadas Zhao, Ling Scharf, Debora Khoramnia, Ramin Auffarth, Gerd U. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Case Report PURPOSE: To present a case of a 62-year-old patient implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) who underwent a bilateral IOL exchange due to positive dysphotopsia. In an attempt to reduce the symptoms and compensate for the loss of multifocality, we implanted an aspheric monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in one eye and a spherical monofocal IOL in the other eye. OBSERVATIONS: The patient presented with complaints of halo and glare, measured with a simulator, following the implantation of segmented multifocal IOLs two years earlier. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Before presentation at our clinic, a laser capsulotomy had been performed on the right eye. We proceeded with a bilateral IOL exchange. Because of capsular insufficiency in the right eye, we implanted a spherical monofocal three-piece IOL in the ciliary sulcus with optic capture. In the left eye, we used a monofocal IOL with an enhanced intermediate function. Two weeks postoperatively, UDVA (monocularly) was 20/20 in OD and OS, the uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) was 20/32, and the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 20/50. Binocularly, UDVA was 20/20, UIVA was 20/25 and UNVA was 20/25. The patient reported a marked decrease in halos and glare. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: When planning IOL exchange surgery, in cases of intolerance to multifocal IOLs, the clinician should consider the dilemma of loss of multifocality. Recent developments in monofocal IOL technology present new options to improve visual function in cases of multifocal IOL explantation. Elsevier 2022-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9026612/ /pubmed/35464676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101511 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Naujokaitis, Tadas
Zhao, Ling
Scharf, Debora
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title_full Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title_fullStr Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title_full_unstemmed Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title_short Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
title_sort monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101511
work_keys_str_mv AT naujokaitistadas monofocalintraocularlenswithenhancedintermediatefunctionassubstituteformultifocalintraocularlensinpositivedysphotopsia
AT zhaoling monofocalintraocularlenswithenhancedintermediatefunctionassubstituteformultifocalintraocularlensinpositivedysphotopsia
AT scharfdebora monofocalintraocularlenswithenhancedintermediatefunctionassubstituteformultifocalintraocularlensinpositivedysphotopsia
AT khoramniaramin monofocalintraocularlenswithenhancedintermediatefunctionassubstituteformultifocalintraocularlensinpositivedysphotopsia
AT auffarthgerdu monofocalintraocularlenswithenhancedintermediatefunctionassubstituteformultifocalintraocularlensinpositivedysphotopsia