Cargando…
Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Patients and the public have an integral role in educating healthcare professionals. Authentic partnerships between higher education institutions and patients and the public are essential. This study examined key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public inv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z |
_version_ | 1784691245017202688 |
---|---|
author | Cullen, Megan Cadogan, Cathal George, Susmi Murphy, Siobhan Freeney, Siobhan Fitzpatrick, Robbie Strawbridge, Judith |
author_facet | Cullen, Megan Cadogan, Cathal George, Susmi Murphy, Siobhan Freeney, Siobhan Fitzpatrick, Robbie Strawbridge, Judith |
author_sort | Cullen, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients and the public have an integral role in educating healthcare professionals. Authentic partnerships between higher education institutions and patients and the public are essential. This study examined key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement (PPI) including the nature of the involvement and requirements for partnership. METHODS: Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit key stakeholders, including patients and members of the public involved in health professions education, and academics interested in PPI. Focus groups were held with patient and public participants, providing the opportunity to gain multiple perspectives in an interactive group setting. Academics with an interest in PPI were interviewed using a semi-structured approach. Topic guides were derived from the literature and piloted prior to data collection. Focus groups and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. All data was audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Four focus groups were conducted involving 23 patient and public participants (median number of participants per focus group of 6). Nine interviews were conducted with academics (face-to-face [n = 8] or by telephone [n = 1]). Five themes were developed: previous experiences of PPI, training requirements, challenges/barriers to PPI, facilitators of PPI and future ideas for PPI. All participants held positive views of the value of PPI. Participants had mixed views in terms of training, which depended on the level of involvement, but similar views on the challenges and facilitators for PPI in education. There was agreement that PPI requires institutional vision and investment to build strong relationships and a culture of PPI best practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more strategic and formal involvement of patients and the public to ensure that that PPI becomes sustainably embedded in health professions education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9026974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90269742022-04-23 Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study Cullen, Megan Cadogan, Cathal George, Susmi Murphy, Siobhan Freeney, Siobhan Fitzpatrick, Robbie Strawbridge, Judith BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Patients and the public have an integral role in educating healthcare professionals. Authentic partnerships between higher education institutions and patients and the public are essential. This study examined key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement (PPI) including the nature of the involvement and requirements for partnership. METHODS: Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit key stakeholders, including patients and members of the public involved in health professions education, and academics interested in PPI. Focus groups were held with patient and public participants, providing the opportunity to gain multiple perspectives in an interactive group setting. Academics with an interest in PPI were interviewed using a semi-structured approach. Topic guides were derived from the literature and piloted prior to data collection. Focus groups and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. All data was audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Four focus groups were conducted involving 23 patient and public participants (median number of participants per focus group of 6). Nine interviews were conducted with academics (face-to-face [n = 8] or by telephone [n = 1]). Five themes were developed: previous experiences of PPI, training requirements, challenges/barriers to PPI, facilitators of PPI and future ideas for PPI. All participants held positive views of the value of PPI. Participants had mixed views in terms of training, which depended on the level of involvement, but similar views on the challenges and facilitators for PPI in education. There was agreement that PPI requires institutional vision and investment to build strong relationships and a culture of PPI best practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more strategic and formal involvement of patients and the public to ensure that that PPI becomes sustainably embedded in health professions education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z. BioMed Central 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9026974/ /pubmed/35449105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cullen, Megan Cadogan, Cathal George, Susmi Murphy, Siobhan Freeney, Siobhan Fitzpatrick, Robbie Strawbridge, Judith Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title | Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title_full | Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title_short | Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
title_sort | key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions’ education: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cullenmegan keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT cadogancathal keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT georgesusmi keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT murphysiobhan keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT freeneysiobhan keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT fitzpatrickrobbie keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy AT strawbridgejudith keystakeholdersviewsexperiencesandexpectationsofpatientandpublicinvolvementinhealthcareprofessionseducationaqualitativestudy |