Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that may affect any part of the gastrointestinal system. In this scoping review, we attempt to map existing evidence on the role of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in the diagnosis and management of NENs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantelis, Athanasios G., Panagopoulou, Panagiota A., Lapatsanis, Dimitris P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040874
_version_ 1784691332781965312
author Pantelis, Athanasios G.
Panagopoulou, Panagiota A.
Lapatsanis, Dimitris P.
author_facet Pantelis, Athanasios G.
Panagopoulou, Panagiota A.
Lapatsanis, Dimitris P.
author_sort Pantelis, Athanasios G.
collection PubMed
description Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that may affect any part of the gastrointestinal system. In this scoping review, we attempt to map existing evidence on the role of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in the diagnosis and management of NENs of the gastrointestinal system. After implementation of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we retrieved 44 studies with 53 outcome analyses. We then classified the papers according to the type of studied NET (26 Pan-NETs, 59.1%; 3 metastatic liver NETs (6.8%), 2 small intestinal NETs, 4.5%; colorectal, rectal, non-specified gastroenteropancreatic and non-specified gastrointestinal NETs had from 1 study each, 2.3%). The most frequently used AI algorithms were Supporting Vector Classification/Machine (14 analyses, 29.8%), Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest (10 analyses each, 21.3%), Random Forest (9 analyses, 19.1%), Logistic Regression (8 analyses, 17.0%), and Decision Tree (6 analyses, 12.8%). There was high heterogeneity on the description of the prediction model, structure of datasets, and performance metrics, whereas the majority of studies did not report any external validation set. Future studies should aim at incorporating a uniform structure in accordance with existing guidelines for purposes of reproducibility and research quality, which are prerequisites for integration into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9027316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90273162022-04-23 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review Pantelis, Athanasios G. Panagopoulou, Panagiota A. Lapatsanis, Dimitris P. Diagnostics (Basel) Review Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that may affect any part of the gastrointestinal system. In this scoping review, we attempt to map existing evidence on the role of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in the diagnosis and management of NENs of the gastrointestinal system. After implementation of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we retrieved 44 studies with 53 outcome analyses. We then classified the papers according to the type of studied NET (26 Pan-NETs, 59.1%; 3 metastatic liver NETs (6.8%), 2 small intestinal NETs, 4.5%; colorectal, rectal, non-specified gastroenteropancreatic and non-specified gastrointestinal NETs had from 1 study each, 2.3%). The most frequently used AI algorithms were Supporting Vector Classification/Machine (14 analyses, 29.8%), Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest (10 analyses each, 21.3%), Random Forest (9 analyses, 19.1%), Logistic Regression (8 analyses, 17.0%), and Decision Tree (6 analyses, 12.8%). There was high heterogeneity on the description of the prediction model, structure of datasets, and performance metrics, whereas the majority of studies did not report any external validation set. Future studies should aim at incorporating a uniform structure in accordance with existing guidelines for purposes of reproducibility and research quality, which are prerequisites for integration into clinical practice. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9027316/ /pubmed/35453922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040874 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pantelis, Athanasios G.
Panagopoulou, Panagiota A.
Lapatsanis, Dimitris P.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title_full Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title_short Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms—A Scoping Review
title_sort artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms—a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040874
work_keys_str_mv AT pantelisathanasiosg artificialintelligenceandmachinelearninginthediagnosisandmanagementofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmsascopingreview
AT panagopouloupanagiotaa artificialintelligenceandmachinelearninginthediagnosisandmanagementofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmsascopingreview
AT lapatsanisdimitrisp artificialintelligenceandmachinelearninginthediagnosisandmanagementofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmsascopingreview