Cargando…
Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
Over 40 years of research have shown that traumatic brain injury affects brain volume. However, technical and practical limitations made it difficult to detect brain volume abnormalities in patients suffering from chronic effects of mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. This situation improved in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.715807 |
_version_ | 1784691336756068352 |
---|---|
author | Ross, David E. Seabaugh, John Seabaugh, Jan M. Barcelona, Justis Seabaugh, Daniel Wright, Katherine Norwind, Lee King, Zachary Graham, Travis J. Baker, Joseph Lewis, Tanner |
author_facet | Ross, David E. Seabaugh, John Seabaugh, Jan M. Barcelona, Justis Seabaugh, Daniel Wright, Katherine Norwind, Lee King, Zachary Graham, Travis J. Baker, Joseph Lewis, Tanner |
author_sort | Ross, David E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over 40 years of research have shown that traumatic brain injury affects brain volume. However, technical and practical limitations made it difficult to detect brain volume abnormalities in patients suffering from chronic effects of mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. This situation improved in 2006 with the FDA clearance of NeuroQuant(®), a commercially available, computer-automated software program for measuring MRI brain volume in human subjects. More recent strides were made with the introduction of NeuroGage(®), commercially available software that is based on NeuroQuant(®) and extends its utility in several ways. Studies using these and similar methods have found that most patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury have brain volume abnormalities, and several of these studies found—surprisingly—more abnormal enlargement than atrophy. More generally, 102 peer-reviewed studies have supported the reliability and validity of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®). Furthermore, this updated version of a previous review addresses whether NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) meet the Daubert standard for admissibility in court. It concludes that NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) meet the Daubert standard based on their reliability, validity, and objectivity. Due to the improvements in technology over the years, these brain volumetric techniques are practical and readily available for clinical or forensic use, and thus they are important tools for detecting signs of brain injury. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9027332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90273322022-04-23 Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Ross, David E. Seabaugh, John Seabaugh, Jan M. Barcelona, Justis Seabaugh, Daniel Wright, Katherine Norwind, Lee King, Zachary Graham, Travis J. Baker, Joseph Lewis, Tanner Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Over 40 years of research have shown that traumatic brain injury affects brain volume. However, technical and practical limitations made it difficult to detect brain volume abnormalities in patients suffering from chronic effects of mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. This situation improved in 2006 with the FDA clearance of NeuroQuant(®), a commercially available, computer-automated software program for measuring MRI brain volume in human subjects. More recent strides were made with the introduction of NeuroGage(®), commercially available software that is based on NeuroQuant(®) and extends its utility in several ways. Studies using these and similar methods have found that most patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury have brain volume abnormalities, and several of these studies found—surprisingly—more abnormal enlargement than atrophy. More generally, 102 peer-reviewed studies have supported the reliability and validity of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®). Furthermore, this updated version of a previous review addresses whether NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) meet the Daubert standard for admissibility in court. It concludes that NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) meet the Daubert standard based on their reliability, validity, and objectivity. Due to the improvements in technology over the years, these brain volumetric techniques are practical and readily available for clinical or forensic use, and thus they are important tools for detecting signs of brain injury. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9027332/ /pubmed/35463926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.715807 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ross, Seabaugh, Seabaugh, Barcelona, Seabaugh, Wright, Norwind, King, Graham, Baker and Lewis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ross, David E. Seabaugh, John Seabaugh, Jan M. Barcelona, Justis Seabaugh, Daniel Wright, Katherine Norwind, Lee King, Zachary Graham, Travis J. Baker, Joseph Lewis, Tanner Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title | Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title_full | Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title_fullStr | Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title_short | Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant(®) and NeuroGage(®) in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury |
title_sort | updated review of the evidence supporting the medical and legal use of neuroquant(®) and neurogage(®) in patients with traumatic brain injury |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.715807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossdavide updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT seabaughjohn updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT seabaughjanm updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT barcelonajustis updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT seabaughdaniel updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT wrightkatherine updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT norwindlee updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT kingzachary updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT grahamtravisj updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT bakerjoseph updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury AT lewistanner updatedreviewoftheevidencesupportingthemedicalandlegaluseofneuroquantandneurogageinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury |