Cargando…
Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response
Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. Fully automated segmentation of FGT for BPE cal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020072 |
_version_ | 1784691407045263360 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Alex Anh-Tu Onishi, Natsuko Carmona-Bozo, Julia Li, Wen Kornak, John Newitt, David C. Hylton, Nola M. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Alex Anh-Tu Onishi, Natsuko Carmona-Bozo, Julia Li, Wen Kornak, John Newitt, David C. Hylton, Nola M. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Alex Anh-Tu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. Fully automated segmentation of FGT for BPE calculation is a challenge when image artifacts are present. Low spatial frequency intensity nonuniformity due to coil sensitivity variations is known as bias or inhomogeneity and can affect FGT segmentation and subsequent BPE measurement. In this study, we utilized the N4ITK algorithm for bias correction over a restricted bilateral breast volume and compared the contralateral FGT segmentations based on uncorrected and bias-corrected images in three MRI examinations at pre-treatment, early treatment and inter-regimen timepoints during NAC. A retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts was performed: one with 735 patients enrolled in the multi-center I-SPY 2 TRIAL and the sub-cohort of 340 patients meeting a high-quality benchmark for segmentation. Bias correction substantially increased the FGT segmentation quality for 6.3–8.0% of examinations, while it substantially decreased the quality for no examination. Our results showed improvement in segmentation quality and a small but statistically significant increase in the resulting BPE measurement after bias correction at all timepoints in both cohorts. Continuing studies are examining the effects on pCR prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9027600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90276002022-04-23 Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response Nguyen, Alex Anh-Tu Onishi, Natsuko Carmona-Bozo, Julia Li, Wen Kornak, John Newitt, David C. Hylton, Nola M. Tomography Article Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. Fully automated segmentation of FGT for BPE calculation is a challenge when image artifacts are present. Low spatial frequency intensity nonuniformity due to coil sensitivity variations is known as bias or inhomogeneity and can affect FGT segmentation and subsequent BPE measurement. In this study, we utilized the N4ITK algorithm for bias correction over a restricted bilateral breast volume and compared the contralateral FGT segmentations based on uncorrected and bias-corrected images in three MRI examinations at pre-treatment, early treatment and inter-regimen timepoints during NAC. A retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts was performed: one with 735 patients enrolled in the multi-center I-SPY 2 TRIAL and the sub-cohort of 340 patients meeting a high-quality benchmark for segmentation. Bias correction substantially increased the FGT segmentation quality for 6.3–8.0% of examinations, while it substantially decreased the quality for no examination. Our results showed improvement in segmentation quality and a small but statistically significant increase in the resulting BPE measurement after bias correction at all timepoints in both cohorts. Continuing studies are examining the effects on pCR prediction. MDPI 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9027600/ /pubmed/35448706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020072 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nguyen, Alex Anh-Tu Onishi, Natsuko Carmona-Bozo, Julia Li, Wen Kornak, John Newitt, David C. Hylton, Nola M. Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title | Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title_full | Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title_fullStr | Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title_short | Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response |
title_sort | post-processing bias field inhomogeneity correction for assessing background parenchymal enhancement on breast mri as a quantitative marker of treatment response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenalexanhtu postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT onishinatsuko postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT carmonabozojulia postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT liwen postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT kornakjohn postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT newittdavidc postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse AT hyltonnolam postprocessingbiasfieldinhomogeneitycorrectionforassessingbackgroundparenchymalenhancementonbreastmriasaquantitativemarkeroftreatmentresponse |