Cargando…

Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial

Offering smoking cessation treatment at lung cancer screening (LCS) will maximize mortality reduction associated with screening, but predictors of treatment engagement are not well understood. We examined participant characteristics of engagement in an NCI SCALE cessation trial. Eligible LCS patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Randi M., Eyestone, Ellie, Smith, Laney, Philips, Joanna G., Whealan, Julia, Webster, Marguerite, Li, Tengfei, Luta, George, Taylor, Kathryn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040180
_version_ 1784691431913291776
author Williams, Randi M.
Eyestone, Ellie
Smith, Laney
Philips, Joanna G.
Whealan, Julia
Webster, Marguerite
Li, Tengfei
Luta, George
Taylor, Kathryn L.
author_facet Williams, Randi M.
Eyestone, Ellie
Smith, Laney
Philips, Joanna G.
Whealan, Julia
Webster, Marguerite
Li, Tengfei
Luta, George
Taylor, Kathryn L.
author_sort Williams, Randi M.
collection PubMed
description Offering smoking cessation treatment at lung cancer screening (LCS) will maximize mortality reduction associated with screening, but predictors of treatment engagement are not well understood. We examined participant characteristics of engagement in an NCI SCALE cessation trial. Eligible LCS patients (N = 818) were randomized to the Intensive arm (8 phone counseling sessions +8 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)) vs. Minimal arm (3 sessions + 2 weeks of NRT). Engagement was measured by number of sessions completed (none, some, or all) and NRT mailed (none vs. any) in each arm. In the Intensive arm, those with ≥some college (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.0) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.2) engaged in some counseling vs. none. Individuals with higher nicotine dependence were more likely (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3, 6.2) to request NRT. In the Minimal arm, those with higher education (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.9) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.04, 3.8) completed some sessions vs. none. Requesting NRT was associated with more pack-years (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.5). Regardless of treatment intensity, additional strategies are needed to engage those with lower education, less intensive smoking histories, and undergoing a first scan. These efforts will be important given the broader 2021 LCS guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9027703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90277032022-04-23 Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial Williams, Randi M. Eyestone, Ellie Smith, Laney Philips, Joanna G. Whealan, Julia Webster, Marguerite Li, Tengfei Luta, George Taylor, Kathryn L. Curr Oncol Article Offering smoking cessation treatment at lung cancer screening (LCS) will maximize mortality reduction associated with screening, but predictors of treatment engagement are not well understood. We examined participant characteristics of engagement in an NCI SCALE cessation trial. Eligible LCS patients (N = 818) were randomized to the Intensive arm (8 phone counseling sessions +8 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)) vs. Minimal arm (3 sessions + 2 weeks of NRT). Engagement was measured by number of sessions completed (none, some, or all) and NRT mailed (none vs. any) in each arm. In the Intensive arm, those with ≥some college (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.0) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.2) engaged in some counseling vs. none. Individuals with higher nicotine dependence were more likely (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3, 6.2) to request NRT. In the Minimal arm, those with higher education (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.9) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.04, 3.8) completed some sessions vs. none. Requesting NRT was associated with more pack-years (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.5). Regardless of treatment intensity, additional strategies are needed to engage those with lower education, less intensive smoking histories, and undergoing a first scan. These efforts will be important given the broader 2021 LCS guidelines. MDPI 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9027703/ /pubmed/35448154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040180 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Williams, Randi M.
Eyestone, Ellie
Smith, Laney
Philips, Joanna G.
Whealan, Julia
Webster, Marguerite
Li, Tengfei
Luta, George
Taylor, Kathryn L.
Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title_full Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title_fullStr Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title_full_unstemmed Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title_short Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial
title_sort engaging patients in smoking cessation treatment within the lung cancer screening setting: lessons learned from an nci scale trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040180
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsrandim engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT eyestoneellie engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT smithlaney engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT philipsjoannag engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT whealanjulia engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT webstermarguerite engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT litengfei engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT lutageorge engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT taylorkathrynl engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial
AT engagingpatientsinsmokingcessationtreatmentwithinthelungcancerscreeningsettinglessonslearnedfromannciscaletrial