Cargando…

A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation

Extended nursing roles have existed since the 1940s. The first specialist nurse for Parkinson’s disease, a complex neurodegenerative disease, was appointed in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1989. A review was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tenison, Emma, James, Alice, Ebenezer, Louise, Henderson, Emily J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046
_version_ 1784691441264492544
author Tenison, Emma
James, Alice
Ebenezer, Louise
Henderson, Emily J.
author_facet Tenison, Emma
James, Alice
Ebenezer, Louise
Henderson, Emily J.
author_sort Tenison, Emma
collection PubMed
description Extended nursing roles have existed since the 1940s. The first specialist nurse for Parkinson’s disease, a complex neurodegenerative disease, was appointed in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1989. A review was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), relating to the role and evidence for Parkinson’s disease nurse specialists (PDNSs). PDNSs fulfil many roles. Trials of their effectiveness have failed to show a positive benefit on health outcomes, but their input appears to improve the wellbeing of people with Parkinson’s. Now embedded in the UK Parkinson’s multidisciplinary team, this care model has since been adopted widely, including successful dissemination of training to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. The lack of evidence to support the benefit of PDNSs may reflect an insufficient duration and intensity of the intervention, the outcome measures selected or the need to combine PDNS input with other evidence-based interventions. Whilst the current evidence base for their effectiveness is limited, their input appears to improve subjective patient wellbeing and they are considered a vital resource in management. Better evidence in the future will support the development of these roles and may facilitate the application of specialist nurses to other disease areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9027740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90277402022-04-23 A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation Tenison, Emma James, Alice Ebenezer, Louise Henderson, Emily J. Geriatrics (Basel) Review Extended nursing roles have existed since the 1940s. The first specialist nurse for Parkinson’s disease, a complex neurodegenerative disease, was appointed in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1989. A review was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), relating to the role and evidence for Parkinson’s disease nurse specialists (PDNSs). PDNSs fulfil many roles. Trials of their effectiveness have failed to show a positive benefit on health outcomes, but their input appears to improve the wellbeing of people with Parkinson’s. Now embedded in the UK Parkinson’s multidisciplinary team, this care model has since been adopted widely, including successful dissemination of training to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. The lack of evidence to support the benefit of PDNSs may reflect an insufficient duration and intensity of the intervention, the outcome measures selected or the need to combine PDNS input with other evidence-based interventions. Whilst the current evidence base for their effectiveness is limited, their input appears to improve subjective patient wellbeing and they are considered a vital resource in management. Better evidence in the future will support the development of these roles and may facilitate the application of specialist nurses to other disease areas. MDPI 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9027740/ /pubmed/35447849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tenison, Emma
James, Alice
Ebenezer, Louise
Henderson, Emily J.
A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title_full A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title_fullStr A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title_full_unstemmed A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title_short A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson’s Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation
title_sort narrative review of specialist parkinson’s nurses: evolution, evidence and expectation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7020046
work_keys_str_mv AT tenisonemma anarrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT jamesalice anarrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT ebenezerlouise anarrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT hendersonemilyj anarrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT tenisonemma narrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT jamesalice narrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT ebenezerlouise narrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation
AT hendersonemilyj narrativereviewofspecialistparkinsonsnursesevolutionevidenceandexpectation