Cargando…
Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6 |
_version_ | 1784691465654370304 |
---|---|
author | Rocque, Gabrielle B. Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas Stover, Angela M. Daniel, Casey L. Azuero, Andres Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia Ingram, Stacey A. Franks, Jeffrey A. Caston, Nicole E. Dent, D’ Ambra N. Basch, Ethan M. Jackson, Bradford E. Howell, Doris Weiner, Bryan J. Pierce, Jennifer Young |
author_facet | Rocque, Gabrielle B. Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas Stover, Angela M. Daniel, Casey L. Azuero, Andres Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia Ingram, Stacey A. Franks, Jeffrey A. Caston, Nicole E. Dent, D’ Ambra N. Basch, Ethan M. Jackson, Bradford E. Howell, Doris Weiner, Bryan J. Pierce, Jennifer Young |
author_sort | Rocque, Gabrielle B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out. METHODS: This hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04809740; date of registration 3/22/2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9027833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90278332022-04-23 Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial Rocque, Gabrielle B. Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas Stover, Angela M. Daniel, Casey L. Azuero, Andres Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia Ingram, Stacey A. Franks, Jeffrey A. Caston, Nicole E. Dent, D’ Ambra N. Basch, Ethan M. Jackson, Bradford E. Howell, Doris Weiner, Bryan J. Pierce, Jennifer Young BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out. METHODS: This hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04809740; date of registration 3/22/2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6. BioMed Central 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9027833/ /pubmed/35459238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rocque, Gabrielle B. Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas Stover, Angela M. Daniel, Casey L. Azuero, Andres Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia Ingram, Stacey A. Franks, Jeffrey A. Caston, Nicole E. Dent, D’ Ambra N. Basch, Ethan M. Jackson, Bradford E. Howell, Doris Weiner, Bryan J. Pierce, Jennifer Young Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title | Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rocquegabrielleb evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT dionneodomjnicholas evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT stoverangelam evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT danielcaseyl evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT azueroandres evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT huangchaohuisylvia evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT ingramstaceya evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT franksjeffreya evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT castonnicolee evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT dentdambran evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT baschethanm evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT jacksonbradforde evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT howelldoris evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT weinerbryanj evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial AT piercejenniferyoung evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial |