Cargando…

Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocque, Gabrielle B., Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas, Stover, Angela M., Daniel, Casey L., Azuero, Andres, Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia, Ingram, Stacey A., Franks, Jeffrey A., Caston, Nicole E., Dent, D’ Ambra N., Basch, Ethan M., Jackson, Bradford E., Howell, Doris, Weiner, Bryan J., Pierce, Jennifer Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6
_version_ 1784691465654370304
author Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
Stover, Angela M.
Daniel, Casey L.
Azuero, Andres
Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia
Ingram, Stacey A.
Franks, Jeffrey A.
Caston, Nicole E.
Dent, D’ Ambra N.
Basch, Ethan M.
Jackson, Bradford E.
Howell, Doris
Weiner, Bryan J.
Pierce, Jennifer Young
author_facet Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
Stover, Angela M.
Daniel, Casey L.
Azuero, Andres
Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia
Ingram, Stacey A.
Franks, Jeffrey A.
Caston, Nicole E.
Dent, D’ Ambra N.
Basch, Ethan M.
Jackson, Bradford E.
Howell, Doris
Weiner, Bryan J.
Pierce, Jennifer Young
author_sort Rocque, Gabrielle B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out. METHODS: This hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04809740; date of registration 3/22/2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9027833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90278332022-04-23 Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial Rocque, Gabrielle B. Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas Stover, Angela M. Daniel, Casey L. Azuero, Andres Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia Ingram, Stacey A. Franks, Jeffrey A. Caston, Nicole E. Dent, D’ Ambra N. Basch, Ethan M. Jackson, Bradford E. Howell, Doris Weiner, Bryan J. Pierce, Jennifer Young BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out. METHODS: This hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04809740; date of registration 3/22/2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6. BioMed Central 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9027833/ /pubmed/35459238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
Stover, Angela M.
Daniel, Casey L.
Azuero, Andres
Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia
Ingram, Stacey A.
Franks, Jeffrey A.
Caston, Nicole E.
Dent, D’ Ambra N.
Basch, Ethan M.
Jackson, Bradford E.
Howell, Doris
Weiner, Bryan J.
Pierce, Jennifer Young
Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title_full Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title_short Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
title_sort evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35459238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rocquegabrielleb evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT dionneodomjnicholas evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT stoverangelam evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT danielcaseyl evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT azueroandres evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT huangchaohuisylvia evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT ingramstaceya evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT franksjeffreya evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT castonnicolee evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT dentdambran evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT baschethanm evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT jacksonbradforde evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT howelldoris evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT weinerbryanj evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial
AT piercejenniferyoung evaluatingtheimplementationandimpactofnavigatorsupportedremotesymptommonitoringandmanagementaprotocolforahybridtype2clinicaltrial