Cargando…

Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration

Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobrovolny, Stefanie, Uhlig, Steffen, Frost, Kirstin, Schlierf, Anja, Nichani, Kapil, Simon, Kirsten, Cichna-Markl, Margit, Hochegger, Rupert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108
_version_ 1784691474123718656
author Dobrovolny, Stefanie
Uhlig, Steffen
Frost, Kirstin
Schlierf, Anja
Nichani, Kapil
Simon, Kirsten
Cichna-Markl, Margit
Hochegger, Rupert
author_facet Dobrovolny, Stefanie
Uhlig, Steffen
Frost, Kirstin
Schlierf, Anja
Nichani, Kapil
Simon, Kirsten
Cichna-Markl, Margit
Hochegger, Rupert
author_sort Dobrovolny, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generation of PCR products for DNA barcodes, followed by massively parallel sequencing by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, could be an attractive alternative. DNA metabarcoding is superior to well-established methodologies since it allows simultaneous identification of a wide variety of species not only in individual foodstuffs but even in complex mixtures. We have recently published a DNA metabarcoding assay for the identification and differentiation of 15 mammalian species and six poultry species. With the aim to harmonize analytical methods for food authentication across EU Member States, the DNA metabarcoding assay has been tested in an interlaboratory ring trial including 15 laboratories. Each laboratory analyzed 16 anonymously labelled samples (eight samples, two subsamples each), comprising six DNA extract mixtures, one DNA extract from a model sausage, and one DNA extract from maize (negative control). Evaluation of data on repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, and measurement uncertainty indicated that the DNA metabarcoding method is applicable for meat species authentication in routine analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9027865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90278652022-04-23 Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration Dobrovolny, Stefanie Uhlig, Steffen Frost, Kirstin Schlierf, Anja Nichani, Kapil Simon, Kirsten Cichna-Markl, Margit Hochegger, Rupert Foods Article Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generation of PCR products for DNA barcodes, followed by massively parallel sequencing by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, could be an attractive alternative. DNA metabarcoding is superior to well-established methodologies since it allows simultaneous identification of a wide variety of species not only in individual foodstuffs but even in complex mixtures. We have recently published a DNA metabarcoding assay for the identification and differentiation of 15 mammalian species and six poultry species. With the aim to harmonize analytical methods for food authentication across EU Member States, the DNA metabarcoding assay has been tested in an interlaboratory ring trial including 15 laboratories. Each laboratory analyzed 16 anonymously labelled samples (eight samples, two subsamples each), comprising six DNA extract mixtures, one DNA extract from a model sausage, and one DNA extract from maize (negative control). Evaluation of data on repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, and measurement uncertainty indicated that the DNA metabarcoding method is applicable for meat species authentication in routine analysis. MDPI 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9027865/ /pubmed/35454695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dobrovolny, Stefanie
Uhlig, Steffen
Frost, Kirstin
Schlierf, Anja
Nichani, Kapil
Simon, Kirsten
Cichna-Markl, Margit
Hochegger, Rupert
Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title_full Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title_fullStr Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title_full_unstemmed Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title_short Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
title_sort interlaboratory validation of a dna metabarcoding assay for mammalian and poultry species to detect food adulteration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108
work_keys_str_mv AT dobrovolnystefanie interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT uhligsteffen interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT frostkirstin interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT schlierfanja interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT nichanikapil interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT simonkirsten interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT cichnamarklmargit interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration
AT hocheggerrupert interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration