Cargando…
Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration
Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108 |
_version_ | 1784691474123718656 |
---|---|
author | Dobrovolny, Stefanie Uhlig, Steffen Frost, Kirstin Schlierf, Anja Nichani, Kapil Simon, Kirsten Cichna-Markl, Margit Hochegger, Rupert |
author_facet | Dobrovolny, Stefanie Uhlig, Steffen Frost, Kirstin Schlierf, Anja Nichani, Kapil Simon, Kirsten Cichna-Markl, Margit Hochegger, Rupert |
author_sort | Dobrovolny, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generation of PCR products for DNA barcodes, followed by massively parallel sequencing by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, could be an attractive alternative. DNA metabarcoding is superior to well-established methodologies since it allows simultaneous identification of a wide variety of species not only in individual foodstuffs but even in complex mixtures. We have recently published a DNA metabarcoding assay for the identification and differentiation of 15 mammalian species and six poultry species. With the aim to harmonize analytical methods for food authentication across EU Member States, the DNA metabarcoding assay has been tested in an interlaboratory ring trial including 15 laboratories. Each laboratory analyzed 16 anonymously labelled samples (eight samples, two subsamples each), comprising six DNA extract mixtures, one DNA extract from a model sausage, and one DNA extract from maize (negative control). Evaluation of data on repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, and measurement uncertainty indicated that the DNA metabarcoding method is applicable for meat species authentication in routine analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9027865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90278652022-04-23 Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration Dobrovolny, Stefanie Uhlig, Steffen Frost, Kirstin Schlierf, Anja Nichani, Kapil Simon, Kirsten Cichna-Markl, Margit Hochegger, Rupert Foods Article Meat species authentication in food is most commonly based on the detection of genetic variations. Official food control laboratories frequently apply single and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and/or DNA arrays. However, in the near future, DNA metabarcoding, the generation of PCR products for DNA barcodes, followed by massively parallel sequencing by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, could be an attractive alternative. DNA metabarcoding is superior to well-established methodologies since it allows simultaneous identification of a wide variety of species not only in individual foodstuffs but even in complex mixtures. We have recently published a DNA metabarcoding assay for the identification and differentiation of 15 mammalian species and six poultry species. With the aim to harmonize analytical methods for food authentication across EU Member States, the DNA metabarcoding assay has been tested in an interlaboratory ring trial including 15 laboratories. Each laboratory analyzed 16 anonymously labelled samples (eight samples, two subsamples each), comprising six DNA extract mixtures, one DNA extract from a model sausage, and one DNA extract from maize (negative control). Evaluation of data on repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, and measurement uncertainty indicated that the DNA metabarcoding method is applicable for meat species authentication in routine analysis. MDPI 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9027865/ /pubmed/35454695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dobrovolny, Stefanie Uhlig, Steffen Frost, Kirstin Schlierf, Anja Nichani, Kapil Simon, Kirsten Cichna-Markl, Margit Hochegger, Rupert Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title | Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title_full | Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title_fullStr | Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title_full_unstemmed | Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title_short | Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration |
title_sort | interlaboratory validation of a dna metabarcoding assay for mammalian and poultry species to detect food adulteration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11081108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobrovolnystefanie interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT uhligsteffen interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT frostkirstin interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT schlierfanja interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT nichanikapil interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT simonkirsten interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT cichnamarklmargit interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration AT hocheggerrupert interlaboratoryvalidationofadnametabarcodingassayformammalianandpoultryspeciestodetectfoodadulteration |