Cargando…
Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371 |
_version_ | 1784691555883286528 |
---|---|
author | Di Bella, Gaetano Corsino, Santo Fabio De Marines, Federica Lopresti, Francesco La Carrubba, Vincenzo Torregrossa, Michele Viviani, Gaspare |
author_facet | Di Bella, Gaetano Corsino, Santo Fabio De Marines, Federica Lopresti, Francesco La Carrubba, Vincenzo Torregrossa, Michele Viviani, Gaspare |
author_sort | Di Bella, Gaetano |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3). The microplastics (MPs) concentration in the samples of W3 was approximately 81.1 ± 4.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, whereas MPs concentrations in W1 and W2 were 46.0 ± 14.8 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge and 36.0 ± 5.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, respectively. Moreover, MPs mainly consisted of fragments (66–68%) in the CAS plants, whereas the fractions of MPs shapes in the MBR sludge were more evenly distributed, although fiber (47%) was the most abundant fraction. Furthermore, samples from the MBR showed a greater diversity in MPs composition. Indeed, all the main polyesters (i.e., textile fibers and polyethylene terephthalate), polyolefins (i.e., polyethylene and polypropylene) and rubber (i.e., polybutadiene) were observed, whereas only polybutadiene, cellulose acetate and polyester were detected in the CAS plants. These findings confirmed that MPs from wastewater are transferred and concentrated in the waste sludge. This is a critical finding since sludge disposal could become a new pathway for microplastic release into the environment and because MPs might affect the fouling behavior of the membrane. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9028195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90281952022-04-23 Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies Di Bella, Gaetano Corsino, Santo Fabio De Marines, Federica Lopresti, Francesco La Carrubba, Vincenzo Torregrossa, Michele Viviani, Gaspare Membranes (Basel) Article In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3). The microplastics (MPs) concentration in the samples of W3 was approximately 81.1 ± 4.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, whereas MPs concentrations in W1 and W2 were 46.0 ± 14.8 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge and 36.0 ± 5.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, respectively. Moreover, MPs mainly consisted of fragments (66–68%) in the CAS plants, whereas the fractions of MPs shapes in the MBR sludge were more evenly distributed, although fiber (47%) was the most abundant fraction. Furthermore, samples from the MBR showed a greater diversity in MPs composition. Indeed, all the main polyesters (i.e., textile fibers and polyethylene terephthalate), polyolefins (i.e., polyethylene and polypropylene) and rubber (i.e., polybutadiene) were observed, whereas only polybutadiene, cellulose acetate and polyester were detected in the CAS plants. These findings confirmed that MPs from wastewater are transferred and concentrated in the waste sludge. This is a critical finding since sludge disposal could become a new pathway for microplastic release into the environment and because MPs might affect the fouling behavior of the membrane. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9028195/ /pubmed/35448342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Di Bella, Gaetano Corsino, Santo Fabio De Marines, Federica Lopresti, Francesco La Carrubba, Vincenzo Torregrossa, Michele Viviani, Gaspare Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title | Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title_full | Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title_fullStr | Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title_short | Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies |
title_sort | occurrence of microplastics in waste sludge of wastewater treatment plants: comparison between membrane bioreactor (mbr) and conventional activated sludge (cas) technologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dibellagaetano occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT corsinosantofabio occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT demarinesfederica occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT loprestifrancesco occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT lacarrubbavincenzo occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT torregrossamichele occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies AT vivianigaspare occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies |