Cargando…

Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies

In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Bella, Gaetano, Corsino, Santo Fabio, De Marines, Federica, Lopresti, Francesco, La Carrubba, Vincenzo, Torregrossa, Michele, Viviani, Gaspare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371
_version_ 1784691555883286528
author Di Bella, Gaetano
Corsino, Santo Fabio
De Marines, Federica
Lopresti, Francesco
La Carrubba, Vincenzo
Torregrossa, Michele
Viviani, Gaspare
author_facet Di Bella, Gaetano
Corsino, Santo Fabio
De Marines, Federica
Lopresti, Francesco
La Carrubba, Vincenzo
Torregrossa, Michele
Viviani, Gaspare
author_sort Di Bella, Gaetano
collection PubMed
description In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3). The microplastics (MPs) concentration in the samples of W3 was approximately 81.1 ± 4.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, whereas MPs concentrations in W1 and W2 were 46.0 ± 14.8 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge and 36.0 ± 5.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, respectively. Moreover, MPs mainly consisted of fragments (66–68%) in the CAS plants, whereas the fractions of MPs shapes in the MBR sludge were more evenly distributed, although fiber (47%) was the most abundant fraction. Furthermore, samples from the MBR showed a greater diversity in MPs composition. Indeed, all the main polyesters (i.e., textile fibers and polyethylene terephthalate), polyolefins (i.e., polyethylene and polypropylene) and rubber (i.e., polybutadiene) were observed, whereas only polybutadiene, cellulose acetate and polyester were detected in the CAS plants. These findings confirmed that MPs from wastewater are transferred and concentrated in the waste sludge. This is a critical finding since sludge disposal could become a new pathway for microplastic release into the environment and because MPs might affect the fouling behavior of the membrane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9028195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90281952022-04-23 Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies Di Bella, Gaetano Corsino, Santo Fabio De Marines, Federica Lopresti, Francesco La Carrubba, Vincenzo Torregrossa, Michele Viviani, Gaspare Membranes (Basel) Article In this study, the presence of microplastics in the sludge of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was examined. The investigated WWTPs operated based on a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, with (W1) or without (W2) primary clarification, and a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) (W3). The microplastics (MPs) concentration in the samples of W3 was approximately 81.1 ± 4.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, whereas MPs concentrations in W1 and W2 were 46.0 ± 14.8 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge and 36.0 ± 5.2 × 10(3) particles/kg dry sludge, respectively. Moreover, MPs mainly consisted of fragments (66–68%) in the CAS plants, whereas the fractions of MPs shapes in the MBR sludge were more evenly distributed, although fiber (47%) was the most abundant fraction. Furthermore, samples from the MBR showed a greater diversity in MPs composition. Indeed, all the main polyesters (i.e., textile fibers and polyethylene terephthalate), polyolefins (i.e., polyethylene and polypropylene) and rubber (i.e., polybutadiene) were observed, whereas only polybutadiene, cellulose acetate and polyester were detected in the CAS plants. These findings confirmed that MPs from wastewater are transferred and concentrated in the waste sludge. This is a critical finding since sludge disposal could become a new pathway for microplastic release into the environment and because MPs might affect the fouling behavior of the membrane. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9028195/ /pubmed/35448342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Bella, Gaetano
Corsino, Santo Fabio
De Marines, Federica
Lopresti, Francesco
La Carrubba, Vincenzo
Torregrossa, Michele
Viviani, Gaspare
Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title_full Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title_fullStr Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title_short Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies
title_sort occurrence of microplastics in waste sludge of wastewater treatment plants: comparison between membrane bioreactor (mbr) and conventional activated sludge (cas) technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040371
work_keys_str_mv AT dibellagaetano occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT corsinosantofabio occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT demarinesfederica occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT loprestifrancesco occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT lacarrubbavincenzo occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT torregrossamichele occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies
AT vivianigaspare occurrenceofmicroplasticsinwastesludgeofwastewatertreatmentplantscomparisonbetweenmembranebioreactormbrandconventionalactivatedsludgecastechnologies