Cargando…

Innervated Reconstruction of Fingertip Degloving Injury Using a Dorsal Digital Perforator Flap Combined With a Cross-Finger Flap

BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of a fingertip degloving injury presents a functional and aesthetic challenge. We used a dorsal digital perforator flap combined with a cross-finger flap to reconstruct this type of injury. The purposes of this retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy of the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tongfu, Wang, Li, Wang, Hui, Zhang, Wenlong, Yu, Zhiliang, Zhang, Jingyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003110
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of a fingertip degloving injury presents a functional and aesthetic challenge. We used a dorsal digital perforator flap combined with a cross-finger flap to reconstruct this type of injury. The purposes of this retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy of the combined flaps and to present our clinical experience. METHODS: From November 2016 to October 2019, 16 patients (13 men and 3 women) with fingertip degloving injuries were treated with a dorsal digital perforator flap combined with a cross-finger flap for innervated reconstruction. We used an innervated dorsal digital perforator flap for the reconstruction of the dorsal defect of the degloved fingertip and an innervated cross-finger flap for the volar defect. The average size of the defect was 4.2 × 1.9 cm. The average sizes of the flaps were 2.3 × 2.1 cm (the dorsal digital perforator flap) and 2.5 × 2.1 cm (the cross-finger flap). RESULTS: All flaps and skin grafts survived completely without ischemia or venous congestion. All wounds and their donor sites healed primarily without exudation and infection. Patients were followed up for a mean time of 11.3 ± 1.9 months (range, 9–15 months). At the final follow-up, no significant difference was seen in the averaged total active motion between the injured fingers and the contralateral fingers. No significant difference was found in the averaged total active motion between the donor fingers and the contralateral fingers. All flaps obtained excellent or good sensory performance. All flaps had mild cold intolerance. Thirteen patients had no pain, 2 reported mild pain, and 1 experienced moderate pain. Ten patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the reconstructed finger. CONCLUSIONS: The dorsal digital perforator flap combined with a cross-finger flap is an effective and reliable method for the reconstruction of fingertip degloving injuries.