Cargando…
The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience
PROBLEM: In the 2021 residency application cycle, the average otolaryngology applicant applied to more than half of programs. Increasing application numbers make it difficult for applicants to stand out to programs of interest and for programs to identify applicants with sincere interest. APPROACH:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34618735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441 |
_version_ | 1784691582459445248 |
---|---|
author | Pletcher, Steven D. Chang, C.W. David Thorne, Marc C. Malekzadeh, Sonya |
author_facet | Pletcher, Steven D. Chang, C.W. David Thorne, Marc C. Malekzadeh, Sonya |
author_sort | Pletcher, Steven D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PROBLEM: In the 2021 residency application cycle, the average otolaryngology applicant applied to more than half of programs. Increasing application numbers make it difficult for applicants to stand out to programs of interest and for programs to identify applicants with sincere interest. APPROACH: As part of the 2021 Match, otolaryngology applicants could participate in a preference signaling process, signaling up to 5 programs of particular interest at the time of application submission. Programs received a list of applicants who submitted signals to consider during interview offer deliberations. Applicants and program directors completed surveys to evaluate the signaling process and assess the impact of signals on interview offers. OUTCOMES: All otolaryngology residency programs participated in the signaling process. In total, 611 students submitted applications for otolaryngology residency programs, 559 applicants submitted a Match list including an otolaryngology program, and 558 applicants participated in the signaling process. The survey response rate was 42% for applicants (n = 233) and 52% for program directors (n = 62). The rate of receiving an interview offer was significantly higher from signaled programs (58%) than from both nonsignaled programs (14%; P < .001) and the comparative nonsignal program (23%; P < .001) (i.e., the program an applicant would have signaled given a sixth signal). This impact was consistent across the spectrum of applicant competitiveness. Applicants (178, 77%) and program directors (53, 91%) strongly favored continuing the program. NEXT STEPS: Many specialties face high residency application numbers. Programs have difficulty identifying applicants with sincere interest, and applicants face limited opportunities to identify programs of particular interest. Applicants to these specialties may benefit from a preference signaling process like that in otolaryngology. Additional evaluation is needed to determine the impact of signals across racial and demographic lines and to validate these early outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9028299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90282992022-04-28 The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience Pletcher, Steven D. Chang, C.W. David Thorne, Marc C. Malekzadeh, Sonya Acad Med Innovation Reports PROBLEM: In the 2021 residency application cycle, the average otolaryngology applicant applied to more than half of programs. Increasing application numbers make it difficult for applicants to stand out to programs of interest and for programs to identify applicants with sincere interest. APPROACH: As part of the 2021 Match, otolaryngology applicants could participate in a preference signaling process, signaling up to 5 programs of particular interest at the time of application submission. Programs received a list of applicants who submitted signals to consider during interview offer deliberations. Applicants and program directors completed surveys to evaluate the signaling process and assess the impact of signals on interview offers. OUTCOMES: All otolaryngology residency programs participated in the signaling process. In total, 611 students submitted applications for otolaryngology residency programs, 559 applicants submitted a Match list including an otolaryngology program, and 558 applicants participated in the signaling process. The survey response rate was 42% for applicants (n = 233) and 52% for program directors (n = 62). The rate of receiving an interview offer was significantly higher from signaled programs (58%) than from both nonsignaled programs (14%; P < .001) and the comparative nonsignal program (23%; P < .001) (i.e., the program an applicant would have signaled given a sixth signal). This impact was consistent across the spectrum of applicant competitiveness. Applicants (178, 77%) and program directors (53, 91%) strongly favored continuing the program. NEXT STEPS: Many specialties face high residency application numbers. Programs have difficulty identifying applicants with sincere interest, and applicants face limited opportunities to identify programs of particular interest. Applicants to these specialties may benefit from a preference signaling process like that in otolaryngology. Additional evaluation is needed to determine the impact of signals across racial and demographic lines and to validate these early outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-10-05 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9028299/ /pubmed/34618735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Innovation Reports Pletcher, Steven D. Chang, C.W. David Thorne, Marc C. Malekzadeh, Sonya The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title | The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title_full | The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title_fullStr | The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title_short | The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience |
title_sort | otolaryngology residency program preference signaling experience |
topic | Innovation Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34618735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pletcherstevend theotolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT changcwdavid theotolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT thornemarcc theotolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT malekzadehsonya theotolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT pletcherstevend otolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT changcwdavid otolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT thornemarcc otolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience AT malekzadehsonya otolaryngologyresidencyprogrampreferencesignalingexperience |