Cargando…

Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing

Background. There are several in vitro testing options to investigate the efficacy of sports mouthguards. None of these represent everyday situations, but the effects of simple laws of physics can be observed. This enables the comparison of conventional materials for mouthguards towards fabrications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schewe, Philipp, Roehler, Ariadne, Spintzyk, Sebastian, Huettig, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15082928
_version_ 1784691598523629568
author Schewe, Philipp
Roehler, Ariadne
Spintzyk, Sebastian
Huettig, Fabian
author_facet Schewe, Philipp
Roehler, Ariadne
Spintzyk, Sebastian
Huettig, Fabian
author_sort Schewe, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Background. There are several in vitro testing options to investigate the efficacy of sports mouthguards. None of these represent everyday situations, but the effects of simple laws of physics can be observed. This enables the comparison of conventional materials for mouthguards towards fabrications from additive manufacturing. Methods. A ball-drop experiment measured the maximum force and temporospatial distribution of a vertical impact on six material groups and a reference group (No-MG). Three conventional materials (ethylenvinylacetate) with 1, 2, and 3 layers were compared with additively manufactured (AM) specimens of comparable layering with a respective thickness of 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6.8 mm. Results. A maximum force of 8982.35 N ± 305.18 (No-MG) was maximum damped to 2470.60 N ± 87.00 (conventional 6.8 mm) compared with 5585.09 N ± 203.99 (AM 6.8 mm) Thereby, the ratio between shock absorption per millimeter was best for 4 mm thickness with means of 1722 N (conventional) and 624 N (AM). Conclusions. Polymer layers demonstrated a force reduction up to 71.68%. For now, additively processed resins of comparable hardness and layering are inferior to conventional fabrications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9028363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90283632022-04-23 Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing Schewe, Philipp Roehler, Ariadne Spintzyk, Sebastian Huettig, Fabian Materials (Basel) Article Background. There are several in vitro testing options to investigate the efficacy of sports mouthguards. None of these represent everyday situations, but the effects of simple laws of physics can be observed. This enables the comparison of conventional materials for mouthguards towards fabrications from additive manufacturing. Methods. A ball-drop experiment measured the maximum force and temporospatial distribution of a vertical impact on six material groups and a reference group (No-MG). Three conventional materials (ethylenvinylacetate) with 1, 2, and 3 layers were compared with additively manufactured (AM) specimens of comparable layering with a respective thickness of 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6.8 mm. Results. A maximum force of 8982.35 N ± 305.18 (No-MG) was maximum damped to 2470.60 N ± 87.00 (conventional 6.8 mm) compared with 5585.09 N ± 203.99 (AM 6.8 mm) Thereby, the ratio between shock absorption per millimeter was best for 4 mm thickness with means of 1722 N (conventional) and 624 N (AM). Conclusions. Polymer layers demonstrated a force reduction up to 71.68%. For now, additively processed resins of comparable hardness and layering are inferior to conventional fabrications. MDPI 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9028363/ /pubmed/35454621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15082928 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schewe, Philipp
Roehler, Ariadne
Spintzyk, Sebastian
Huettig, Fabian
Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title_full Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title_fullStr Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title_short Shock Absorption Behavior of Elastic Polymers for Sports Mouthguards: An In Vitro Comparison of Thermoplastic Forming and Additive Manufacturing
title_sort shock absorption behavior of elastic polymers for sports mouthguards: an in vitro comparison of thermoplastic forming and additive manufacturing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15082928
work_keys_str_mv AT schewephilipp shockabsorptionbehaviorofelasticpolymersforsportsmouthguardsaninvitrocomparisonofthermoplasticformingandadditivemanufacturing
AT roehlerariadne shockabsorptionbehaviorofelasticpolymersforsportsmouthguardsaninvitrocomparisonofthermoplasticformingandadditivemanufacturing
AT spintzyksebastian shockabsorptionbehaviorofelasticpolymersforsportsmouthguardsaninvitrocomparisonofthermoplasticformingandadditivemanufacturing
AT huettigfabian shockabsorptionbehaviorofelasticpolymersforsportsmouthguardsaninvitrocomparisonofthermoplasticformingandadditivemanufacturing