Cargando…

MR brain tissue classification based on the spatial information enhanced Gaussian mixture model

BACKGROUND: Classifying T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance brain scans into cerebrospinal fluid, gray matter and white matter is one of the most critical tasks in neurodegenerative disease analysis. Since manual delineation is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process, automated methods have been wid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bian, Zijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-228008
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Classifying T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance brain scans into cerebrospinal fluid, gray matter and white matter is one of the most critical tasks in neurodegenerative disease analysis. Since manual delineation is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process, automated methods have been widely adopted for this purpose. One group of commonly used method by biomedical researchers are based on Gaussian mixture model. The main drawbacks of this model include complex computational cost and parameter selection with the presence of imaging defects such as intensity inhomogeneity and noise. OBJECTIVE: To alleviate these aspects, an improved Gaussian mixture model-based method is proposed in this work. METHODS: Standard mixture model was used to formulate individual voxel intensity. A set of spatial weightings were created to represent local tissue characteristics. The emphasis of this method is its “lite” and robust implementation mode highlighted by a dedicated entropy term. The Expectation-Maximization algorithm was then iteratively executed to estimate model parameters. The Maximum a Posteriori criterion was employed to determine for each voxel if it belongs to a certain tissue. RESULTS: The proposed method was validated on both simulated and real MR scans. The averaged Dice coefficient of segmented brain tissues on each dataset ranged between [66.41, 87.42] for cerebrospinal fluid, [80.57, 85.35] for gray matter, and [83.17, 85.63] for white matter. CONCLUSIONS: Experiments illustrated the effectiveness and reliability in tissue classification against imaging defects compared with manually constructed reference standard.