Cargando…

What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The number of insects that feed on an individual tree can be influenced by the growth of leaves during the season, the size of the tree, genetic traits that affect leaf quality, and by the tree species that surround it. To estimate the relative importance of these processes, we deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molleman, Freerk, Walczak, Urszula, Melosik, Iwona, Baraniak, Edward, Piosik, Łukasz, Prinzing, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects13040367
_version_ 1784691876634296320
author Molleman, Freerk
Walczak, Urszula
Melosik, Iwona
Baraniak, Edward
Piosik, Łukasz
Prinzing, Andreas
author_facet Molleman, Freerk
Walczak, Urszula
Melosik, Iwona
Baraniak, Edward
Piosik, Łukasz
Prinzing, Andreas
author_sort Molleman, Freerk
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The number of insects that feed on an individual tree can be influenced by the growth of leaves during the season, the size of the tree, genetic traits that affect leaf quality, and by the tree species that surround it. To estimate the relative importance of these processes, we determined the date on which leaves start unfolding in spring, trunk diameter, genotype, and neighbourhood of sessile oak trees, and sampled their caterpillar communities. We found that free-living caterpillars were less abundant on older leaves. Caterpillars were less diverse and experienced higher parasitism on larger trees. Leaf-mining casebearers were more abundant on trees that were genetically more homozygous. However, genome size was not important for any guild. In contrast to most previous studies, oaks surrounded by distantly related tree species tended to have higher caterpillar densities. Neighbourhoods were also related to species composition and diversity, but not to the average wingspans or specialization of species. Common species were less abundant on trees with high parasitism rates. Our results suggest that trees are not always better off in diverse forests, as large trees surrounded by distantly related species might actually suffer more insect damage. ABSTRACT: Communities of herbivorous insects on individual host trees may be driven by processes ranging from ongoing development via recent microevolution to ancient phylogeny, but the relative importance of these processes and whether they operate via trophic interactions or herbivore movement remains unknown. We determined the leaf phenology, trunk diameter, genotype, and neighbourhood of sessile oak trees (Quercus petraea), and sampled their caterpillar communities. We found that leaf development across a time period of days related to free-living caterpillars, which disappeared with leaf age. Tree growth across decades is related to increased parasitism rate and diversity of herbivores. The microevolution of oak trees across millennia is related to the abundance of leaf-mining casebearers, which is higher on more homozygous oaks. However, oak genome size was not important for any guild. In contrast to most previous studies, the phylogenetic distance of oaks from their neighbours measured in millions of years was associated with higher abundances of entire caterpillar guilds. Furthermore, on trees surrounded by only distantly related tree species, parasitism tended to be lower. Lower parasitism, in turn, was associated with higher abundances of codominant caterpillar species. Neighbourhoods and traits of trees were also related to community composition and diversity, but not to the average wingspans or specialization of species, consistent with the assembly of herbivore communities being driven by leaf traits and parasitism pressure on trees rather than by insect movement among trees. However, movement in rarer species may be responsible for concentration effects in more phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods. Overall, we suggest that the assembly of insects on a tree is mostly driven by trophic interactions controlled by a mosaic of processes playing out over very different time scales. Comparisons with the literature further suggest that, for oak trees, the consequences of growing amongst distantly related tree species may depend on factors such as geographic region and tree age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9029432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90294322022-04-23 What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood? Molleman, Freerk Walczak, Urszula Melosik, Iwona Baraniak, Edward Piosik, Łukasz Prinzing, Andreas Insects Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The number of insects that feed on an individual tree can be influenced by the growth of leaves during the season, the size of the tree, genetic traits that affect leaf quality, and by the tree species that surround it. To estimate the relative importance of these processes, we determined the date on which leaves start unfolding in spring, trunk diameter, genotype, and neighbourhood of sessile oak trees, and sampled their caterpillar communities. We found that free-living caterpillars were less abundant on older leaves. Caterpillars were less diverse and experienced higher parasitism on larger trees. Leaf-mining casebearers were more abundant on trees that were genetically more homozygous. However, genome size was not important for any guild. In contrast to most previous studies, oaks surrounded by distantly related tree species tended to have higher caterpillar densities. Neighbourhoods were also related to species composition and diversity, but not to the average wingspans or specialization of species. Common species were less abundant on trees with high parasitism rates. Our results suggest that trees are not always better off in diverse forests, as large trees surrounded by distantly related species might actually suffer more insect damage. ABSTRACT: Communities of herbivorous insects on individual host trees may be driven by processes ranging from ongoing development via recent microevolution to ancient phylogeny, but the relative importance of these processes and whether they operate via trophic interactions or herbivore movement remains unknown. We determined the leaf phenology, trunk diameter, genotype, and neighbourhood of sessile oak trees (Quercus petraea), and sampled their caterpillar communities. We found that leaf development across a time period of days related to free-living caterpillars, which disappeared with leaf age. Tree growth across decades is related to increased parasitism rate and diversity of herbivores. The microevolution of oak trees across millennia is related to the abundance of leaf-mining casebearers, which is higher on more homozygous oaks. However, oak genome size was not important for any guild. In contrast to most previous studies, the phylogenetic distance of oaks from their neighbours measured in millions of years was associated with higher abundances of entire caterpillar guilds. Furthermore, on trees surrounded by only distantly related tree species, parasitism tended to be lower. Lower parasitism, in turn, was associated with higher abundances of codominant caterpillar species. Neighbourhoods and traits of trees were also related to community composition and diversity, but not to the average wingspans or specialization of species, consistent with the assembly of herbivore communities being driven by leaf traits and parasitism pressure on trees rather than by insect movement among trees. However, movement in rarer species may be responsible for concentration effects in more phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods. Overall, we suggest that the assembly of insects on a tree is mostly driven by trophic interactions controlled by a mosaic of processes playing out over very different time scales. Comparisons with the literature further suggest that, for oak trees, the consequences of growing amongst distantly related tree species may depend on factors such as geographic region and tree age. MDPI 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9029432/ /pubmed/35447809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects13040367 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Molleman, Freerk
Walczak, Urszula
Melosik, Iwona
Baraniak, Edward
Piosik, Łukasz
Prinzing, Andreas
What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title_full What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title_fullStr What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title_full_unstemmed What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title_short What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
title_sort what drives caterpillar guilds on a tree: enemy pressure, leaf or tree growth, genetic traits, or phylogenetic neighbourhood?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects13040367
work_keys_str_mv AT mollemanfreerk whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood
AT walczakurszula whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood
AT melosikiwona whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood
AT baraniakedward whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood
AT piosikłukasz whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood
AT prinzingandreas whatdrivescaterpillarguildsonatreeenemypressureleafortreegrowthgenetictraitsorphylogeneticneighbourhood