Cargando…

A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment

Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan, Judd, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391
_version_ 1784691878227083264
author Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Judd, Simon J.
author_facet Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Judd, Simon J.
author_sort Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
collection PubMed
description Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated physicochemically to remove the oil prior to discharge, whereas the onshore effluents are often treated biologically to remove both the suspended and dissolved organic fractions. This review examines the efficacy and extent of implementation of membrane technology for these two distinct applications, focusing on data and information pertaining to the treatment of real effluents at large/full scale. Reported data trends from PW membrane filtration reveal that, notwithstanding extensive testing of ceramic membrane material for this duty, the mean fluxes sustained are highly variable and generally insufficiently high for offshore treatment on oil platforms where space is limited. This appears to be associated with the use of polymer for chemically-enhanced enhanced oil recovery, which causes significant membrane fouling impairing membrane permeability. Against this, the application of MBRs to onshore oil effluent treatment is well established, with a relatively narrow range of flux values reported (9–17 L·m(−2)·h(−1)) and >80% COD removal. It is concluded that the prospects of MBRs for petroleum industry effluent treatment are more favorable than implementation of membrane filtration for offshore PW treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9029438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90294382022-04-23 A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Judd, Simon J. Membranes (Basel) Review Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated physicochemically to remove the oil prior to discharge, whereas the onshore effluents are often treated biologically to remove both the suspended and dissolved organic fractions. This review examines the efficacy and extent of implementation of membrane technology for these two distinct applications, focusing on data and information pertaining to the treatment of real effluents at large/full scale. Reported data trends from PW membrane filtration reveal that, notwithstanding extensive testing of ceramic membrane material for this duty, the mean fluxes sustained are highly variable and generally insufficiently high for offshore treatment on oil platforms where space is limited. This appears to be associated with the use of polymer for chemically-enhanced enhanced oil recovery, which causes significant membrane fouling impairing membrane permeability. Against this, the application of MBRs to onshore oil effluent treatment is well established, with a relatively narrow range of flux values reported (9–17 L·m(−2)·h(−1)) and >80% COD removal. It is concluded that the prospects of MBRs for petroleum industry effluent treatment are more favorable than implementation of membrane filtration for offshore PW treatment. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9029438/ /pubmed/35448361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan
Judd, Simon J.
A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title_full A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title_fullStr A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title_full_unstemmed A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title_short A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
title_sort brief review of the status of low-pressure membrane technology implementation for petroleum industry effluent treatment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391
work_keys_str_mv AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan abriefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment
AT juddsimonj abriefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment
AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan briefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment
AT juddsimonj briefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment