Cargando…
A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment
Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated ph...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391 |
_version_ | 1784691878227083264 |
---|---|
author | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Judd, Simon J. |
author_facet | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Judd, Simon J. |
author_sort | Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated physicochemically to remove the oil prior to discharge, whereas the onshore effluents are often treated biologically to remove both the suspended and dissolved organic fractions. This review examines the efficacy and extent of implementation of membrane technology for these two distinct applications, focusing on data and information pertaining to the treatment of real effluents at large/full scale. Reported data trends from PW membrane filtration reveal that, notwithstanding extensive testing of ceramic membrane material for this duty, the mean fluxes sustained are highly variable and generally insufficiently high for offshore treatment on oil platforms where space is limited. This appears to be associated with the use of polymer for chemically-enhanced enhanced oil recovery, which causes significant membrane fouling impairing membrane permeability. Against this, the application of MBRs to onshore oil effluent treatment is well established, with a relatively narrow range of flux values reported (9–17 L·m(−2)·h(−1)) and >80% COD removal. It is concluded that the prospects of MBRs for petroleum industry effluent treatment are more favorable than implementation of membrane filtration for offshore PW treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9029438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90294382022-04-23 A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Judd, Simon J. Membranes (Basel) Review Low-pressure membrane technology (ultrafiltration and microfiltration) has been applied to two key effluents generated by the petroleum industry: produced water (PW) from oil exploration, a significant proportion being generated offshore, and onshore refinery/petrochemical effluent. PW is treated physicochemically to remove the oil prior to discharge, whereas the onshore effluents are often treated biologically to remove both the suspended and dissolved organic fractions. This review examines the efficacy and extent of implementation of membrane technology for these two distinct applications, focusing on data and information pertaining to the treatment of real effluents at large/full scale. Reported data trends from PW membrane filtration reveal that, notwithstanding extensive testing of ceramic membrane material for this duty, the mean fluxes sustained are highly variable and generally insufficiently high for offshore treatment on oil platforms where space is limited. This appears to be associated with the use of polymer for chemically-enhanced enhanced oil recovery, which causes significant membrane fouling impairing membrane permeability. Against this, the application of MBRs to onshore oil effluent treatment is well established, with a relatively narrow range of flux values reported (9–17 L·m(−2)·h(−1)) and >80% COD removal. It is concluded that the prospects of MBRs for petroleum industry effluent treatment are more favorable than implementation of membrane filtration for offshore PW treatment. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9029438/ /pubmed/35448361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Dizayee, Kasro Kakil Hassan Judd, Simon J. A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title | A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title_full | A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title_fullStr | A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title_short | A Brief Review of the Status of Low-Pressure Membrane Technology Implementation for Petroleum Industry Effluent Treatment |
title_sort | brief review of the status of low-pressure membrane technology implementation for petroleum industry effluent treatment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35448361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan abriefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment AT juddsimonj abriefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment AT dizayeekasrokakilhassan briefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment AT juddsimonj briefreviewofthestatusoflowpressuremembranetechnologyimplementationforpetroleumindustryeffluenttreatment |