Cargando…
Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Oral cancer was considered a disease of old age. However, there has been a recent surge in the incidence of oral cancer in young individuals. Age dependence on survival outcomes such as overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, distant metastasis and second primary in surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081886 |
_version_ | 1784691932378693632 |
---|---|
author | Panda, Swagatika Mohanty, Neeta Panda, Saurav Mishra, Lora Gopinath, Divya Sahoo, Alkananda Nagraj, Sumanth Kumbargere Lapinska, Barbara |
author_facet | Panda, Swagatika Mohanty, Neeta Panda, Saurav Mishra, Lora Gopinath, Divya Sahoo, Alkananda Nagraj, Sumanth Kumbargere Lapinska, Barbara |
author_sort | Panda, Swagatika |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Oral cancer was considered a disease of old age. However, there has been a recent surge in the incidence of oral cancer in young individuals. Age dependence on survival outcomes such as overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, distant metastasis and second primary in surgically treated oral cancer has been investigated several times and the results differ. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to address this concern. The results of the present research may facilitate age-dependent prognosis stratification, which would assist in treatment planning in oral cancer patients. ABSTRACT: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address whether age can be a determinant of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence, distant metastasis (DM) and second primary (SP) in surgically treated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOPSCC). A total of 4981 cases and 44254 controls from 25 comparative observational studies were included in the analysis. A significantly better OS (matched subgroup analysis: OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.31–2.04, overall analysis: OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.09–2.01) was observed in young patients compared to older adults, with heterogeneity ranging from moderate to severe. Worse DFS (unmatched subgroup analysis OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.27–0.68) was observed in young patients compared to older adults with minimal to moderate heterogeneity. The frequency of recurrence (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10–2.02) and DM (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.10–3.03) was significantly higher in the young patients, as found in unmatched and matched subgroup analysis, with the least heterogeneities. Young age can be considered as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and distant metastases in OOP-SCC. Larger and methodologically robust observational studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish the definitive role of age as an independent prognostic factor on OS and DFS in OOPSCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9029651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90296512022-04-23 Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Panda, Swagatika Mohanty, Neeta Panda, Saurav Mishra, Lora Gopinath, Divya Sahoo, Alkananda Nagraj, Sumanth Kumbargere Lapinska, Barbara Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Oral cancer was considered a disease of old age. However, there has been a recent surge in the incidence of oral cancer in young individuals. Age dependence on survival outcomes such as overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, distant metastasis and second primary in surgically treated oral cancer has been investigated several times and the results differ. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to address this concern. The results of the present research may facilitate age-dependent prognosis stratification, which would assist in treatment planning in oral cancer patients. ABSTRACT: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address whether age can be a determinant of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence, distant metastasis (DM) and second primary (SP) in surgically treated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOPSCC). A total of 4981 cases and 44254 controls from 25 comparative observational studies were included in the analysis. A significantly better OS (matched subgroup analysis: OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.31–2.04, overall analysis: OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.09–2.01) was observed in young patients compared to older adults, with heterogeneity ranging from moderate to severe. Worse DFS (unmatched subgroup analysis OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.27–0.68) was observed in young patients compared to older adults with minimal to moderate heterogeneity. The frequency of recurrence (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10–2.02) and DM (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.10–3.03) was significantly higher in the young patients, as found in unmatched and matched subgroup analysis, with the least heterogeneities. Young age can be considered as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and distant metastases in OOP-SCC. Larger and methodologically robust observational studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish the definitive role of age as an independent prognostic factor on OS and DFS in OOPSCC. MDPI 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9029651/ /pubmed/35454794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081886 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Panda, Swagatika Mohanty, Neeta Panda, Saurav Mishra, Lora Gopinath, Divya Sahoo, Alkananda Nagraj, Sumanth Kumbargere Lapinska, Barbara Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | are survival outcomes different for young and old patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35454794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14081886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandaswagatika aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohantyneeta aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pandasaurav aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mishralora aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gopinathdivya aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sahooalkananda aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nagrajsumanthkumbargere aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lapinskabarbara aresurvivaloutcomesdifferentforyoungandoldpatientswithoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |