Cargando…

Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise

Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common cause of lumbar radiculopathy and conventionally assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in supine-positioned patients. An MRI acquired during spine loading may unmask pathology not otherwise revealed in a relaxed position. Therefore, we investigated how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hebelka, Hanna, Rydberg, Niklas, Hutchins, John, Lagerstrand, Kerstin, Brisby, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082122
_version_ 1784691934526177280
author Hebelka, Hanna
Rydberg, Niklas
Hutchins, John
Lagerstrand, Kerstin
Brisby, Helena
author_facet Hebelka, Hanna
Rydberg, Niklas
Hutchins, John
Lagerstrand, Kerstin
Brisby, Helena
author_sort Hebelka, Hanna
collection PubMed
description Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common cause of lumbar radiculopathy and conventionally assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in supine-positioned patients. An MRI acquired during spine loading may unmask pathology not otherwise revealed in a relaxed position. Therefore, we investigated how spine loading during MRI affects lumbar foramina. In 89 low-back pain patients’ lumbar, MRIs were performed in a relaxed supine position and during axial loading using a Dynawell(®) compression device. The smallest area of all intervertebral foramina at levels L3/L4–L5/S1 (534 foramina) was determined using a freehand polygonal tool in parasagittal T2-weighted sequences. The grading system described by Lee et al. was also used to qualitatively assess foraminal stenosis. Overall, a mean reduction of 2.2% (mean −0.89 cm(2) and −0.87 cm(2), respectively) was observed (p = 0.002), however for individual foramina large variations, with up to about 50% increase or decrease, were seen. Stratified for lumbar level, an area reduction was found for L3/L4 and L4/L5 foramina (mean change −0.03 cm(2); p = 0.036; and −0.03 cm(2); p = 0.004, respectively) but not for L5/S1. When comparing the measured area changes to qualitative foraminal grading, 22% of the foramina with a measured area decrease were evaluated with a higher grading. Thus, detailed information on foraminal appearance and nerve root affection can be obtained using this method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9029659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90296592022-04-23 Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise Hebelka, Hanna Rydberg, Niklas Hutchins, John Lagerstrand, Kerstin Brisby, Helena J Clin Med Article Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common cause of lumbar radiculopathy and conventionally assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in supine-positioned patients. An MRI acquired during spine loading may unmask pathology not otherwise revealed in a relaxed position. Therefore, we investigated how spine loading during MRI affects lumbar foramina. In 89 low-back pain patients’ lumbar, MRIs were performed in a relaxed supine position and during axial loading using a Dynawell(®) compression device. The smallest area of all intervertebral foramina at levels L3/L4–L5/S1 (534 foramina) was determined using a freehand polygonal tool in parasagittal T2-weighted sequences. The grading system described by Lee et al. was also used to qualitatively assess foraminal stenosis. Overall, a mean reduction of 2.2% (mean −0.89 cm(2) and −0.87 cm(2), respectively) was observed (p = 0.002), however for individual foramina large variations, with up to about 50% increase or decrease, were seen. Stratified for lumbar level, an area reduction was found for L3/L4 and L4/L5 foramina (mean change −0.03 cm(2); p = 0.036; and −0.03 cm(2); p = 0.004, respectively) but not for L5/S1. When comparing the measured area changes to qualitative foraminal grading, 22% of the foramina with a measured area decrease were evaluated with a higher grading. Thus, detailed information on foraminal appearance and nerve root affection can be obtained using this method. MDPI 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9029659/ /pubmed/35456215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082122 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hebelka, Hanna
Rydberg, Niklas
Hutchins, John
Lagerstrand, Kerstin
Brisby, Helena
Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title_full Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title_fullStr Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title_full_unstemmed Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title_short Axial Loading during MRI Induces Lumbar Foraminal Area Changes and Has the Potential to Improve Diagnostics of Nerve Root Compromise
title_sort axial loading during mri induces lumbar foraminal area changes and has the potential to improve diagnostics of nerve root compromise
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082122
work_keys_str_mv AT hebelkahanna axialloadingduringmriinduceslumbarforaminalareachangesandhasthepotentialtoimprovediagnosticsofnerverootcompromise
AT rydbergniklas axialloadingduringmriinduceslumbarforaminalareachangesandhasthepotentialtoimprovediagnosticsofnerverootcompromise
AT hutchinsjohn axialloadingduringmriinduceslumbarforaminalareachangesandhasthepotentialtoimprovediagnosticsofnerverootcompromise
AT lagerstrandkerstin axialloadingduringmriinduceslumbarforaminalareachangesandhasthepotentialtoimprovediagnosticsofnerverootcompromise
AT brisbyhelena axialloadingduringmriinduceslumbarforaminalareachangesandhasthepotentialtoimprovediagnosticsofnerverootcompromise