Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture

Monensin has been part of the beef production landscape for over 45 years. Although first approved for use in finishing cattle, it has since been approved for cattle in extensive production systems and has been an economical way to increase performance of forage-fed animals. This meta-analysis inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadberry, Shane, Lalman, David, White, Frank, Linneen, Sara, Beck, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac031
_version_ 1784692072232517632
author Gadberry, Shane
Lalman, David
White, Frank
Linneen, Sara
Beck, Paul
author_facet Gadberry, Shane
Lalman, David
White, Frank
Linneen, Sara
Beck, Paul
author_sort Gadberry, Shane
collection PubMed
description Monensin has been part of the beef production landscape for over 45 years. Although first approved for use in finishing cattle, it has since been approved for cattle in extensive production systems and has been an economical way to increase performance of forage-fed animals. This meta-analysis investigated the impacts of monensin on performance of stocker cattle on high-forage diets. The stocker performance analysis resulted from 38 experiments with 73 mean comparisons; bloat analysis was conducted with 12 experiments with 23 mean comparisons. The metaphor package (version 2.4-0) for R (version 4.0.3; www.r-project.org) was used to determine the overall effect size of monensin compared to a negative control. Each study’s n, means, and SEM or P-value was used to calculate the mean difference and estimate of within-study variance for responses of interest. Moderators of monensin response considered in the analysis were delivery method, dose, study duration, initial calf BW, diet ME and CP, and forage category. Initial BW and basal ADG averaged 236 ± 45.9 kg and 0.72 ± 0.28 kg, respectively. In the ADG analysis, the only significant moderator of those considered was length of the study (P < 0.01); as duration of the study increased, the ADG response to monensin decreased by 0.0007 kg/day. For the average 112-day length of study, the average monensin response was estimated to be 0.0784 kg/day increase in ADG, approximately 10% above controls. Sufficient information was presented in 18 citations representing 40 mean comparisons for determining the effect of monensin on BW at the end of the experiment. The response model (P < 0.01) for ending BW, kg = 22.3–0.05 (initial calf BW, kg). Thus, for the average initial BW of 235 kg the average monensin response was estimated to be 10.6 kg increase in average ending BW. The incidence (−20%) and severity (−0.7 bloat score) of bloat was found to be reduced in bloat-prone pastures. There is ample evidence that monensin increases performance of growing calves on high forage diets along with reducing the incidence and severity of bloat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9030155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90301552022-04-25 Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture Gadberry, Shane Lalman, David White, Frank Linneen, Sara Beck, Paul Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition Monensin has been part of the beef production landscape for over 45 years. Although first approved for use in finishing cattle, it has since been approved for cattle in extensive production systems and has been an economical way to increase performance of forage-fed animals. This meta-analysis investigated the impacts of monensin on performance of stocker cattle on high-forage diets. The stocker performance analysis resulted from 38 experiments with 73 mean comparisons; bloat analysis was conducted with 12 experiments with 23 mean comparisons. The metaphor package (version 2.4-0) for R (version 4.0.3; www.r-project.org) was used to determine the overall effect size of monensin compared to a negative control. Each study’s n, means, and SEM or P-value was used to calculate the mean difference and estimate of within-study variance for responses of interest. Moderators of monensin response considered in the analysis were delivery method, dose, study duration, initial calf BW, diet ME and CP, and forage category. Initial BW and basal ADG averaged 236 ± 45.9 kg and 0.72 ± 0.28 kg, respectively. In the ADG analysis, the only significant moderator of those considered was length of the study (P < 0.01); as duration of the study increased, the ADG response to monensin decreased by 0.0007 kg/day. For the average 112-day length of study, the average monensin response was estimated to be 0.0784 kg/day increase in ADG, approximately 10% above controls. Sufficient information was presented in 18 citations representing 40 mean comparisons for determining the effect of monensin on BW at the end of the experiment. The response model (P < 0.01) for ending BW, kg = 22.3–0.05 (initial calf BW, kg). Thus, for the average initial BW of 235 kg the average monensin response was estimated to be 10.6 kg increase in average ending BW. The incidence (−20%) and severity (−0.7 bloat score) of bloat was found to be reduced in bloat-prone pastures. There is ample evidence that monensin increases performance of growing calves on high forage diets along with reducing the incidence and severity of bloat. Oxford University Press 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9030155/ /pubmed/35475114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac031 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Gadberry, Shane
Lalman, David
White, Frank
Linneen, Sara
Beck, Paul
Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title_full Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title_short Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
title_sort meta-analysis of the effects of monensin on growth and bloat of cattle on pasture
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac031
work_keys_str_mv AT gadberryshane metaanalysisoftheeffectsofmonensinongrowthandbloatofcattleonpasture
AT lalmandavid metaanalysisoftheeffectsofmonensinongrowthandbloatofcattleonpasture
AT whitefrank metaanalysisoftheeffectsofmonensinongrowthandbloatofcattleonpasture
AT linneensara metaanalysisoftheeffectsofmonensinongrowthandbloatofcattleonpasture
AT beckpaul metaanalysisoftheeffectsofmonensinongrowthandbloatofcattleonpasture