Cargando…

White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia

Deer are keystone hosts for adult ticks and have enabled the spread of tick distributions. The ‘4-Poster’ deer bait station was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to control ticks feeding on free-ranging deer. Although effective in certain scenarios, ‘4-Poster’ deer treatment s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roden-Reynolds, Patrick, Kent, Cody M., Li, Andrew Y., Mullinax, Jennifer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35457754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084889
_version_ 1784692074575036416
author Roden-Reynolds, Patrick
Kent, Cody M.
Li, Andrew Y.
Mullinax, Jennifer M.
author_facet Roden-Reynolds, Patrick
Kent, Cody M.
Li, Andrew Y.
Mullinax, Jennifer M.
author_sort Roden-Reynolds, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Deer are keystone hosts for adult ticks and have enabled the spread of tick distributions. The ‘4-Poster’ deer bait station was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to control ticks feeding on free-ranging deer. Although effective in certain scenarios, ‘4-Poster’ deer treatment stations require the use of bait to attract deer to one location, which may cause increased deer disease transmission rates and habitat damage. To better understand and manage the impact of baited ‘4-Poster’ stations on deer movements, we captured and GPS-monitored 35 deer as part of an integrated pest management project. Fifteen ‘4-Poster’ stations were deployed among three suburban county parks to control ticks. To quantify the effects of ‘4-Poster’ stations, we calculated deer movement metrics before and after feeders were filled with whole kernel corn, and we gathered information on visitation rates to feeders. Overall, 83.3% of collared deer visited a feeder and revisited approximately every 5 days. After feeders were refilled, collared deer were ~5% closer to feeders and conspecifics than before filling. Males used a higher percentage of available feeders and visited them more throughout the deployment periods. Although these nuanced alterations in behavior may not be strong enough to increase local deer abundance, in light of infectious diseases affecting deer populations and effective ‘4-Poster’ densities, the core range shifts and clustering after refilling bait may be a cause for concern. As such, trade-offs between conflicting management goals should be carefully considered when deploying ‘4-Poster’ stations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9030164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90301642022-04-23 White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia Roden-Reynolds, Patrick Kent, Cody M. Li, Andrew Y. Mullinax, Jennifer M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Deer are keystone hosts for adult ticks and have enabled the spread of tick distributions. The ‘4-Poster’ deer bait station was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to control ticks feeding on free-ranging deer. Although effective in certain scenarios, ‘4-Poster’ deer treatment stations require the use of bait to attract deer to one location, which may cause increased deer disease transmission rates and habitat damage. To better understand and manage the impact of baited ‘4-Poster’ stations on deer movements, we captured and GPS-monitored 35 deer as part of an integrated pest management project. Fifteen ‘4-Poster’ stations were deployed among three suburban county parks to control ticks. To quantify the effects of ‘4-Poster’ stations, we calculated deer movement metrics before and after feeders were filled with whole kernel corn, and we gathered information on visitation rates to feeders. Overall, 83.3% of collared deer visited a feeder and revisited approximately every 5 days. After feeders were refilled, collared deer were ~5% closer to feeders and conspecifics than before filling. Males used a higher percentage of available feeders and visited them more throughout the deployment periods. Although these nuanced alterations in behavior may not be strong enough to increase local deer abundance, in light of infectious diseases affecting deer populations and effective ‘4-Poster’ densities, the core range shifts and clustering after refilling bait may be a cause for concern. As such, trade-offs between conflicting management goals should be carefully considered when deploying ‘4-Poster’ stations. MDPI 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9030164/ /pubmed/35457754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084889 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roden-Reynolds, Patrick
Kent, Cody M.
Li, Andrew Y.
Mullinax, Jennifer M.
White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title_full White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title_fullStr White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title_full_unstemmed White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title_short White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia
title_sort white-tailed deer spatial distribution in relation to ‘4-poster’ tick control devices in suburbia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35457754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084889
work_keys_str_mv AT rodenreynoldspatrick whitetaileddeerspatialdistributioninrelationto4postertickcontroldevicesinsuburbia
AT kentcodym whitetaileddeerspatialdistributioninrelationto4postertickcontroldevicesinsuburbia
AT liandrewy whitetaileddeerspatialdistributioninrelationto4postertickcontroldevicesinsuburbia
AT mullinaxjenniferm whitetaileddeerspatialdistributioninrelationto4postertickcontroldevicesinsuburbia